Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Ravi Iron Limited vs Jia Lal Kishori Lal Pvt. Ltd. & Ors

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal8 February 2022Ashok Bhushan

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The filing of an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is governed by limitation, and the date of default mentioned in the application, where no other reason or particulars for extension of limitation are given, is the starting point for determining whether the application is within time. A court-ordered mediation, at which the debtor's post-dated cheques were issued and later dishonoured, does not by itself extend the period of limitation for an application under Section 9, because the purpose of mediation and the issuance of post-dated cheques is distinct from the acknowledgment or extension of a debt that would arise for limitation purposes; the dishonour of such cheques may give rise to other remedies but does not revive or extend the limitation period for a Section 9 application.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHIComp. App. (AT) (Ins.) No. 122 of 2022In the matter of:

Ravi Iron Ltd. ....Appellant Vs. Jia Lal Kishori Lal & Ors. ...Respondents For Appellant: Mr. Vipin Garg, Ms. Krishna Goel, Advocates. For Respondents:

ORDER

(Through Virtual Mode)

08.02.2022: Heard Shri Vipin Garg, Learned Counsel for the Appellant.

2. This Appeal has been filed against the order passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), New Delhi Bench- V dated 02.12.2021 dismissing the Application filed by the Appellant under Section 9 as barred by time. The Appellant has filed Application under Section 9 claiming as an Operational Creditor claiming for payment of principal amount of Rs. 14,01,320/- with interest upto 31.12.2019. In Part- IV of the Application, the Applicant himself has given the date of default as 10.01.2008. Learned Adjudicating Authority has dismissed the Application as barred by time.

3. Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that although the date of default was mentioned as 10.01.2008 in the Application under Section 9 but there was District Court Mediation on 16.11.2015 wherein the Respondent accepted their liability and the post-dated cheques issued were also dishonored. Last cheque was dishonored on 31.12.2016. Hence, the Application filed was within time.

2 4. We have considered the submissions of the Counsel for the Appellant and perused the record.

5. Part-IV of the Application filed under Section 9 has been extracted in Paragraph 5 of the impugned order of the Adjudicating Authority where following is mentioned:-

"Date of default- 10/01/2008 (after 30 days credit period)"

6. When the Application comes with date of default and no other reasons given in the Application or any details for extension of limitation, we see no ground to hold that Application was well within time. The submission of the Counsel for the Appellant is that there was Mediation Order of the Court on 16.11.2015 under which Mediation, post-dated cheques were given. The Mediation which was ordered on 16.11.2015 shall not give any extension of limitation to the Appellant. The purpose of Mediation and post-dated cheques are different and the fact that the cheques were dishonored may give any right to the Appellant to take appropriate proceeding but that shall not give extension of the limitation for the Application under Section 9 of the Code to make it within time.

7. We are of the view that the Application was clearly barred by time and no error has been committed by the Adjudicating Authority rejecting the Application. The Appeal is dismissed.

[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson

[Dr. Ashok Kumar Mishra] Member (Technical)

[Dr. Alok Srivastava] Member (Technical) Anjali/nn

Comp. App. (AT) (Ins.) No. 122 of 2022

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free