Raghav Sharma vs Ivl Finance Pvt. Ltd. & Anr
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 427 of 2019
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
A financial creditor's application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is maintainable where a default in payment of a financial debt of not less than one lakh rupees has occurred, and the loan has been validly recalled under the agreement's events-of-default clause; the existence of a dispute as to the debt does not defeat the application, since the adjudicating authority need only be satisfied that the debt is due and payable. A mismatch between the amount claimed by the financial creditor and the amount the corporate debtor says is due is not a ground to reject the Section 7 application: the claim is to be filed with the Resolution Professional, who collates it and, on verification, determines the amount payable in accordance with the resolution plan, and does not himself adjudicate the claim.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Raghav Sharma ...Appellant
Vs
IVL Finance Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. ....Respondents
Present:
For Appellant: Mr. Sangram Patnaik, Ms. Tania Sharma and Ms. Rukmini, Advocates.
For Respondents:
ORDER
22.04.2019: 'IVL Finance Pvt. Ltd.' (Financial Creditor) filed application
under Section 7 against 'Incom Cables Private Limited' (Corporate Debtor), which
was admitted by the Adjudicating Authority by impugned order dated 8th April,
2019. The Appellant, shareholder of the Corporate Debtor has challenged the
same mainly on the ground that there is no default.
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant submits that in
terms of the agreement the total amount is to be paid by 5th June, 2020. There
were three times defaults for which the Respondent issued notice, pursuant to
which the default amount has been paid, therefore, according to him there is no
default and in absence of default the application under Section 7 is not
maintainable and the Adjudicating Authority had no jurisdiction to entertain the
application.
-2-
3. He further submitted that there was mismatch in the amount which
according to the Adjudicating Authority is to be determined by the Resolution
Professional or the Committee of Creditors. According to him, it is against the
provisions of the I&B Code and also against the decision of Hon'ble Supreme
Court in "Innoventive Industries Ltd. Vs. ICICI Bank and Ors. reported in (2018)1
SCC 407", and "Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Union of India & Ors., Writ
Petition (Civil) No. 99/2018, reported in 2019 SCC OnLine SC 73".
4. Admittedly, the loan agreement was executed between the parties on 27th
July, 2017, in the said agreement the Directors of the Corporate Debtor namely
Mr. Raghav Sharma and Ms. Rupa Rani Sharma were the co-borrowers. The
clause dealing with the 'event of default' committed by the Corporate Debtor in
the agreement reads as under:-
"12. EVENTS OF DEFAULT
12.1 Each of the events or circumstances set out herein is
an Event of Default.
(a) Non-payment
The Borrower(s) do not pay by the Due Date(s) the
Borrower's Dues (or part thereof) and /or any amount
payable pursuant to a Loan Document.
(b) ...........
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 427 of 2019 -3-
(c) ...........
(d) ...........
(e) ...........
(f) ...........
(g) ...........
(h) ...........
(i) ...........
12.2 On an at any time after the occurrence of an Event of
Default, Lender may, with or without any notice to any of the
Obligor(s) and with or without the intervention of the
court/arbitrator (i) cancel/recall the Loan whereupon the
Borrower's Dues shall become immediately repayable/
payable by the Obligator(s); and/or (ii) initiative/ exercise any
or all of its rights, actions, remedies and powers under the
Loan Documents and/or applicable laws (including issuance
of show-cause notice(s) to the Obligator(s) and for making
submissions before the relevant committee of the Lender).,
and/or (iii) enforce, sell, invoke, deliver, deal with, take
possession, convey, transfer, assign, lease, sub-lease,
encumber and/or dispose of in any manner ................"
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 427 of 2019 -4-
5. From the aforesaid terms of agreement it is clear that the moment there is
a default it is open to the Financial Creditor to recall the total loan amount. It
is not in dispute that the Financial Creditor in view of the three defaults recalled
the loan amount though amounts payable as per three defaults were made good.
6. In the case of "Innoventive Industries Ltd. Vs. ICICI Bank and Ors. reported
in (2018)1 SCC 407", the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed:-
"27. The scheme of the Code is to ensure that when a default
takes place, in the sense that a debt becomes due and is
not paid, the insolvency resolution process begins.
