Rahul Gupta vs Mahesh Madhavan
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 03 of 2018
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
A sub-tenant who occupies premises under a lease with an intermediate lessee is not, by reason of that occupation or of any direct part-payment of rent to the head lessor, a corporate debtor owing a debt to the head lessor, so that no operational-creditor relationship arises between the head lessor and the sub-tenant for the purposes of an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016; an application under Section 9 premised on such a relationship is therefore not maintainable and must be rejected, and any admission, moratorium and resolution-professional appointment made on it fall with it.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
[arising out of Order dated 8th December, 2017 by NCLT, Chennai in Case No. CP/625/(IB) /CB/2017]
IN THE MATTER OF:
Rahul Gupta S/o Shri Raj Kumar Gupta, R/o E-1101, The Palm Springs, Golf Course Road, Sector 54, Gurgaon, Haryana - 122 001. ...Appellant
Versus
1. Mahesh Madhavan No. 247, Race Course Road, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu - 641 018.
2. M/s. Black N. Green Mobile Solutions Pvt. Ltd. GEE GEE Universal 7th Floor, No. 2, Mc. Nicholas Road, Chetpet, Chennai - 600 031. Tamil Nadu .... Respondents
For Appellant : Mr. Anish R. Shah, Advocate
For Respondents: Mr. A.K. Mylsamy, Ms. Shalini Kaul and Mr. Chaman Choudhary, Advocates
JUDGMENT
SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J.
The appellant - Rahul Gupta, shareholder of second respondent - 'M/s.
Black N Green Mobile Solutions Pvt. Ltd.' ('Corporate Debtor)' has preferred 2
this appeal against order dated 8th December, 2017 passed by the
Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Chennai Bench
whereby and whereunder application preferred by the respondent - 'Mahesh
Madhavan' under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
(hereinafter referred to as the 'I&B Code') has admitted, order of moratorium
has been passed and the 'Resolution Professional' has been appointed with
certain directions.
2. The main plea taken by the appellant is that the appeal under Section
9 of the I & B Code was not maintainable against the second respondent, who
was not the lessee or tenant of the Mahesh Madhavan (Operational Creditor).
3. The question arises for consideration in this appeal is whether a
'sub-tenant' can be treated to be a 'Corporate Debtor' of the owner of the house
(lessor)?
4. It is not in dispute that an 'Agreement of Lease' was executed on 3rd day
of December, 2012 between 'Mr. Mahesh Madhavan' and one 'M/s. Universal
Power Systems Pvt. Ltd.' for the lease of 8942 sq.ft. of super built up area of
the premises for the purpose of office. 'Mr. Mahesh Madhavan' (Operational
Creditor) has been shown as "Lessor" and 'M/s. Universal Power Systems Pvt.
Ltd.' as "Lessee". The relevant terms and conditions of the agreement, are as
follows:
"B. RENT
That the 'LESSEE' herein agrees that they shall for
the duration of the lease, pay the 'LESSOR' monthly
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 03 of 2018 3
rent circulated at Rs. 70/- per sq. ft. excluding
common area maintenance charges on or before 5th
of every English Calendar month for which it is due
for a period of 1 year with effect from 16 th January
2013 and 5% increase every year on the existing rent
for next 2 years as under :
PERIOD RENT/MONTH DEPOSIT
16.01.2013 Rs.6,25,940/- Rs.62,59,400/- TO 15.01.2014 16.01.2014 TO Rs.6,57,237/- 15.01.2015
16.01.2015 Rs.6,90,099/- TO 15.01.2016
(i) The 'LESSEE' agree to deposit the above said
monthly rent into LESSOR's Bank Account No.
53019310146 with State Bank of India,
Avishanshi Road, NRI Branch, Coimbatore
- 641 018 ; Any delay in payment of rent
would attract interest at 18% per annum;
(ii) The 'LESSEE' confirms that the said monthly
rent is exclusive of taxes and levies charged by
the Government such as Service Tax and that
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 03 of 2018 4
any such taxes or levies shall be borne by the
'LESSEE' only;
(iii) The 'LESSEE' further confirms that he shall
furnish the 'LESSOR' the yearly certificates for
Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) for the rents
paid with respect to the demised premises.
C. SECURTIY DEPOSIT:
(i) The 'LESSEE' has agreed to pay to the
'LESSOR' an Interest free Security Deposit of
Rs.62,59,400/- (Rupees Sixty Two Lakhs Fifty
Nine Thousand and Four Hundred Only) being
ten months rent, as follows:-
a. Rs.40,00,000/- (Rupees Forty Lakhs Only) at
the time of execution of this agreement vide
RTGS through Axis Bank Ltd. UTR No.
UTI30000248 SET 1 STP 12557/43318662
b. Balance of Rs.22,59,400/- (Rupees Twenty
Two Lakhs Fifty Nine Thousand Four Hundred
Only) on or before 15th December, 2012.
