Prowess International Pvt. Ltd vs Parker Hannifin India Pvt. Ltd
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insol.) No. 89 of 2017
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Under Rule 8 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016, an application under Section 9 of the Code may be withdrawn only on the applicant's request made before the application is admitted; once an application has been admitted, the Adjudicating Authority has no power to permit its withdrawal at the applicant's instance. Where an order admitting a Section 9 application was passed without notice to the corporate debtor in breach of the principles of natural justice, that defect is not a ground on which the Appellate Tribunal can set aside the admission order where that order is not itself under challenge in the appeal; the Tribunal cannot grant relief that presupposes setting aside the admission order in the absence of a challenge to it. Once the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process has been initiated, where all creditors have been paid or satisfied and no default subsists, the Adjudicating Authority may, after notice to the individual claimants and consideration of the resolution plan and the Insolvency Resolution Professional's report, close the proceedings, without awaiting the full resolution period, on being satisfied that the interests of all stakeholders have been balanced and satisfied.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Prowess International Pvt. Ltd. ...Appellant
Vs.
Parker Hannifin India Pvt. Ltd. ...Respondent
Present: For Appellant: - Mr. Akhilesh Shrivastava, Advocate, Ms. Suhita Mukhopadhyay, PCS Mr. Arun Kumar Gupta, IRP.
ORDER
18.08.2017- The Respondent- Parker Hannifin India Pvt. Ltd.
'Operational Creditor' preferred an application under Section 9 of the
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as "I &
B Code") for initiation of 'Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process'
before the National Company Law Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as
"Adjudicating Authority"), Kolkata Bench. The Adjudicating Authority by
order dated 20th April, 2017 admitted the application and initiated the
'Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process'. Ordered for publication of
notice in the newspaper and declared Moratorium.
2. The appellant-'Corporate Debtor' having come to know of order
passed by Adjudicating Authority, settled the dispute with the
'Operational Creditor' and other Creditors who applied pursuant to
notice and filed an Interlocutory Application for withdrawal of the
petition. By impugned order dated 29th May, 2017, the Adjudicating Authority rejected the application on the ground that after admission of
an application, petition for withdrawal cannot be entertained.
3. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that the
application was admitted on 201h April, 2017, without notice to the
appellant-'Corporate Debtor'. Subsequently, having come to know of
the same, the amount claimed by 'Operational Creditor' and other
Creditors has already been paid and claims of all the Creditors have
been satisfied;. in that view of the matter, the Adjudicating Authority
ought to have allowed the appellant to withdraw the application.
4. Notice was issued on respondent and the 'Insolvency Resolution
Professional'. In spite of service of notice, the Respondent- 'Operational
Creditor' has not appeared and not disputed the stand taken by
appellant.
5. Mr. Arun Kumar Gupta, Chartered Accountant, 'Insolvency
Resolution Professional' is present in person and filed an affidavit
wherein following statement has been made: -
"2. That in terms of Section 15 of the Code and as
required under Regulation 6(2)(b)(i) of the Insolvency
and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution
Process for Corporate persons) Regulations, 2016, and
also per direction of the Hon'ble Bench vide its order
passed on 20.4.17, a public announcement was issued
in two newspapers in the state of Jharkhand where the 3
Registered Office of the Corporate Debtor is situated;
The public announcement were issued in the
Jamshedpur editions of The Telegraph (English) and
Chamakta Aaina (Hindi) on 26.4.17. A copy of the
public announcement as published in both the
newspapers are annexed hereto and collectively
marked as Annexure - B.
3. That in terms of Section 15 of the Code and as
required under Regulation 6(2)(b)(iii) of the Insolvency
and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution
Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016, the
same public announcement was also uploaded on the
website of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of
India (IBBI).
4. That the last date for submission of claims was 4,
5, 1 7per the Public Announcement. Asper Regulations,
a creditor, who failed to su bmit proof of claim within the
time stipulated in the public announcement, may submit
such proof to the Interim Resolution Professional or the
Resolution Professional, as the case may be, till the
approval of a resolution plan by the committee.
