Philia Charitable Society, Alappuzha vs Assessee
- CitationI.T.A. No.430/Coch/2014
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Under section 12AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Commissioner, on an application for registration, must satisfy himself only as to the objects of the society and the genuineness of its activities; he is not to refuse registration on conjecture about the adequacy or scale of the society's activities at its early stage where the activities carried out are charitable in nature and the amounts applied towards the objects are substantial relative to the society's income and expenditure. Where the Commissioner's concern is with matters such as possible violation of section 13(1) or non-application of income in accordance with the objects, those matters are to be addressed through the power to cancel registration under sections 12AA(3) and 12AA(4), and are not a ground for refusing registration at the threshold.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Philia Charitable Society, Vs. The Commissioner of Income-tax, Puthenpurayil, Kottayam. Karthikapally, Alppuzha-690 516. [PAN: AACAP 8936H] (Assessee-Appellant) (Revenue-Respondent)
Assessee by Shri Manoj Peter, CA Revenue by Shri K.K. John, Sr. DR
Date of hearing 13/01/2015 Date of pronouncement 06/03/2015
ORDER
Per CHANDRA POOJARI, Accountant Member:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 31-07-
2014 passed by the CIT, Kottayam rejecting the application for registration u/s.
12AA of the I.T. Act.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a Society registered under
the Travancore-Cochin Literary, Science, Charitable Societies Registration Act, 1955
on 26-06-2013. The Society has filed an application in the prescribed Form 10A on
26-03-2014 for registration u/s. 12AA of the I.T. Act, 1961. 2 I.T.A. No.430/Coch/2014
3. Though the objectives for which the Society was constituted are mainly
charitable in nature, the CIT noticed that the assessee Society's activities so far was
not upto the mark and not in consistent with the objectives for which it has been
formed. On going through the financial statements produced before him, the CIT
found that the Society is in short of funds for undertaking the objectives enshrined
in the Memorandum of Association. Therefore, the CIT was not satisfied that this is
a fit case for granting registration u/s. 12AA of the I.T. Act. Against this, the
assessee is in appeal before us.
4. The Ld. DR relied on the order of the CIT.
5. We have heard both the parties and perused the record. The question
which has arisen in the present case is as to whether registration has rightly
been refused to the assessee by the learned CIT u/s. 12AA of the I.T. Act.
Section 12AA of the I.T. Act, prescribes the procedure for registration of a
Society. As per this section, the CIT, on receipt of an application for registration,
shall call for such documents or information from the Society as he thinks
necessary in order to satisfy himself about the genuineness of the Society and
may also make such enquiry as he may deem necessary in this behalf; and that
after satisfying himself about the objects of the Society and the genuineness of
its activities, he shall pass an order in writing, registering the Society. Therefore,
in accordance with Section 12AA of the Act, the learned CIT was required to 3 I.T.A. No.430/Coch/2014
satisfy himself about the objects of the Society and the genuineness of the
activities carried out by the assessee.
