Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Pasupati Fabrics Ltd. vs Sebi

Securities Appellate Tribunal20 January 2023Tarun Agarwala

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The penalty imposed under the SEBI Act for non-compliance with a complaint on the SCORES platform, a facility provided for redressal of complaints against listed companies, cannot be sustained where the company has been delisted before the order was passed, because a delisted company falls outside the purview of the SEBI Act and the regulatory actions made thereunder.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNALMUMBAI

Date of Decision : 20.01.2023

Misc. Application No. 1706 of 2022 And Appeal No. 984 of 2022

Pasupati Fabrics Ltd. Flat No. 112, Competent House, F-14, Connaught Place, New Delhi - 110 001. .....Appellant

Versus Securities and Exchange Board of India SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G-Block, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400 051. ... Respondent

Mr. Anil Kumar Jain, Company Secretary for the Appellant.

Mr. Sumit Rai, Advocate for the Respondent.

CORAM : Justice Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer Ms. Meera Swarup, Technical Member

Per : Justice Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer (Oral)

1.

Cause shown is sufficient. The order dated

December 5, 2022 is recalled. The restoration application is

allowed. The appeal is restored to its original number. 2

2. We have heard Shri Anil Kumar Jain, Company

Secretary for the appellant. We find from a perusal of the

impugned order dated February 9, 2018 that the penalty was

imposed for non-compliance of complaint on the SCORES

platform. This facility was provided for redressal of complaint

against listed companies. From the perusal of record we find

that appellant Company was delisted on May 12, 2017 which

is not disputed by the respondent. As a result of this delisting,

the Company went outside the purview of the SEBI Act and

the regulatory actions made thereunder.

3. In view of the aforesaid, the impugned order cannot be

sustained and is quashed. The appeal is allowed.

4. This order will be digitally signed by the Private

Secretary on behalf of the bench and all concerned parties are

directed to act on the digitally signed copy of this order.

Certified copy of this order is also available from the Registry

on payment of usual charges.

Justice Tarun Agarwala Presiding Officer

Ms. Meera Swarup Technical Member 20.01.2023 MADHUKAR Digitally signed by MADHUKAR SHAMRAO SHAMRAO BHALBAR msb BHALBAR Date: 2023.01.20 17:29:35 +05'30'

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free