Order in the matter of buy back of securities in Coal India Limited
- CitationWTM/GM/CFD/91/2018–19
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where the promoter's transfer of shares under a government disinvestment programme falls within the interregnum prohibited by Regulation 24(i)(e) of the Buy-back Regulations 2018, the prohibition's purpose is to bar promoter dealing during the period between the board resolution and closure of the offer. If the buy-back is otherwise in the interest of investors and the securities market, it is not appropriate to stop the buy-back on that account, and the Board may relax the condition in Regulation 24(i)(e) under Reg
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
WTM/GM/CFD/91/2018–19 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ORDER UNDER SECTION 11(1) OF THE SEBI ACT READ WITH REGULATION 28 OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (BUY–BACK OF SECURITIES) REGULATIONS, 2018. IN THE MATTER OF BUY BACK OF SECURITIES IN – COMPANY COAL INDIA LIMITED
BACKGROUND –
1. Coal India Limited (“Coal India/Company”) is a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 in the year 1973 and was inter alia subsequently converted into a public limited company on February 24, 2010. The registered office of Coal India is at Premises no. 4– MAR, Plot no. AF–III, Action Area–1A, Newtown, Rajarhat, Kolkata–700156. The shares of Coal India are listed on the BSE Limited (“BSE”) and the National Stock Exchange of India Limited (“NSE”).
2. Coal India had filed an Application dated February 12, 2019 (“Application”) seeking exemption/relaxation from the strict enforcement of the requirement contained under Regulation 24(i)(e) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Buy–back of Securities) Regulations, 2018 (“Buy–back Regulations 2018”). The aforesaid Application has been necessitated on account of a proposed transfer of equity shares of the Company (which are held by the Promoter i.e. the Government of India) in February 2019, in relation to the Bharat 22 Exchange Traded Fund Scheme (“Bharat 22 ETF Scheme”), which is brought out in the subsequent paragraphs of this Order.
3. From the Application and the draft Letter of Offer (filed with SEBI on February 7, 2019) and other correspondences received by SEBI from Coal India, the following is noted –
A. Pursuant to Article 23 of the Articles of Association of the Company; Sections 68, 69, 70 of the Companies Act, 2013; the provisions of Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rule, 2014 to the extent applicable and in compliance with the Buy–back Regulations 2018, the Board of Directors of Coal India in a meeting held on February 4, 2019, had approved the buy–back of 4,46,80,850 equity shares [representing 9.86% (on a standalone basis)/6.46% (on Order in the matter of Coal India Limited a consolidated basis) of the aggregate of fully paid–up equity capital and free reserves as on 31.03.2018 and 0.72% of its total paid–up equity capital] of the Company @ ₹235 per share for an aggregate consideration not exceeding ₹1050 Crores. The proposed buy–back shall be from the existing shareholders including the Promoter through the ‘tender offer’ route under the Buy–back Regulations 2018.
B. Thereafter, the Company made a public announcement of the above mentioned proposed buy–back on February 6, 2019, in accordance with Regulation 7(i) read with Schedule II of the Buy–back Regulations 2018.
C. The shareholding pattern in Coal India as on (i) February 15, 2019 (record date) i.e. prior to the proposed buy–back and (ii) post the proposed buy–back, is provided as under –
TABLE I – SHAREHOLDING IN THE TARGET COMPANY (SOURCE: APPLICATION) CATEGORY PRIOR TO PROPOSED BUY– #POST PROPOSED BUY–BACK BACK AS ON 15.02.2019 NO. OF SHARES NO. OF SHARES AND % AND % A. PROMOTER AND PROMOTER 4,52,56,82,514 4,49,75,92,682 GROUP [72.91%] [72.98%] B. PUBLIC SHAREHOLDING 1,68,17,26,663 1,66,51,35,645 [27.09%] [27.02%] C. GRAND TOTAL (A + B) 6,20,74,09,177 6,16,27,28,327 [100%] [100%] #Assuming full acceptance of equity shares in the buy–back offer as per the Entitlement Ratio.
D. As part of its disinvestment programme, the Government of India had in 2017 approved the setting up of Bharat 22 ETF Scheme comprising of equity shares of Central Public Sector Enterprises (“CPSEs”). Accordingly, the Scheme was launched by way of a new fund offer (“NFO”) and the units of the Scheme were listed on the stock exchanges in the form of an exchange traded fund tracking the S&P BSE Bharat 22 Index. A further fund offer was launched in 2018 (“FFO 1”). In accordance with an e–mail dated February 12, 2019, from the Government of India, it is understood that the Government intends to transfer further CPSE shares to the Scheme for which a further fund offer (“FFO 2”) is expected to be announced which will result in the President of India (acting through different departments and ministries) selling shares of the constituent companies of the S&P BSE Bharat 22 Index.
4. In addition to the Application, SEBI had also received a letter dated February 4, 2019, from the Ministry of Finance, Government of India inter alia stating that the abovementioned disinvestment may take place inter alia during the intervening period between the Board Resolution of the Company authorizing the buy–back and the closure of such buy–back as specified in Regulation 24(i)(e) of the Buy–back Regulations 2018. Further, vide an e–mail dated February 18, 2019, the Government of India informed SEBI that “the Additional Offering Period of Bharat 22 ETF was opened and closed on February 14, 2019. Coal India is part of the basket of Bharat 22 ETF and as per SEBI guidelines, units are required to be allotted to the investors within 5 working days from the closure of offer. AMC has proposed to transfer the funds to Government of India’s account on February 21, 2019, immediately after which, shares of the underlying companies have to be transferred to AMC for further allotment to investors.”