(ii) The Lessor shall refund the Interest Free
Refundable Security Deposit to the Lessee on
the expiration or earlier termination of the
lease. The Lessor shall refund the said
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 03 of 2018 5
Security Deposit less any arrears of payment
due from the Lessee simultaneous with the
handover of the Premises by the Lessee to the
Lessor.
(iii) If upon expiration or earlier termination of the
lease, the Lessee is ready to handover the
vacant possession of the Premises to the
Lessor and the Lessor fail to refund the
Security Deposit to the Lessee, the Lessee will
be entitled to retain the possession of the
Premises without paying any applicable Rent
until such time as the entire Security Deposit is
repaid along with interest at the rate of 18%
per annum for the delayed period. In case, the
Lessee is continuing its operations from the
Premises in such a scenario, the Lessee shall
pay the Maintenance Charges and utility
charges on consumption basis only.
(iv) The monthly rent shall be paid by the 'LESSEE'
as per para B above and under no
circumstances the 'LESSEE' can request the
'LESSOR' for adjustment of the Security
Deposit against the monthly rent."
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 03 of 2018 6
5. Subsequently, another 'Lease Agreement' was entered into on 27th
March, 2015 between one 'Mrs. Kaneez Fathima Khader and four others' with
2nd Respondent 'M/s. Black N Green Mobile Solutions Pvt. Ltd.' whereby the
premises in question has been sub-leased in favour of the 2nd Respondent.
The relevant part of the agreement is as follows:
"The Agreement of Lease entered into at Chennai on this
27th day of March in the Year Two Thousand and Fifteen
(2015)
BETWEEN
1. Mrs. Kaneez Fathima Khader, wife of Dr. A.K.Sait,
aged about 63 years, residing No. 21, Rutland Gate IV
Street, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 006.
2. Mrs. Zebunissa Hashim, Wife of Late M. Hashim
Sulaiman, aged about 75 years, residing at No. 13,
Sulaiman Zackria Avenue, Casa Major Road, Egmore,
Chennai - 600 006.
3. Mrs. Razia Humayune Dada, wife of Mr. Humayune
Dada, aged about 76 years, represented by her Power of
Attorney Holder Mrs. Zebunissa Hashim, Wife of (late) M.
Hashim Sulaiman, residing at 13, Sulaiman Zackria
Avenue, Casa Major Road, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.
4. Mrs. Khamrunissa Y Dada, wife of Mr. Imran Yusuf
Dada, aged about 53 years, residing at 13, Sulaiman
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 03 of 2018 7
Zackria Avenue, Casa Major Road, Egmore, Chennai -
600 008.
5. GHYAZ Hashim, son of (late) M. Hashim sulaiman, aged
about 50 years, residing at No. 13, Sulaiman Zackria
Avenue, Casa Major Road, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.
hereinafter referred to as "the LESSOR" (which
expressions shall unless be repugnant to the context or
meaning thereof deem to mean and include his
representatives, administrators, nominees, assigns and
Successors-in-title) of the ONE PART :
AND
Black N Green Mobile Solutions Pvt. Ltd., a company
registered under the Companies Act of 1956 operating
from Gee Gee Universal 2, Mc. Nichols Road, Chetpet,
Chennai - 600 031 and represented herein by its director,
Mr. Karthik Shankar as authorised by the board
resolution dated 8th April, 2011.
Herein after referred to as the LESSEE
Of the OTHER PART:
Wherever the context so requires in the agreement the
singular shall mean and include the plural and the
masculine gender shall mean and include the feminine
gender and references to the individual shall also
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 03 of 2018 8
wherever the context so requires mean and include other
legal entities.
The LESSOR and the LESSEE if admitted in the context
are individually referred to as "Party" and collectively as
"Parties"
Whereas the LESSOR has agreed to grant by way of
Lease to the LESSEE and the LESSEE is desirous of
taking on Lease the 7th floor admeasuring 8942
sq.ft.(super built up area), in the building known as "Gee
Gee UNIVERSAL", No. 2 Mc.Nichols Road, Chetpet,
Chennai - 600 031 together with 8 reserved open to sky
car part around the building and furniture and fittings
more particularly described in "Schedule - A" hereunder
and hereinafter referred to as the "DEMISED
PREMISES" for use as its own office.
AND WHEREAS the Parties hereto are desirous of
reducing the terms and conditions into writing by
executing this Agreement
NOW THIS AGREEMENT OF LEASE WITNESSETH AS
FOLLOWS:
1. DURATION OF THE LEASE
The LESSOR doth hereby confirm that they have
granted unto the LESSEE herein a lease to use
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 03 of 2018 9
and occupy the DEMISED PREMISES with effect
from 1st May 2015 and valid up to 30th April, 2017
both days inclusive i.e. for a period of twenty four
(24) months (The "Lease Period")
2. RENT
That the "LESSEE" herein agrees that it shall for
the duration of the lease, pay the 'LESSOR'
monthly rent calculated as under on or before 5th
of every English Calendar month for which it is
due. It is agreed between the parties herein that
the below mentioned rent payable by the 'LESSEE'
shall be for a period of Four years and as
enhanced in clause 4 infra.