5. That pursuant to the public announcement, claims
from only 2 creditors have been received till date as per
details given below -
4
SL. NAME OF CONTACT CATEGORY SECURITY AMOUNT Date NO. CREDITO PERSON CREATED CLAIMED R (Rs.) Claim
ed
Punjab Preeti Jha, Chief . Financial Fixed 2,87,55,64 Email National Manager, Creditor- Deposit of 9/- on Bank, bo0225(pnb.co.in Cash 1,85,10,50 4.5.1 Bistupur Credit 5/-, Block 7 Branch, Account assets Jamshedp including ur Leasehold Account factory Number- land 02250031 71160 2 Punjab Preeti Jha, Chief Financial Cash 54,71,127/ Email National Manager, Creditor- margin of - on Bank, bo0225(ipnb,co.in Bank 100%- 4.5.1 Bistupur Guarantee 54,71,127/ 7 Branch, -, Block Jamshedp assets ur including Account Leasehold Number- factory 02250031 land 71160 3 Parker Priti Baria, Operationa None 45,73,250/ Email Hannifin Company 1 Creditor- - of India Pvt. Secretary, Applicant 8.5.1 Ltd. priti.banaparker. 7 corn
6. That the meetings of the Committee of Creditors,
consisting solely of Punjab National Bank were held on
6.5.17 and 12.7.17 respectively.
7. That progress reports were submitted by me before
the Hon'ble National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata
Bench, Kolkata as per below details -
1st Progress Report on 28.4.17 and 4th Progress
Report on 23.6.17."
6. 'Insolvency Resolution Professional' submits that the claim amount
of all the creditors have been paid. The Punjab National Bank has not declared their account as Non-Performing Asset (NPA) account and the
account is standard account from where payment is made.
7. As per Rule 8 of the I & B Code (Application to Adjudicating
Authority) Rules 2016, the Adjudicating Authority may permit
withdrawal of the application on the request of the applicant before its
admission. Tribunal has no power to allow any applicant or any other
person to withdraw the application after admission, as apparent from
Rule 8 and quoted below:
"8. Withdrawal of application- The Adjudicating Authority
may permit withdrawal of the application made under rules 4,
6 or 7, as the case may be, on a request made by the applicant
before its admission."
8. In the aforesaid circumstances, Ld. Adjudicating Authority having
refused the applicant- Parker Hannifin India Pvt. Ltd. to withdraw the
application after admission of the same, no interference is called for in
absence of any illegality.
9. In so far as the order dated 20th April, 2017 by which the application
under section 9 was admitted is concerned, we are not deciding the
question of legality and proprietary of the said order having not
challenged. However, we have noticed the submissions made on behalf of
the appellant and not disputed by the respondent that order dated 20th
April, 2017 has been passed, in violation of Rules of natural justice
without notice to the 'Corporate Debtor'. This is also clear from the order 6
dated 20th April, 2017, wherein the appearance of the
applicant/ respondent has been recorded but no reference of the
appearance of the 'Corporate Debtor' has been made by the Adjudicating
Authority.
10. If the order dated 20th April, 2017, would have been challenged by
the appellant, it was open to this Appellate Tribunal to set aside the order
dated 20th April, 2017 and then to permit the 'Operational Creditor' to
withdraw the application, in view of settlement. In the present case as the
order of admission is not under challenge and the application cannot be
withdrawn, we cannot grant the relief as sought for by the appellant.
11. However, we make it clear that the 'Corporate Insolvency Resolution
Process' starts with admission of an application under sections 7 or 9 or
10 of the I & B Code and comes to an end if resolution plan is approved
under sub-section (1) of Section 31 and if not approved after completion
of liquidation proceeding. As per the procedure, a Committee of Creditors
is to be formed under section 21, which reads as follows:
"21. Committee of creditors. - (1) The interim
resolution professional shall after collation of all claims
received against the corporate debtor and determination
of the financial position of the corporate debtor,
constitute a committee of creditors.
(2) The committee of creditors shall comprise allfinancial.
creditors of the corporate debtor:
7
Provided that a related party to whom a
corporate debtor owes a financial debt shall not have
any right of representation, participation or voting in a
meeting of the committee of creditors. Personnel to
extend cooperation to interim resolution professional.
Management of operations of corporate debtor as going
concern. Committee of creditors.
(3) Where the corporate debtor owes financial debts to
two or more financial creditors as part of a consortium
or agreement, each such financial creditor shall be part
of the committee of creditors and their voting share shall
be determined on the basis of the financial debts owed
to them.
(4) Where any person is a financial creditor as well as
an operational creditor, -
(a) such person shall be a financial creditor to the
extent of the financial debt owed by the corporate
debtor, and shall be included in the committee of
creditors, with voting share proportionate to the
extent offinancial debts owed to such creditor;
(b) such person shall be considered to be an
operational creditor to the extent of the operational
debt owed by the corporate debtor to such creditor. (5) Where an operational creditor has assigned or legally
transferred any operational debt to a financial creditor,
the assignee or transferee shall be considered as an
operational creditor to the extent of such assignment or
legal transfer.
