Rajinder Kapoor Proprietor R.K.Kapoor ... vs Anil Kumar Interim Resolution ...
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 198 of 2017
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Under Section 27 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, where the Committee of Creditors, by a vote of seventy-five per cent of voting shares, proposes to replace the resolution professional appointed under Section 22, the Adjudicating Authority is bound to consider the name of the proposed resolution professional and, where no name has been proposed, may call for a name from the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India. Pending the appointment of a regular resolution professional, the interim resolution professional may be directed to continue performing day-to-day routine work, strictly in accordance with the provisions of the Code.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Rajinder Kapoor Proprietor R.K.Kapoor & Co. . . .Appellant
Versus
Anil Kumar Interim Resolution Professional & Ors. ....Respondents
Present: For Appellant: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Chhetry, Advocate
And Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 200 of 2017
IN THE MATTER OF:
Ashwini Kumar Prabhakar Director Rolex Cycles Pvt. Ltd. .Appellant
Versus
Anil Kumar Interim Resolution Professional & Ors. ...Respondents
Present: For Appellant: Mr. Arun Francis, Advocate
ORDER
22.09.2017 - The appellants have challenged the order dated 8th
September, 2017 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National
Company Law Tribunal), Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh in CA Nos.
122/2017 with C.A. Nos. 123/2017 & 124/2017 in CP (IB) No.
37/Chd/Pb/2017.
2. Learned Counsel for the appellant(s) submits that the term of
'Interim Resolution Professional' (thirty days) has already expired. Thereafter, the Adjudicating Authority was required to appoint
'Insolvency Resolution Professional'.
3. Referring to provisions of 'Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
(hereinafter referred to as "I&B Code") while we observed that it is open
for the Adjudicating Authority to allow the 'Interim Resolution
Professional' to continue as Resolution Professional, learned Counsel for
the appellants submits that the Committee of Creditors has already
decided to remove the present 'Interim Resolution Professional' and to
appoint another 'Insolvency Resolution professional'.
4. In this connection, we may refer to the provisions of Section 27 of
the 'I&B Code' which deals with replacement of Resolution Professional
by Committee of Creditors, which reads as follows: -
"27. Replacement of resolution professional by
committee of creditors. - (1) Where, at any time during
the corporate insolvency resolution process, the
committee of creditors is of the opinion that a resolution
professional appointed under section 22 is required to be
replaced, it may replace him with another resolution
professional in the manner provided under this section.
(2) The committee of creditors may, at a meeting, by a vote
of seventy-five per cent, of voting shares, propose to
replace the resolution professional appointed under
section 22 with another resolution professional. -3-
(3) The committee of creditors shall forward the name of
the insolvency professional proposed by them to the
Adjudicating Authority.
(4) The Adjudicating Authority shall forward the name of
the proposed resolution professional to the Board for its
confirmation and a resolution professional shall be
appointed in the same manner as laid down in section
16.
(5) Where any disciplinary proceedings are pending
against the proposed resolution professional under sub-
section (3), the resolution professional appointed under
section 22 shall continue till the appointment of another
resolution professional under this section."
5. In view of the aforesaid provision, we are of the view that the
Adjudicating Authority is duty bound to consider the name of another
'Resolution Professional', if proposed by the Committee of Creditors or
may call for name from the 'Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India',
if no name has been proposed. We hope and trust that the Adjudicating
Authority will act in accordance with law, as quoted above, and pass
appropriate order on the next date of hearing.
6. Till appropriate order in this regard is passed by the Adjudicating
Authority, the Adjudicating Authority will not give effect to the impugned
order and directions to the extent it is against the provisions of 'I&B 4
Code'. However, till the regular 'Insolvency Resolution Professional' is
appointed, the Interim Resolution Professional may be asked to perform
the day to day routine work, strictly in accordance with the provisions of
the 'I&B Code'.
7. Both the appeals stand disposed of with aforesaid observations and
directions. However, in the facts and circumstances, there shall be no
order as to cost.
(Justice S.J. Mukhbpadhaya) Chairperson
(Justice A.I.S. Cheema) (Balvinder Singh) Member (Judicial) Member(Technical)
ar
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free