Rajneesh Nagar vs Anuj Saxena & Anr
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 92 of 2018
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where a financial creditor has received post-dated cheques from the corporate debtor before filing an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, the application is not maintainable on the ground of default, and an order admitting it cannot stand.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Present: For Appellant : Mr. Virendra Ganda, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. P.K. Mittal, Ms. Nibruti Samal and Ms. Shreya Jain, Advocates
ORDER
26.03.2018 This appeal has been preferred by Mr. Rajneesh Nagar,
Director of M/s. Bulland Realtor Pvt. Ltd. (Corporate Debtor) against order dated
6th March, 2018 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law
Tribunal), New Delhi Bench whereby and whereunder an application preferred
by 1st Respondent Mr. Anuj Saxena under Section 7 of the Insolvency and
Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the ' I&B Code') has been
admitted, order of moratorium has been passed and the Resolution Professional
has been appointed with certain directions.
2. Earlier, when the matter was taken up learned counsel for the appellant
submitted that the application under Section 7 was not maintainable. There 2
being no default, as the 'Corporate Debtor' had earlier handed over post-dated
cheques in favour of the 1st Respondent.
3. On notice, Mr. S. N. Gautam, Advocate appeared on behalf of 1st
Respondent. It is accepted that the post-dated cheques were handed over to the
1st Respondent prior to filing of the application under Section 7. The aforesaid
fact was not brought to the notice of the Adjudicating Authority. In the
meantime, one Mr. Sunil Kumar Pathak, Resolution Professional has been
appointed and taken charge of the 'Corporate Debtor'.
4. A joint affidavit has been filed by the parties showing therein 'the terms of
compromise', relevant portion of which reads as follows:
"3. That the Appellants shall pay total of
Rs.32,75,000/- (Rupees Thirty Two Lakh Seventy
Five Thousand only), Rs. 7,00,000/- (Seven Lakh
Only) in terms of the settlement deed dated 08 th
March, 2018, which is on record at page No. 112 of
present Appeal. Respondent has already in
possession of Cheque of Rs. 25 lacs being cheque
No. 000104 payable at Bank of India Deoli
Khanpur Branch, New Delhi. That the Appellant
and its Directors undertake that aforesaid cheque
of Rs. 25 lacs shall be cleared on or before
30.04.2018. Another cheque of Rs. 75000/-, being
Cheque No. 000564 dated 29.03.2018, payable at
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 92 of 2018 3
Bank of India Branch - Deoli Khanpur, Delhi is
given to the Respondent.
4. That Appellant and Respondent based on the
compromise and the undertaking, which has been
given before this Hon'ble Appellant Tribunal by the
Director of the Appellant Company, through
affidavit, now wishes that the appeal may kindly
be allowed by setting aside order dated 6.3.2018
but, however, without prejudice to the rights of the
Respondent No. 1 Mr. Anuj Saxena to receive a total
sum of Rs. 25,75,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Lacs
Seventy Five Thousand only) on or before
30.04.2018 from the appellant No. 1 and/or M/s.
Bulland Realtors (P) Ltd.
5. All the payments, cost etc. which is to be made to
Insolvency Resolution Professional shall be borne
and paid by M/s. Bulland Realtors (P) Ltd.
6. That the present Joint Application is made in the
interest of justice and is bonafide.
5. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and taking into
consideration the fact that the 1st Respondent had received the post-dated
cheques prior to filing of application under Section 7, we are of the view that the
application preferred by the respondents was not maintainable.
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 92 of 2018 4
6. For the reasons aforesaid and in view of the joint compromise petition filed
by the parties, we set aside the order dated 6th March, 2018 passed by the
Adjudicating Authority. The terms of the compromise be treated to be directions
of this Appellate Tribunal. On failure it will be open to the 1st Respondent to file
an application under Section 7 as also a petition for initiating contempt
proceedings.
7. As agreed by Mr. Virendra Ganda, learned Senior Counsel for the appellant
and Mr. Sunil Kumar Pathak, Resolution Professional, the Corporate Debtor will
pay a lump sum of Rupees Five Lakhs towards fee of the Resolution Professional
and additional sum of Rs. One Lakh towards expenses within ten days. The
appeal stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation and directions. No cost.
[Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson
[ Justice Bansi Lal Bhat ] Member (Judicial)
/ns/gc
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 92 of 2018
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free