Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Rajat Saini & Anr vs Pret Study By Janak Fashions Pvt. Ltd

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal14 October 2019

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

In an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, the absence of any document placed before the Adjudicating Authority showing a pre-existing dispute between the parties regarding the goods supplied, together with the absence of any record that the dispute was raised by the corporate debtor with the operational creditor prior to the issuance of notice under Section 8(1), means that no pre-existing dispute is established. Where the Adjudicating Authority has admitted a Section 9 application and debt and default are present, and no pre-existing dispute has been shown, the admission order does not warrant interference in appeal.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHICompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1026 of 2019IN THE MATTER OF:

Rajat Saini & Anr. ...Appellant

Vs

Pret Study by Janak Fashions Private Limited. ....Respondent

Present: For Appellant: Mr. C. S. Gaurav Kumar, Advocate.

For Respondent:

ORDER

14.10.2019: 'M/s Pret Study by Janak Fashions Private Limited'

(Operational Creditor) filed application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and

Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (for short 'I&B Code') for initiation of Corporate

Insolvency Resolution Process against 'M/s Mars Hospitality and Retail Private

Limited' (Corporate Debtor). The said application having admitted by the

Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Chandigarh Bench by

order dated 3rd September, 2019, the present appeal has been preferred by

Mr. Rajat Saini and Mr. Satbir Singh Saini, Directors of the Corporate Debtor.

2. Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that there is a pre-existing

dispute. However, from the record we find that no document has been produced

or was produced before the Adjudicating Authority to suggest that there is a pre-

existing dispute in regard to goods supplied by 'M/s Pret Study by Janak

Fashions Private Limited' (Operational Creditor) to 'M/s Mars Hospitality and -2-

Retail Private Limited' (Corporate Debtor). The only ground taken is that the

terms of the agreement were violated but no record has been placed by the

Appellant to suggest that prior to issuance of notice under Section 8(1) of I&B

Code such issue was raised by the Corporate Debtor with the Operational

Creditor.

3. In absence of any pre-existing dispute, the Adjudicating Authority having

admitted the application under Section 9 and there being debt and default, we

find no reason to interfere with impugned order dated 3rd September, 2019. The

appeal is dismissed. No cost.

[Justice S. J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson

[Justice A. I. S. Cheema] Member (Judicial)

(Kanthi Narahari) Member (Technical) am/gc

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1026 of 2019

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free