R. Adaikkalavan vs C.T. Ramanathan Infrastructure (P) Ltd ...
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 832 of 2019
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where a Committee of Creditors, after a resolution plan is found not viable or feasible and the 270-day period under the I&B Code has run, decides to request liquidation, an order of liquidation under Section 33 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 may properly be passed on that basis, and the Appellate Tribunal will not interfere with it. On liquidation of a corporate debtor, the liquidator is bound to follow the procedure of Section 230 of the Companies Act, 2013 where creditors, members or the corporate debtor propose a compromise or arrangement, as laid down in the Tribunal's earlier decision in Y. Shivram Prasad v. S. Dhanapal, and the Adjudicating Authority may, in approving such an arrangement, overrule objections where the scheme is beneficial to revival of the corporate debtor and is consistent with the objects of the Code. A member of the company may approach the creditors (financial creditors or the Committee of Creditors) and the liquidator to propose an arrangement under Section 230 of the Companies Act, 2013, and the liquidation order does not preclude such a proposal.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
R. Adaikkalavan ...Appellant
Versus
C.T. Ramanathan Infrastructure (P) Ltd. & 2 Others ...Respondents
Present: For Appellant : Ms. Toral Banerjee, Advocate
ORDER
20.08.2019 Having heard learned counsel for the appellant and being
satisfied with the grounds, the delay of 12 days in preferring the appeal is
condoned.
I.A. No. 2538 of 2019 stands disposed of.
The Appellant - Shareholder of 'M/s. C.T. Ramanathan Infrastructure
Private Limited has preferred this appeal against order dated 3rd May, 2019
passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Single
Bench, Chennai whereby order of 'Liquidation' has been passed in exercise of
powers conferred under Section 33(1) of the I&B Code on the basis of the decision
of the 'Committee of Creditors'.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant submits that the
Appellant submitted a 'Terms of Settlement' and it was not considered in proper
manner and the order of 'Liquidation' was passed. 2
On hearing the learned counsel for the Appellant and perusal of the record,
we find that after long period 'resolution plan' was filed which was not found to
be viable and feasible and it not effective for reviving the 'Corporate Debtor' and
as 270 days was completed, the 'Committee of Creditors' decided to request the
Adjudicating Authority to liquidate the 'Corporate Debtor', so an order of
liquidation under Section 33 of the 'I&B Code' came to be passed. For the said
reason, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order dated 3rd May,
2019.
However, we make it clear that while liquidating the 'Corporate Debtor'
(Company), the 'Liquidator' is required to follow the provisions of Section 230 of
the Companies Act, 2013 in terms of decision of this Appellate Tribunal in "Y.
Shivram Prasad Vs. S. Dhanapal & Ors. - Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency)
No. 224 of 2018 etc." observed and held :
15. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
Appellant (Promoter) submitted that the provisions
under Section 230 may not be completed within 90
days, as observed in "S.C. Sekaran v. Amit
Gupta & Ors." (Supra).
16. It is further submitted that there will be objections
by some of the creditors or members who may not
allow the Tribunal to pass appropriate order under
Section 230 of the Companies Act, 2013.
17. Normally, the total period for liquidation is to be
completed preferably within two years. Therefore,
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 832 of 2019 3
in "S.C. Sekaran v. Amit Gupta & Ors." (Supra),
this Appellate Tribunal allowed 90 days' time to
take steps under Section 230 of the Companies Act,
2013. In case, for any reason the liquidation
process under Section 230 takes more time, it is
open to the Adjudicating Authority (Tribunal) to
extend the period if there is a chance of approval of
arrangement of the scheme.
18. During proceeding under Section 230, if any,
objection is raised, it is open to the Adjudicating
Authority (National Company Law Tribunal) which
has power to pass order under Section 230 to
overrule the objections, if the arrangement and
scheme is beneficial for revival of the 'Corporate
Debtor' (Company). While passing such order, the
Adjudicating Authority is to play dual role, one as
the Adjudicating Authority in the matter of
liquidation and other as a Tribunal for passing
order under Section 230 of the Companies Act,
2013. As the liquidation so taken up under the 'I&B
Code', the arrangement of scheme should be in
consonance with the statement and object of the
'I&B Code'. Meaning thereby, the scheme must
ensure maximisation of the assets of the 'Corporate
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 832 of 2019 4
Debtor' and balance the stakeholders such as, the
'Financial Creditors', 'Operational Creditors',
'Secured Creditors' and 'Unsecured Creditors'
without any discrimination. Before approval of an
arrangement or Scheme, the Adjudicating Authority
(National Company Law Tribunal) should follow the
same principle and should allow the 'Liquidator' to
constitute a 'Committee of Creditors' for its opinion
to find out whether the arrangement of Scheme is
viable, feasible and having appropriate financial
matrix. It will be open for the Adjudicating Authority
as a Tribunal to approve the arrangement or
Scheme in spite of some irrelevant objections as
may be raised by one or other creditor or member
keeping in mind the object of the Insolvency and
Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
19. In view of the observations aforesaid, we hold that
the liquidator is required to act in terms of the
aforesaid directions of the Appellate Tribunal and
take steps under Section 230 of the Companies Act.
If the members or the 'Corporate Debtor' or the
'creditors' or a class of creditors like 'Financial
Creditor' or 'Operational Creditor' approach the
company through the liquidator for compromise or
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 832 of 2019 5
arrangement by making proposal of payment to all
the creditor(s), the Liquidator on behalf of the
company will move an application under Section
230 of the Companies Act, 2013 before the
Adjudicating Authority i.e. National Company Law
Tribunal, Chennai Bench, in terms of the
observations as made in above. On failure, as
observed above, steps should be taken for outright
sale of the 'Corporate Debtor' so as to enable the
employees to continue.
20. Both the appeals are disposed of with aforesaid
observations and directions. No cost."
The Appellant being member of the Company may move before the
Creditors (Financial Creditors/Committee of Creditors) and the 'Liquidator' to
propose any arrangement in terms of the provisions of Section 230 of the
Companies Act. In such case, the impugned order will not come in the way of
the Appellant. The appeal stands disposed of with aforesaid observations. No
order as to costs.
[Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson
[ Justice A.I.S. Cheema ] Member (Judicial)
[ Kanthi Narahari ] Member (Technical) /ns/gc
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 832 of 2019
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free