6. In the present case, a perusal of the order of the CIT suggest that he is
not satisfied about the charitable activities carried out by the assessee. In his
opinion, it is not upto the mark and not in consistent with the objects for which it
has been formed. According to the CIT, the assessee is in short of funds for
carrying out the objects for which it was constituted. This observation of the
CIT has been rebutted by the assessee's Counsel that the assessee has carried
out the activities in accordance with the object clause in the Memorandum of
Association and bye-laws of the Society. It was submitted before us that the
Society was formed under the Travancore-Cochin Literary, Scientific, Charitable
Societies Registration Act, 1955 on 26-06-2013 The assessee has filed before
us Receipts and Payments Account, Income and Expenditure statement, Cash
Flow statement and Balance Sheet as on 31st March, 2014. The assessee has
received Rs. 6,25,000/- as contribution towards corpus fund. As per clause 12(a)
of the Memorandum of Association, amount received as share should be
deposited with a national bank or a scheduled bank and the annual interest
received from it should be used. As per this clause, the assessee has spent an
amount of Rs.76,300/- toward the main objects of the Society for which it was
formed. According to the assessee's Counsel, the findings recorded by the CIT
that the activity carried out by the assessee is not up to the mark, is not correct. 4 I.T.A. No.430/Coch/2014
We find force in the contention of the assessee' Counsel that the assessee is in
the initial stage and the total income of the assessee from 26th June 2013 to 31st
March, 2014 is Rs.1,37,585/-. The assessee earned interest at Rs.32,481/-. The
total expenditure was Rs.99,328/-. The assessee has spent Rs.76,300/- towards
the object of the Society for which it was formed. The assessee has spent the
interest earned on fixed deposits and sought financial help from various
individuals and organizations towards its object of carrying out charitable
activities. Being so, it cannot be said that the activity of the assessee is not upto
the mark. We have to bear in mind that the assessee is at the early stage of
formation and the assessee has incurred administrative expenses to run the
Society. In the above circumstances, in our opinion, the amount spent by the
assessee towards the object of the Society is very considerable and there is no
allegation by the CIT that the activity of the assessee is not charitable. Once the
activity is charitable and it has been carried out by the assessee during this
period, in our opinion, rejection of grant of registration u/s. 12AA by the CIT is
not justified. The CIT is only required to satisfy himself with regard to the objects
and genuineness of the activities of the Society. The observation made by the
CIT does not impinge upon these aspects and the observation made by the CIT
is the result of mere surmises and conjectures. Nothing turns on it against the
assessee for granting registration u/s. 12AA of the I.T. Act. In view of the
above, it is proper to grant registration u/s. 12AA of the I.T. Act to the assessee 5 I.T.A. No.430/Coch/2014
and accordingly, registration u/s. 12AA of the I.T. Act shall be granted to the
assessee by CIT.
7. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed.
Pronounced in the open court on 06-03-2015.
by separate order sd/- (N.R.S.GANESAN) (CHANDRA POOJARI) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Place: Kochi Dated: 06/03/2015 GJ Copy to:
1. Philia Charitable Society, Puthenpurayil, Karthikapally, Alppuzha-690 516.
2. The Commissioner of Income-tax, Kottayam.
3. D.R., I.T.A.T., Cochin Bench, Cochin.
4. Guard File.
By Order
(ASSISTANT REGISTRAR) I.T.A.T., Cochin 6 I.T.A. No.430/Coch/2014
By N.R.S Ganesan
8. I have carefully gone through the translated copy of the trust
deed available at page 15 of the paper book. The membership of
the society shall be given to those who are paying Rs.25,000. The
members, in addition to Rs.25,000 shall also pay monthly
subscription of Rs.100. The society has following objects as per its
bye laws.
a. To provide financial or other aid to the sick and the helpless;
b. To construct and provide houses, or to provide financial assistance for constructing houses for the homeless. To provide help for repair existing houses.
c. To ensure education for those children who ar2e unable to study due to financial problems by providing financial help for their education;
d. To establish and run hospitals, service centres, old age homes, orphanages, training centres for the physically and mentally challenged, general educational institution or to provide financial assistance to such institutions;
7 I.T.A. No.430/Coch/2014
e. To provide financial help for self-employment ventures;
f. To organize public awareness campaign and medical camps;
g. To conduct programs for protecting the widows, helpless women and children;
h. To acquire or lease or rent or transfer or construct or repair or even sell all or any part of the movable and immovable property of above society necessary or convenient for purpose of the attainment of the society's objects;
i. To provide necessary help for matters that require immediate attention under special circumstances; j. To provide financial assistance for marriage; k. To undertake activities for the physical and mental development of the members of the society and their family members;
l. In addition the Society may implement any matters decided by its General Body for the social benefit.