5. I have considered the Application made by Coal India along with all the material available on record. For the purpose of considering the instant Application, Regulation 24(i)(e) of the Buy–back Regulations 2018 is reproduced as under – “24. Obligations of the company for all buy-back procedure: (i) The company shall ensure that – … e) the promoter(s) or his/their associates shall not deal in the shares or other specified securities of the company in the stock exchange or off-market, including inter–se transfer of shares among the promoters during the period from the date of passing the resolution of the board of directors or the special resolution, as the case may be, till the closing of the offer. …”
6. In its Application, Coal India had informed SEBI that it proposes to transfer equity shares of the Company (which are held by the Promoter i.e. the Government of India) pursuant to FFO 2 of Bharat 22 ETF Scheme. Upon a consideration of the aforementioned in light of Regulation 24(i)(e) of the Buy–back Regulations 2018, it is noted that the proposed transfer of the aforesaid equity shares by the Promoters will occur during the period between the date of passing the Resolution of the Board of Directors approving the offer of buy–back of securities of the Company (i.e. February 4, 2019) and the closure of such offer.
7. As per Regulation 28 of the Buy–back Regulations 2018, the Board may, in the interest of investors and the securities market, relax the strict enforcement of any requirement of the aforesaid Regulations except the provisions incorporated from the Companies Act, if the Board is satisfied that the requirement is procedural in nature or the requirement may cause undue hardship to investors. I note that the requirement contained in Regulation 24(i)(e) of the Buy–back Regulations
2018 is substantive in nature and imposes an obligation on the Company to ensure that its Promoter(s) do not deal in the shares of the company in the stock exchange or off-market including inter–se transfer of shares among themselves during the period from the date of passing the resolution of the Board of Directors till closing of the buy–back Offer. At the same time, I note that the proposed transfer of equity shares of Coal India by its Promoter in relation to the Bharat 22 ETF Scheme is necessitated as part of the ongoing disinvestment programme formulated by the Government of India.
8. In addition, in its draft Letter of Offer, Coal India has stated that the proposed buy–back will inter alia result in the following – a. In the proposed buy–back, 15% (fifteen percent) of the number of equity shares which the Company proposes to buy–back or the number of equity shares entitled as per the shareholders’ holding, whichever is higher, shall be reserved for the small shareholders. The Company believes that this reservation for small shareholders will benefit a large number of public shareholders who would get classified as ‘small shareholders’; b. The buy–back may help in improving the return on equity by reduction in the equity base and other financial ratios thereby leading to long term increase in shareholders’ value, and c. The buy–back gives an option to the eligible shareholders to either participate in the buy–back and receive cash in lieu of equity shares accepted under the buy–back or not participate in the buy–back and enjoy a resultant increase in their percentage shareholding in the Company post the buy–back without any additional investment.
9. Accordingly, I find that the proposed buy–back in the instant case is in the interest of investors and the securities market. As stated earlier, the prohibition under Regulation 24(i)(e) of the Buy–back Regulations 2018 is intended to disallow dealing in securities by the Promoters (or their associates) of the Company proposing to make a buy–back offer during the interregnum period between the date of passing the resolution of the Board of Directors till the closure of the buy–back Offer. In this case, the transfer of securities from the Promoters to Bharat 22 ETF Scheme being part of an ongoing disinvestment programme, I do not find it appropriate to stop the proposed buy–back if it is otherwise for the benefit of the shareholders of Coal India. Hence, in my view, the condition in Regulation 24(i)(e) of the Buy–back Regulations 2018 can stand relaxed.
10. I am therefore, of the considered view that exemption/relaxation as sought for in the instant Application be granted to Coal India. However, such exemption/relaxation shall be subject to certain conditions stated herein. The exemption/relaxation has been granted as per the facts contained in the Application and subsequent correspondences received by SEBI from Coal India and shall not operate as a precedent.
Order –
11. I, in exercise of the powers conferred upon me under Section 11(1) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (“SEBI Act”) and Regulation 28 of the Buy–back Regulations 2018, hereby grant exemption/relaxation to the Company, viz. Coal India from ensuring compliance with the requirement of Regulation 24(i)(e) of the Buy–back Regulations 2018 in relation to the proposed buy–back of 4,46,80,850 equity shares of the Company as mentioned in the Application.
12. The exemption so granted is subject to the following conditions:
i. The proposed buy–back shall be in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, the Buy–back Regulations 2018 and any other applicable law. ii. The statements/ averments made or facts and figures mentioned in the Application are true and correct.
13. The exemption granted above is limited to a relaxation from the strict enforcement of Regulation 24(i)(e) of the Buy–back Regulations 2018 and shall not be construed as a relaxation from any other requirement under the Buy–back Regulations 2108 or the provisions incorporated therein from the Companies Act, 2013.
14. The Application dated February 12, 2019, filed by Coal India is accordingly disposed of.
Place: Mumbai G. MAHALINGAM Date: February 20, 2019 WHOLE TIME MEMBER SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free