Rajat Saini & Anr vs Pret Study By Janak Fashions Pvt. Ltd
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1026 of 2019
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
In an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, the absence of any document placed before the Adjudicating Authority showing a pre-existing dispute between the parties regarding the goods supplied, together with the absence of any record that the dispute was raised by the corporate debtor with the operational creditor prior to the issuance of notice under Section 8(1), means that no pre-existing dispute is established. Where the Adjudicating Authority has admitted a Section 9 application and debt and default are present, and no pre-existing dispute has been shown, the admission order does not warrant interference in appeal.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Rajat Saini & Anr. ...Appellant
Vs
Pret Study by Janak Fashions Private Limited. ....Respondent
Present: For Appellant: Mr. C. S. Gaurav Kumar, Advocate.
For Respondent:
ORDER
14.10.2019: 'M/s Pret Study by Janak Fashions Private Limited'
(Operational Creditor) filed application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and
Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (for short 'I&B Code') for initiation of Corporate
Insolvency Resolution Process against 'M/s Mars Hospitality and Retail Private
Limited' (Corporate Debtor). The said application having admitted by the
Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Chandigarh Bench by
order dated 3rd September, 2019, the present appeal has been preferred by
Mr. Rajat Saini and Mr. Satbir Singh Saini, Directors of the Corporate Debtor.
2. Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that there is a pre-existing
dispute. However, from the record we find that no document has been produced
or was produced before the Adjudicating Authority to suggest that there is a pre-
existing dispute in regard to goods supplied by 'M/s Pret Study by Janak
Fashions Private Limited' (Operational Creditor) to 'M/s Mars Hospitality and -2-
Retail Private Limited' (Corporate Debtor). The only ground taken is that the
terms of the agreement were violated but no record has been placed by the
Appellant to suggest that prior to issuance of notice under Section 8(1) of I&B
Code such issue was raised by the Corporate Debtor with the Operational
Creditor.
3. In absence of any pre-existing dispute, the Adjudicating Authority having
admitted the application under Section 9 and there being debt and default, we
find no reason to interfere with impugned order dated 3rd September, 2019. The
appeal is dismissed. No cost.
[Justice S. J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson
[Justice A. I. S. Cheema] Member (Judicial)
(Kanthi Narahari) Member (Technical) am/gc
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1026 of 2019
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free