'FITOUT PERIOD' means a Lease Rental free
period of 30 days from 1st April, 2015.
AREA- 8942 SQ.FT.
PERIOD RENT/MONTH DEPOSIT
01.04.2015 TO FITOUT RENT FREE PERIOD 30.04.2015 01.05.2015 TO Rs.4,47,100/- Rs.35,76,800/- 30.04.2017
01.05.2017 TO Rs.4,91,810/- Rs.39,34,480/- 30.04.2019
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 03 of 2018 10
The monthly rent shall be paid by the 'LESSEE' as
above and under no circumstances the "LESSEE'
can request the 'LESSORS' for adjustment of the
Security Deposit against the monthly rent."
6. The case of the respondent is that sub-tenant (Corporate Debtor) was
paying part of the rent directly to Mr. Mahesh Madhavan (Financial Creditor).
The said sub-tenant having failed to pay, the 'Operational Creditor' moved the
application under Section 9 for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution
Process against the 'sub-tenant'/'Corporate Debtor' wherein principal sum of
Rs.28,04,553 along with 18% interest per annum has been shown towards
lease rent for the period from 5th October, 2014 to 5th May, 2015. 'Mr. Mahesh
Madhavan' has shown to be 'Operational Creditor' and 'M/s. Black N Green
Mobile Solutions Pvt. Ltd.' as Corporate Debtor.
7. From the admitted fact, we find that 'Mr. Mahesh Madhavan'
(Operational Creditor) had not entered into any agreement with 'M/s. Black N.
Green Mobile Solutions Pvt. Ltd.' (Corporate Debtor). The Agreement dated
3rd December, 2012 was reached between 'Mr. Mahesh Madhavan'
(Operational Creditor) with one 'M/s. Universal Power Systems Pvt. Ltd.' and
not with the Corporate Debtor in question. 'M/s. Black N. Green Mobile
Solutions Pvt. Ltd.' (Corporate Debtor) is not in the occupation of the premises
on the basis of aforesaid agreement dated 3rd December, 2012. A separate
lease dated 27th March, 2015 was entered into between Mrs. Kaneez Fathima
Khader and four others (Lessor) and M/s. Black N. Green Mobile Solutions
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 03 of 2018 11
Pvt. Ltd. (Lessee). Merely because 'sub-tenant' is occupying the premises does
not mean of landlord tenant that Mr. Mahesh Madhavan is 'Operational
Creditor' of M/s. Black N. Green Mobile Solutions Pvt. Ltd.. Sub-tenant has
no liability to pay the rent to the original owner of the premises, but to the
tenant with which it has executed the agreement. If part of the payment was
made directly by the 'sub-tenant' to Mr. Mahesh Madhavan (Operational
Creditor) it will not create the relationship of 'Operational Creditor' and the
'Corporate Debtor' between the aforesaid two persons.
8. The Adjudicating Authority having failed to notice the aforesaid fact
wrongly admitted the application and in absence of any relationship between
'Mr. Mahesh Madhavan' (Operational Creditor) and 'M/s. Black N. Green
Mobile Solutions Pvt. Ltd.' as Corporate Debtor, the petition under Section 9
was not maintainable and was fit to be rejected.
9. For the aforesaid reasons, we set aside the impugned order dated 8th
December, 2017 in C.P. NO. CP/625/(IB)/CB/2017.
10. In effect, order(s) passed by Ld. Adjudicating Authority appointing
'Resolution Professional', declaring moratorium, freezing of account, and all
other order(s) passed by Adjudicating Authority pursuant to impugned order
and action taken by the 'Resolution Professional', including the advertisement
published in the newspaper calling for applications all such orders and actions
are declared illegal and are set aside. The application preferred by Respondent
under Section 9 of the I&B Code, 2016 is dismissed. Learned Adjudicating
Authority will now close the proceeding. 'M/s. Black N. Green Mobile Solutions
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 03 of 2018 12
Pvt. Ltd.' is released from all the rigour of law and is allowed to function
independently through its Board of Directors from immediate effect.
11. Learned Adjudicating Authority will fix the fee of the 'Resolution
Professional', and 'M/s. Black N. Green Mobile Solutions Pvt. Ltd.' will pay
the fees and other cost incurred by the Resolution Professional. The appeal
is allowed with aforesaid observation and direction. However, in the facts and
circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to cost.
[Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson
[ Justice Bansi Lal Bhat ] Member(Judicial)
New Delhi
21st May, 2018
/ns/
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 03 of 2018
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free