Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Principal International India Limited, UK — Combination C-2018/01/543

Competition Commission Of India15 January 2018

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The Commission approves a notified combination under section 31(1) of the Act where, having considered the notice and assessed the combination against the factors in section 20(4), it is of the opinion that the combination is not likely to have any appreciable adverse effect on competition in India. Applying that test, the Commission held that a transfer of the minority stakes held by PNB, which left Target AMC and Target Trustee under the sole control of the Principal Financial Group rather than its joint control with PNB, and which would not alter market dynamics, was not likely to have any such effect. The approval is conditional: it stands revoked if the information furnished by the parties is later found to be incorrect.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

Fair CompetitionFor Greater GoodCOMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA15th January, 2018

Notice under Section 6 (2) of the Competition Act, 2002 filed by Principal International India Limited.

CORAM:

Mr.Devender Kumar Sikri Chairperson

Mr. Sudhir Mital Member

Mr. Augustine Peter Member Mr. U.C. Nahta Member

G. P. Mittal Member

Authorised Representative: Principal Consulting (India) Private Limited

Order under Section 31(1) of the Competition Act, 2002

1. On 2nd January, 2018, the Competition Commission of India received a notice filed by Principal International India Limited (“Principal”/“Acquirer”) under sub-section 2 of Section 6 of the Competition Act, 2002 (“Act”) pursuant to: (a) Share Purchase Agreement dated 19th December, 2017 entered into and amongst Principal, Principal Financial Group (Mauritius)

COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA For Greater Good Limited (“PFGM”), Punjab National Bank (“PNB”) and Principal Pnb Asset Management Company Private Limited (“Target AMC”); (b) Share Purchase Agreement dated 19th December, 2017 entered into and amongst Principal, PFGM, PNB and Principal Trustee Company Private Limited (“Target Trustee”) (hereinafter, Principal, Target AMC, Target Trustee, and sponsorship, trusteeship and management of the Principal Mutual Fund (“Target MF”) are collectively referred to as “Parties”).

2. At the time of filing of notice, Acquirer gave an undertaking to provide certain information which was not available in the notice; the Acquirer submitted the same on 08th January, 2018.

3. The proposed combination relates to acquisition of 21.38 percent and 30 percent of the equity share capital of Target AMC and Target Trustee, respectively by the Acquirer from PNB.

4. Principal, an investment company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Principal Financial Services Asia Limited, which is a subsidiary of Principal Financial Services Inc., USA (“PFSI”), an entity belonging to Principal Financial Group of United States of America (“Principal Financial Group”). Principal Financial Group is the sponsor of the Target MF. It is stated that PFGM, a subsidiary of PFSI, already owns 78.62 percent and 70 percent of the equity share capital of the Target AMC and of Target Trustee respectively.

5. Target AMC, a private limited company, is a joint venture between PFGM (78.62 percent) and PNB (21.38 percent). It is asset management company of the Target MF and registered with the Securities and Exchange Board of India.

6. Target Trustee, a private limited company, is a joint venture between PFGM (70 percent) and PNB (30 percent), and provides trustee services to the Target MF.

7. The Commission observed that Target AMC and Target Trustee are under the joint control of Principal Financial Group and PNB. Post the proposed combination, the ownership and control of Target AMC, Target Trustee Company and Target MF will be under the sole control of Principal Financial Group, through its group companies. The Commission also observed that there will not be any change in market dynamics as a result of proposed combination.

COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA For Greater Good

8. Considering the facts on record, details provided in the notice given under sub-section (2) of Section 6 of the Act and assessment of the proposed combination on the basis of the factors stated in sub-section (4) of Section 20 of the Act, the Commission is of the opinion that the proposed combination is not likely to have any appreciable adverse effect on competition in India and therefore, the Commission, hereby, approves the same under sub-section (1) of Section 31 of the Act.

9. This order shall stand revoked if, at any time, the information provided by the Parties is found to be incorrect.

10. The information provided by the parties shall be treated as confidential in terms of and subject to the provisions of Section 57 of the Act.

11. The Secretary is directed to communicate to the Acquirer accordingly.

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free