9. The beneficiaries of the society is not specified in the bye
laws. Therefore, the presumption would that the entire society at
large would be the beneficiaries. On a query from the bench
whether any prohibition for the members of the society from sharing
the profit at the end of the year, the ld.representative, Shri Manoj
Peter fairly admitted that there is no prohibition in the bye laws of the 8 I.T.A. No.430/Coch/2014
society to share the profit at the year end. However, after referring
to the bye laws 10(2)(f) on page 18 the ld.representative clarified
that at the time of dissolution the assets of the society will not be
distributed to the members of the society. The asset, however,
would be transferred to another registered society with similar object
or to the government in accordance with provisions of Travancore-
cochin Literary, Scientific and Charitable Societies Registration Act,
1995 (Act XII of 1955). It has to be kept in mind that the members of
the society shall not take any profit from the society in view of the
prohibition contained in section 13(1)(c) of the Act. The legislature
by way of amendment has introduced section 12AA(3) and 12AA(4)
empowering the respective Commissioner of Income-tax to cancel
the registration in case there was a violation of section 13(1) of the
Act. Therefore, I am of the considered opinion that the concerned
Administrative Commissioner / Principal Commissioner and the
assessing officer shall ensure that no part of the society's fund is
distributed to the benefit of the persons referred to in section 13(3) of
the Act either directly or indirectly. If any part of the profit / income of
the society was found to be applied for or taken / shared by the
members of the society the benefit of interested person as referred
in section 13(3) either directly or indirectly, the Commissioner or 9 I.T.A. No.430/Coch/2014
Principal Commissioner shall take immediate action for cancellation
of the registration u/s 12AA / 12AA(3) of the Act.
10. The so-called corpus of the fund is nothing but the contribution
received by the society from its members at the time of admission.
The assessee claims that the share amount collected to the extent of
Rs.6,25,000 from its members at the time of admission was
deposited in the bank account and the interest therefrom was used
for carrying out the object of the trust as provided in bye law 12 of
the Society. Apart from contributions from the members, the society
has also received money from non members on the occasions like
birthdays, weddings, etc. The income and expenditure account,
copy of which is available at page 24 shows that the assessee has
also received Rs.2,510 from auction. It is not known what was the
nature of auction. The commissioner shall ensure that if the
assessee is involved in carrying out any activity in the nature of trade
or commerce, then the income of the society shall not be excluded
as per sections 11 & 12 of the Act in view of section 13(8) of the Act
which was introduced by Finance Act, 2012 with retrospective effect
from 01-04-2009. From the material available on record it appears
that the assessee has spent to the extent of Rs.76,300 by way of
donation to various persons, the details of which are available at 10 I.T.A. No.430/Coch/2014
pages 82 and 83 of the paper book. The Commissioner and the
assessing officer shall ensure that the beneficiaries, the details of
which are available at pages 82 & 83 are not the relatives of the
persons s provided in Explanation 1 to section 13(3) of the Act.
11. The Commissioner has not examined these aspects while
passing the impugned order. Since the legislature has made
specific provisions for cancellation of the registration u/s 12(3) and
12(4) of the Act, wherever the trust / society failed to carry out its
activity in accordance with its objects or carrying on is object in
violation of section 13(1) of the Act, the Commissioner can examine
the same at a later stage and cancel the registration, if any, granted.
The assessing officer in addition to these, shall also examine if there
is any violation of sections 11 and 12 of the Act.
12. In view of the safeguard provided under the Act by giving
liberty to the Commissioner to examine the matter at a later stage
and cancel; the registration, I agree with the view of the
Ld.Accountant Member. However, it is made clear that this order of
this Tribunal shall not stand in the way of the Commissioner while
initiating proceedings for cancellation of the registration u/s 12AA(3)
or 12AA(4). In other words, irrespective of the order of this Tribunal, 11 I.T.A. No.430/Coch/2014
if the Commissioner found that there is a case for cancellation of the
registration u/s 12AA(3) or 12AA(4), he may suo motu initiate the
proceedings for cancellation of registration. Moreover, the
Commissioner and the assessing officer shall ensure that the
registration granted to the society u/s 12AA shall not be used as a
vehicle for collecting money compulsorily in the guise of voluntary
donation.
13. With the above observations, the appeal of the assessee
stands allowed.
Order pronounced in the open court on this _6th____March, 2015.
sd/-
(N.R.S. Ganesan) JUDICIAL MEMBER Cochin, Dt : 6th March, 2015 pk/-
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free