Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Quarkcity India Private Limited, ... vs Assessee

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal20 February 2015

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

Where a Tribunal has dismissed an appeal in limine after the assessee failed to appear on a date that had been mis-noted, and the assessee shows reasonable cause for its non-appearance, the Tribunal may recall its dismissal order in the interest of justice and restore the appeal for hearing.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNALCHANDIGARH BENCHES 'A' CHANDIGARHBEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ANDSHRI T.R. SOOD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBERMA No. 29/Chd/2014In I TA No. 275/CHD/2013Assessment Year: 2009-10

M/s Quarkcity I ndia Private Limited Vs. The Addl. CI T, A-40 A, I ndustrial Area, Range VI , Mohali Mohali

PAN No. AAACQ1134G

(Appellant) (Respondent)

Appellant By : Shri Vineet Thakral Respondent By : Shri S.K. Mittal

Date of hearing : 20/02/2015 Date of Pronouncement : 20/02/2015

ORDER

PER T.R.SOOD, A.M.

Through this Misc. Application assessee has sought recalling of the order of Tribunal in I TA No. 275/CHD/2013.

2. Ld. Counsel for the assessee referred to the Misc. Application and submitted that appeal was adjourned on the date of hearing to 04-12-2013 which was inadvertently noted as 24-12-2013. Since appeal has been dismissed in lemine without providing opportunity of hearing, therefore he made a prayer for recalling of the order of Tribunal.

3. On the other hand Ld. DR strongly supported the order of Tribunal.

4. After considering the rival submissions carefully we are satisfied that assessee had reasonable cause for not making appearance before the Tribunal. Further appeal has been dismissed in lemine therefore, in the interest of justice we recall the order of Tribunal in ITA No. 275/CHD/2013.

5. Registry is directed to fix the hearing of appeal on 11/05/2015 and assessee shall take notice from this order itself as no separate notice would be issued.

6. In the result Misc. Application is allowed.

Order Pronounced in the Open Court on this 20/02/2015

Sd/- Sd/-

(BHAVNESH SAINI) (T.R. SOOD) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated : 20/02/2015 AG

Copy to: The Appellant, The Respondent, The CIT, The CIT(A), The DR

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free