Default is defined in Section 3(12) in very wide terms as
meaning non-payment of a debt once it becomes due and
payable, which includes non-payment of even part
thereof or an instalment amount. For the meaning of
"debt", we have to go to Section 3(11), which in turn tells
us that a debt means a liability of obligation in respect of
a "claim" and for the meaning of "claim", we have to go
back to Section 3(6) which defines "claim" to mean a right
to payment even if it is disputed. The Code gets triggered
the moment default is of rupees one lakh or more (Section
4). The corporate insolvency resolution process may be
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 427 of 2019 -5-
triggered by the corporate debtor itself or a financial
creditor or operational creditor. A distinction is made by
the Code between debts owed to financial creditors and
operational creditors. A financial creditor has been
defined under Section 5(7) as a person to whom a
financial debt is owed and a financial debt is defined in
Section 5(8) to mean a debt which is disbursed against
consideration for the time value of money. As opposed to
this, an operational creditor means a person to whom an
operational debt is owed and an operational debt under
Section 5(21) means a claim in respect of provision of
goods or services.
28. When it comes to a financial creditor triggering the
process, Section 7 becomes relevant. Under the
explanation to Section 7(1), a default is in respect of a
financial debt owed to any financial creditor of the
corporate debtor - it need not be a debt owed to the
applicant financial creditor. Under Section 7(2), an
application is to be made under sub-section (1) in such
form and manner as is prescribed, which takes us to the
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 427 of 2019 -6-
Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating
Authority) Rules, 2016. Under Rule 4, the application is
made by a financial creditor in Form 1 accompanied by
documents and records required therein. Form 1 is a
detailed form in 5 parts, which requires particulars of the
applicant in Part I, particulars of the corporate debtor in
Part II, particulars of the proposed interim resolution
professional in part III, particulars of the financial debt in
part IV and documents, records and evidence of default
in part V. Under Rule 4(3), the applicant is to dispatch a
copy of the application filed with the adjudicating
authority by registered post or speed post to the
registered office of the corporate debtor. The speed,
within which the adjudicating authority is to ascertain
the existence of a default from the records of the
information utility or on the basis of evidence furnished
by the financial creditor, is important. This it must do
within 14 days of the receipt of the application. It is at the
stage of Section 7(5), where the adjudicating authority is
to be satisfied that a default has occurred, that the
corporate debtor is entitled to point out that a default has
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 427 of 2019 -7-
not occurred in the sense that the "debt", which may also
include a disputed claim, is not due. A debt may not be
due if it is not payable in law or in fact. The moment the
adjudicating authority is satisfied that a default has
occurred, the application must be admitted unless it is
incomplete, in which case it may give notice to the
applicant to rectify the defect within 7 days of receipt of
a notice from the adjudicating authority. Under sub-
section (7), the adjudicating authority shall then
communicate the order passed to the financial creditor
and corporate debtor within 7 days of admission or
rejection of such application, as the case may be.
...x...x...x..
30. On the other hand, as we have seen, in the case of a
corporate debtor who commits a default of a financial
debt, the adjudicating authority has merely to see the
records of the information utility or other evidence
produced by the financial creditor to satisfy itself that a
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 427 of 2019 -8-
default has occurred. It is of no matter that the debt is
disputed so long as the debt is "due" i.e. payable unless
interdicted by some law or has not yet become due in the
sense that it is payable at some future date. It is only
when this is proved to the satisfaction of the adjudicating
authority that the adjudicating authority may reject an
application and not otherwise."
6. From the aforesaid fact it will be evident that even if debt is disputed, there
being a default of payment of more than Rupees One Lakh, on recall of loan
amount, the application under Section 7 was maintainable. So far as the
mismatch of the claim is concerned, the Respondent is required to file the claim
before the Resolution Professional. The Resolution Professional is to collate the
claim, though he has no right to decide the claim as decided by Hon'ble Supreme
Court in "Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Union of India & Ors., Writ Petition
(Civil) No. 99/2018, reported in 2019 SCC OnLine SC 73". The Resolution
Professional has right to collate the claim and on verification of the claim,
determines the claim payable or part of it in terms with the resolution plan.
7. In view of the aforesaid fact and position of the law, we are not inclined to
interfere with the impugned order. In absence of any merit, appeal is dismissed.
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 427 of 2019 -9-
No costs. However, this order will not come in the way of the Appellant to settle
the claim in terms of the provisions of the I&B Code including Section 12A.
[Justice S. J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson
[Justice A. I. S. Cheema] Member (Judicial)
(Kanthi Narahari) Member (Technical)
am/gc
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 427 of 2019
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free