(6) Where the terms of the financial debt extended as
part of a consortium arrangement or syndicated facility
or issued as securities provide for a single trustee or
agent to act for all financial creditors, each financial
creditor may--
(a). authorise the trustee or agent to act on his
behalf in the committee of creditors to the extent of
his voting share;
(b) represent himself in the committee of creditors
to the extent of his voting share;
(c) appoint an insolvency professional (other than
the resolution professional) at his own cost to
represent himself in the committee of creditors to
the extent of his voting share; or
(d) exercise his right to vote to the extent of his
voting share with one or more financial creditors
jointly or severally.
9
(7) The Board may specify the manner of determining
the voting share in respect of financial debts issued as
securities under sub-section (6).
(8) All decisions of the committee of creditors shall be
taken by a vote of not less than seventy-five per cent. of
voting share of the financial creditors:
Provided that where a corporate debtor does not
have any financial creditors, the committee of creditors
shall be constituted and comprise of such persons to
exercise such functions in such manner as may be
specified by the Board.
(9) The committee of creditors shall have the right to
require the resolution professional to furnish any
financial information in relation to the corporate debtor
at any time during the corporate insolvency resolution
process.
(10) The resolution professional shall make available
any financial information so required by the committee
of creditors under sub-section (9) within a period of
seven days of such requisition."
12. It should be followed by meeting of Committee of Creditors under
section 24 for the purpose as mentioned therein and quoted below: - 10
"24. Meeting of Committee of Creditors. - (1) The
members of the committee of creditors may meet in
person or by such electronic means as may be
specified.
(2) All meetings of the committee of creditors shall be
conducted by the resolution professional.
(3) The resolution professional shall give notice of
each meeting of the committee of creditors to--
(a) members of Committee of creditors;
(b) members of the suspended Board of Directors or
the partners of the corporate persons, as the case
may be;
(c) operational creditors or their representatives if
the amount of their aggregate dues is not less than
ten per cent. of the debt.
(4) The directors, partners and one representative of
operational creditors, as referred to in sub-section (3),
may attend the meetings of committee of creditors,
but shall not have any right to vote in such meetings:
Provided that the absence of any such director,
partner or representative of operational creditors, as 11
the case may be, shall not invalidate proceedings of
such meeting.
(5) Any creditor who is a member of the committee of
creditors may appoint an insolvency professional
other than the resolution professional to represent
such creditor in a meeting of the committee of
creditors:
Provided that the fees payable to such
insolvency professional representing any individual
creditor will be borne by such creditor. Resolution
professional to conduct corporate insolvency
resolution process. Meeting of committee of creditors.
(6) Each creditor shall vote in accordance with the
voting share assigned to him based on the financial
debts owed to such creditor.
(7) The resolution professional shall determine the
voting share to be assigned to each creditor in the
manner specified by the Board.
(8) The meetings of the committee of creditors shall
be conducted in such manner as may be specjfied." 12
13. In the meantime, Interim Resolution Professional is required to
perform duties in terms of Section 23 and to protect and preserve the
assets of the 'Corporate Debtor' under Section 25.
14. After collection of all the materials, the Committee of Creditors are
required to submit a resolution plan to the Resolution Professional on the
basis of information memorandum as per Section 30, as quoted below: -
"30. Submission of resolution plan. - (1) A
resolution applicant may submit a resolution plan to
the resolution professional prepared on the basis of
the information memorandum.
(2) The resolution professional shall examine each
resolution plan received by him to confirm that each
resolution plan--
(a) provides for the payment of insolvency
resolution process costs in a manner specified
by the Board in priority to the repayment of
other debts of the corporate debtor;
(b) provides for the repayment of the debts of
operational creditors in such manner as may
be specified by the Board which shall not be
less than the amount to be paid to the
operational creditors in the event of a 13
liquidation of the corporate debtor under
section 53;
(c) provides for the management of the affairs
of the Corporate debtor after approval of the
resolution plan;
(d) the implementation and supervision of the
resolution plan;
(e) does not contravene any of the provisions of
the law for the time being in force;
(J) conforms to such other requirements as may
be specified by the Board.
(3)
The resolution professional shall present to the
committee of creditors for its approval such resolution
plans which confirm the conditions referred to in sub-
section (2).
(4)The committee of creditors may approve a
resolution plan by a vote of not less than seventy-five
per cent. of voting share of the financial creditors.
