Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Order in the matter of Bagri Minerals and Chemicals Limited

Securities And Exchange Board Of India18 March 2016

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

Where a noticee has been served with a show cause notice and given repeated opportunities to reply and to be heard, and has neither replied nor appeared, the adjudicating authority may decide the matter on the material on record. A listed company that has not obtained SCORES authentication as required by SEBI's circular, and that has left investor complaints unresolved despite SEBI's repeated advice, is in breach of its obligation under section 11 of the SEBI Act to redress investor grievances in accordance with SEBI's advice and directions. Such a failure by a listed company adversely affects investor confidence in the securities market, and is therefore a sufficient basis for directions under section 11B of the SEBI Act restraining the company from accessing the securities market and from buying, selling or dealing in securities until it obtains SCORES authentication and resolves the pending investor grievances.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

WTM/RKA/EFD/38/2016 BEFORE THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ORDER UNDER SECTION 11B OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992 In respect of Bagri Minerals and Chemicals Limited 1. Bagri Minerals and Chemicals Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'Bagri Minerals' or ‘the company’) is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at 56, II, Bhoiwada, Mumbai – 400 002 Maharashtra. The shares of the company are listed on Ahmedabad Stock Exchange Limited. 2. SEBI vide its circular no. CIR/OIAE/1/2012 dated August 13, 2012 directed all companies whose securities are listed on stock exchanges to obtain SCORES authentication by September 14, 2012. However, since certain companies including Bagri Minerals did not obtain SCORES authentication within the time period specified in the aforementioned circular, a public notice was issued on January 13, 2013, advising inter alia the companies to obtain SCORES authentication within seven days from the date of the advertisement, failing which SEBI would be constrained to initiate appropriate enforcement actions. However, the company still failed to obtain SCORES authentication. It was also observed that three investor complaints were pending against the company. SEBI vide its letter dated February 15, 2013 once again advised the company to obtain SCORES authentication and to redress the investor complaints pending against it. 3. Since the company did not obtain SCORES authentication and failed to redress the investor grievances, SEBI issued Show Cause Notices (SCN) dated March 28, 2013 to the company, calling upon it to show cause as to why suitable directions including direction to restrain it from accessing the securities market for a specified period should not be passed under section 11B of the SEBI Act. However, the SCN returned undelivered from the registered office address of the company, with a remark "not known'. The SCN was resent to the company on May 02, 2014 through registered post, however the SCN again returned undelivered. Subsequently, the SCN was served upon the company on its registered office address by way of affixture on October 09, 2014. However, the company did not submit its reply to the SCN.

In the matter of Bagri Minerals and Chemicals Limited

4. Opportunity of personal hearing was granted to the company on January 28, 2016 and notice to that effect was served on the company by way of affixture on its registered office address. However, the company chose not to appear for the personal hearing on the scheduled date. I note that sufficient opportunities have been granted to the company and it is not keen to avail the same. I note that the company has not even filed any written reply/submission to the SCN. In view of these facts and circumstances, I deem it appropriate to decide the matter on the basis of material available on record. 5. I note that the company has not obtained SCORES authentication, as required under SEBI circular dated August 13, 2012, till date. I further note from the SCN that there were three investor complaints pending against the company for redressal. 6. I note that the investor complaints are pending unresolved since the year 2002. In addition to the obligations under the provisions of Companies Act, the company is also under an obligation to redress all investor complaints in terms of the advice/directions of SEBI, in view of the provisions of section 11 of the SEBI Act.

However, the company has not shown any tenacity in resolving the investor grievances and in spite of repeated advice of SEBI, the said investor grievances are pending till date. 7. Failure to redress investor grievances, by a listed company adversely affects the confidence of investors in the securities market. In view of the foregoing, I am of the view that it is a fit case to issue appropriate directions under section 11B of the SEBI Act against the company as contemplated in the show cause notice issued to it. I, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred upon me under section 19 of the SEBI Act read with sections 11 and 11B thereof, hereby restrain and prohibit Bagri Minerals and Chemicals Limited from accessing the securities market and from buying, selling or dealing in securities, directly or indirectly, in whatsoever manner, till it obtains SCORES authentication in terms of the SEBI circular dated August 13, 2012 and resolves all the investor grievances pending against it. The aforesaid direction is without prejudice to any other action that may be taken against the company and its directors in accordance with law.

8. This Order shall come into force with immediate effect. A copy of this Order shall also be served upon the depositories and stock exchanges for necessary action.

Sd/-

Date: March 18th, 2016 RAJEEV KUMAR AGARWAL Place: Mumbai WHOLE TIME MEMBER SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free