Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Order in respect of Indo American Cement Corporation Ltd

Securities And Exchange Board Of India29 June 2016

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

A listed company and its directors who, after sufficient opportunity, neither appear at the personal hearing nor file any reply to show cause notices may be proceeded against on the basis of the material on record. A listed company's obligation to redress investor complaints arises under the advice and directions issued by the regulator under section 11 of the SEBI Act, in addition to its obligations under the Companies Act. Complaints left unresolved for years despite repeated advice from the regulator constitute a continuing failure to discharge that obligation. Failure by a listed company to redress investor grievances adversely affects investor confidence in the securities market, and is therefore a fit case for directions under section 11B of the SEBI Act. Such directions may restrain the company and its directors from accessing the securities market and from buying, selling or dealing in securities, directly or indirectly, until the company obtains SCORES authentication and resolves the pending grievances.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

WTM/RKA/EFD/DRA II/74/2016 BEFORE THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ORDER UNDER SECTION 11B OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992 In respect of (1) Indo American Cement Corporation Limited and its directors namely, (2) Mr. Ramdev Vallabh Pittie, (3) Mr. Subhashchandra Chauhan, and (4) Mr. Amar Singh 1. Indo American Cement Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred to as ‘the company’) is a listed company having its registered office address at Village & P.O. Khejarla, Ransigaon Road, Teh. Bilara, Dist. Jodhpur, Rajasthan - 342601. SEBI vide its circular no. CIR/OIAE/1/2012 dated August 13, 2012 directed all listed companies to obtain SEBI Complaints Redress System (SCORES) authentication by September 14, 2012 and to take appropriate necessary steps within seven days of receipt of complaints through SCORES, so as to resolve the complaint within thirty days of its receipt. 2. However, since certain companies, including Indo American Cement Corporation Limited did not obtain SCORES authentication within the time period specified in the aforementioned circular, a public notice was issued on January 13, 2013, advising inter alia the companies to obtain SCORES authentication within seven days from the date of the advertisement, failing which SEBI would be constrained to initiate appropriate enforcement actions.

However, the company still failed to obtain SCORES authentication and resolve pending investor complaints. 3. Since the company did not obtain SCORES authentication and failed to redress eighty nine investor grievances, SEBI issued Show Cause Notices (SCNs) dated March 28, 2013 and October 20, 2014 to the company and its directors namely, Mr. Ramdev Vallabh Pittie, Mr. Subhashchandra Chauhan, and Mr. Amar Singh, respectively (hereinafter collectively referred to as "the noticees") calling upon them to show cause as to why suitable directions including direction to restrain them from accessing the securities market for a specified period should not be passed under section 11B of the SEBI Act. The SCN issued to the company on its registered office address returned In the matter of Indo American Cement Corporation Limited undelivered. Subsequently, the SCN was sent on the last known address of the company. However, the SCNs issued to the company and its directors returned undelivered from their last known addresses. Accordingly, on April 02, 2016 the SCNs were served through affixture on the last known address of the company.

4. Opportunity of personal hearing was granted to the company and its directors on May 10, 2016. The notice to this effect was served through affixture on their last known addresses. However, the company and its directors chose not to appear for the personal hearing on the scheduled date. 5. I note that sufficient opportunities have been granted to the noticees and they are not keen to avail the same. I further note that the noticees have not even filed any written reply/submission to the SCNs. In view of these facts and circumstances, I deem it appropriate to decide the matter on the basis of material available on record. 6. I note that as on June 20, 2016 the company had not obtained SCORES authentication, as required under SEBI circular dated August 13, 2012. I further note that as on June 20, 2016, eighty three out of eighty nine investor complaints as indicated in SCNs were pending against the company for redressal. 7. I note that the investor complaints are pending unresolved since the year 2010. In addition to the obligations under the provisions of Companies Act, the company is also under an obligation to redress all investor complaints in terms of the advice/directions of SEBI, in view of the provisions of section 11 of the SEBI Act.

However, the company has not shown any tenacity in resolving the investor grievances and in spite of repeated advice of SEBI, the said investor grievances are pending till date. 8. Failure to redress investor grievances, by a listed company adversely affects the confidence of investors in the securities market. In view of the foregoing, I am of the view that it is a fit case to issue appropriate directions under section 11B of the SEBI Act against the company and its directors as contemplated in the show cause notices issued to them. I, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred upon me under section 19 of the SEBI Act read with sections 11 and 11B thereof, hereby restrain and prohibit Indo American Cement Corporation Limited and its directors namely, Mr. Ramdev Vallabh Pittie, Mr. Subhashchandra Chauhan, and Mr. Amar Singh from accessing the securities market and from buying, selling or dealing in securities, directly or indirectly, in whatsoever manner, till the company obtains SCORES authentication in terms of the SEBI circular dated August 13, 2012 and resolves all the investor grievances pending against it.

The aforesaid direction is without prejudice to any other action that may be taken against the company and its directors in accordance with law. 9. This Order shall come into force with immediate effect. A copy of this Order shall also be served upon the depositories and stock exchanges for necessary action.

Sd/- Date: June 29th, 2016 RAJEEV KUMAR AGARWAL Place: Mumbai WHOLE TIME MEMBER SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free