Parvinder Singh Khurana vs Kamal Agarwal & Ors
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.1296 of 2023
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Appellate Tribunal will not entertain, in an appeal against an adjudicating authority's order, documents that were not placed before the adjudicating authority; a party cannot rely on such material for the first time in appeal. Where a party has been afforded repeated opportunities by the adjudicating authority to file its reply and synopsis and has failed to avail them, it is not entitled to indulgence on appeal, and the appeal against the adverse order is dismissed.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Parvinder Singh Khurana ...Appellant
Versus
Kamal Agarwal Liquidator Khullar Hospitality & Ors. ...Respondents
Present: For Appellant: Mr. Harshvardhan Pandey, Mr. Rohish Arora, Advocates. For Respondents: Mr. Saurabh Kalia and Ms. Shakshi Kaushik, Advocates for R-2.
ORDER
03.10.2023: Heard learned counsel for the Appellant as well as learned
counsel appearing for the Respondent No.2. This Appeal has been filed against
order dated 27.07.2023 by which order I.A. No. 2413 of 2020 filed by the
RP/Liquidator has been allowed. Appellant aggrieved by the order has come
up in this Appeal.
2. Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that he could not have full
representation before the Adjudicating Authority, hence, he could not file
reply.
3. Learned counsel for the Respondent No.2 pointed out that Appellant was
given opportunity to file reply. The application is pending since year 2020 and
Appellant did not file reply inspite of opportunity granted by the Adjudicating
Authority. The Adjudicating Authority also granted opportunity to file a
synopsis which also he could not file.
Cont'd.../ -2-
4. Learned counsel for the Appellant relying on certain documents filed in
this Appeal as Annexure E contends that vehicles were also sold.
5. Learned counsel for the Respondent rightly submits that these
documents were not before the Adjudicating Authority and the Appellant
cannot be allowed to rely on the said documents filed in this Appeal.
5. We are of the view that when inspite of opportunities granted by the
Adjudicating Authority, Appellant could not avail the opportunity, he is not
entitled for any indulgence in this Appeal. Appeal is dismissed.
[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson
[Barun Mitra] Member (Technical)
[Arun Baroka] Member (Technical) Archana/nn
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.1296 of 2023
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free