(5) The resolution applicant may attend the meeting of
the committee of creditors in which the resolution plan
of the applicant is considered:
14
Provided that the resolution applicant shall not
have a right to vote at the meeting of the committee of
creditors unless such resolution applicant is also a
financial creditor.
(6) The resolution professional shall submit the
resolution plan as approved by the committee of
creditors to the Adjudicating Authority."
15. As noticed above, the Adjudicating Authority, thereafter, if satisfied
with resolution plan approved by the committee of creditors and meets
the requirements as referred to in sub-section (2) of section 30, it shall
by order may approve the resolution plan in terms of sub-section (1) of
Section 31, which reads as follows: -
"31. Approval of resolution plan. - (1) If the Adjudicating
Authority is satisfied that the resolution plan as approved
by the committee of creditors under sub-section (4) of section
30 meets the requirements as referred to in sub-section (2)
of section 30, it shall by order approve the resolution plan
which shall be binding on the corporate debtor and its
employees, members, creditors, guarantors and other
stakeholders involved in the resolution plan. Submission of
resolution plan. Approval of resolution plan.
(2) Where the Adjudicating Authority is satisfied that the
resolution plan does not confirm to the requirements 15
referred to in sub-section (1), it may, by an order, reject the
resolution plan.
(3) After the order of approval under sub-section (1),--
(a) the moratorium order passed by the Adjudicating
Authority under section 14 shall cease to have effect;
and
(b) the resolution professional shall forward all
records relating to the conduct of the corporate
insolvency resolution process and the resolution plan
to the Board to be recorded on its database."
16. Only if the resolution plan does not confirm the requirements
referred to in sub-section (1) of Section 31, the Adjudicating Authority
may reject the same. However, if approval of plan under sub-section (1)
of Section 31 is granted, the Moratorium order passed by the
Adjudicating Authority under Section 14 shall cease to have its effect in
view of sub-section (3) of Section 31.
17. In the present case, it is informed that in terms of Section 21 the
meeting of the Committee of Creditors has taken place. Meeting of the
Committee of Creditors as required under section 24 after notice has also
taken place, as informed by. Interim Resolution Professional. 16
18. All the information having received by 'Insolvency Resolution
Professional' after publication of notice in the newspaper and all creditors
having satisfied, except Punjab National Bank who has reported that
there is no default and they intend to proceed with their business with
the 'Corporate Debtor', the 'Insolvency Resolution Professional' is
required to prepare a memorandum to that extent under section 29 of the
I & B Code. Thereafter, in case(s) where all creditors have been satisfied
and there is no default with any other creditor, the formality of
submission of resolution plan under section 30 or its approval under
section 31 is required to be expedited on the basis of plan if prepared. In
such case, the Adjudicating Authority without waiting for 180 days of
resolution process, may approve resolution plan under section 31, after
recording its satisfaction that all creditors have been paid/ satisfied and
any other creditor do not claim any amount in absence of default and
required to close the Insolvency Resolution Process. On the other hand,
in case the Adjudicating Authority do not approve resolution plan, will
proceed in accordance with law.
19. It is made clear that Insolvency Resolution Process is not a recovery
proceeding to recover the dues of the creditors. I & B Code, 2016 is an
Act relating to reorganisation and insolvency resolution of corporate
persons, partnership firms and individuals in a time bound manner for
maximisation of value of assets of such persons and to promote
entrepreneurship, availability of credit and balance the interests of all the
stakeholders including the Government dues. Such being the object of 17
the I & B Code 2016, if the interest of all the stakeholders are balanced
and satisfied then to promote entrepreneurship and to ensure that the
company continue to function as on going concern, it is desirable to close
such proceeding without delay and going into technical rigour of one or
other provisions, which are all otherwise futile for all purpose.
20. In the circumstances, instead of interfering with the impugned
order, we remit the case to the Adjudicating Authority for its satisfaction
whether the interest of all stakeholders have been satisfied and whether
one or other creditor has not raised any claim like Punjab National Bank,
alter giving notice to individual claimant and taking into consideration of
the Insolvency Resolution plan and report of the Insolvency Resolution
Professional as may be prepared, the Adjudicating Authority may close
the proceedings.
21. Hope and trust that all the formalities will be completed by group
of 'Financial Creditors' and Insolvency Resolution Professional
expeditiously and the Adjudicating Authority will pass appropriate order,
in accordance with law after notice of hearing the parties
22. The appeal stands disposed of with aforesaid observations and
directions. However, in the facts and circumstances, there shall be no
order as to cost.
(Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya) Chairperson
ar
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free