Raman Agarwal vs Mohit Chawla & Ors. Resolution ...
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 50 of 2020
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The appellate tribunal disposed of the appeal by remitting the application under Sections 43, 45 and 66 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 to the Adjudicating Authority for decision after the parties file replies, leaving it open to the appellant to show from the record that the impugned transactions were not preferential or undervalued transactions. The tribunal further held that no company application is provided for under the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016, and that in insolvency matters applications are to be entertained as Interlocutory Applications under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Mohit Chawla & Ors. Resolution Professional J.R. Agro Tech Pvt. Ltd. ...Respondent
Present:
For Appellant : Mr. N.P.S. Chawla, Mr. Sujoy Dutta and Mr. Surekh K. Baxy, Advocates
For 1st Respondent: Mr. Nitesh Jain and Mr. Sarthak Sharma, Advocates
ORDER
10.01.2020 Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that the Appellant
has grievance against the impugned order dated 27th November, 2019 limited to
CA No. 543 of 2019 wherein the Appellant/Promoter/Shareholder raised
objection with regard to the maintainability of the application filed by the
'Resolution Professional' / 'Liquidator' under Sections, 43, 45 and 66 of the
'Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ('I&B Code', for short).
Mr. Nitesh Jain, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the 'Resolution
Professional' submits that the 'Promoter'/'Shareholder' cannot object to filing of
the application under Sections 43, 45 and 66 of the 'I&B Code'.
In reply, it is submitted that the objection of the Appellant is that the
application under Sections 43, 45 and 66 is not maintainable as no 'preferential
transactions' or 'under value transactions' were made by the 'Corporate Debtor'. -2-
However, as it has not yet been decided by the Adjudicating Authority, we allow
the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Chandigarh
Bench, Chandigarh to pass appropriate order on the application filed under
Sections 43, 45 and 66 of the 'I&B Code', after giving opportunity to the parties
to file their respective replies, including the Appellant. It will be open to the
Appellant to show that the transactions were not 'preferential transactions' or
'under value transactions', based on the record.
The appeal stands disposed of with aforesaid observations.
At this stage, we may mention that there is no provision to file any
company application under the 'National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016'.
Henceforth, the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal) of the
country will never entertain the company applications in insolvency matters as
Interlocutory Applications are maintainable under the 'I&B Code'.
Let a copy of this order be communicated to Principal Bench, National
Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi and all the Benches of the National Company
Law Tribunal and bring it to the notice of the Registry and all the Hon'ble
Members of the National Company Law Tribunal.
[Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson
[ Justice Bansi Lal Bhat ] Member (Judicial)
/ns/gc/
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 50 of 2020
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free