Order against directors of Bishal Horticulture and Animal Projects Limited
- CitationWTM/GM/IMD/62/2018–19
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where the Whole Time Member finds, on the basis of earlier findings that an issue of redeemable preference shares qualified as an offer to the public and on MCA21 records and other material, that a person who was a director after the fund mobilisation was responsible for that offer and allotment made in violation of public issue requirements, that person may be treated as responsible for the contravention even though he was not a party to the earlier interim order and his tenure may have ended before the Final Order. Such a finding of responsibility is a sufficient basis for issuing interim directions under Sections 11, 11(4) and 11B of the SEBI Act, restraining the person from accessing or dealing in the securities market and from associating with any listed company or company intending to raise money from the public, pending a show cause inquiry into whether final directions should follow. Where such a noticee neither files a reply nor seeks a personal hearing within the period fixed, the findings become final and absolute against him automatically, and he is b
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
WTM/GM/IMD/62/2018–19 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA INTERIM ORDER CUM SHOW CAUSE NOTICE UNDER SECTIONS 11(1), 11(4), 11A AND 11B OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992, IN THE MATTER OF BISHAL HORTICULTURE AND ANIMAL PROJECTS LIMITED – NOTICEES DIN/CIN PAN DIRECTORS – 1. SUJIT ACHARJEE 05185173 ASZPA9649Q 2. AJOY PAUL 06707622 AMPPP5677D 3. KUNTAL BHATTACHARJEE 06584522 AQMPB2700Q 4. SUMANTA MODAK 06565449 AMHPM3794L 5. LITAN SAHA 06826108 CCQPS8194F
TO BE READ WITH THE SEBI ORDER NO. WTM/PS/34/IMD/ERO–RLO/MAY/2016 DATED MAY 16, 2016.
BACKGROUND –
1. Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”) received a complaint on September 8, 2014, against Bishal Horticulture and Animal Projects Limited (“Bishal Horticulture/Company”). Vide the aforesaid complaint, the complainant therein inter alia alleged illegal mobilization of funds by Bishal Horticulture.
2. SEBI had examined the records available on MCA21 Portal and noted that Bishal Horticulture had issued and allotted Redeemable Preference Shares. Details regarding the aforesaid as available on MCA21 Portal and other relevant material on record are reproduced as under –
A. ALLOTMENT DETAILS OF REDEEMABLE PREFERENCE SHARES – TABLE I – DETAILS OF REDEEMABLE PREFERENCE SHARES ISSUED FINANCIAL YEAR NO. OF ALLOTTEES VALUE OF ALLOTMENT (₹) 2006–07 600 58,00,000 2007–08 1663 1,46,00,000 2009–10 1224 80,00,000
Order in the matter of Bishal Horticulture and Animal Projects Limited
3. Since the aforementioned issue of securities by Bishal Horticulture during the Financial Years 2006–07, 2007–08 and 2009–10 (issue and allotment of Redeemable Preference Shares) qualified as an offer made to the public in terms of Section 67(3) of the Companies Act, 1956 (“Companies Act”), Bishal Horticulture and its Directors were found to have violated the following provisions of law –
A. Section 56, Section 60 read with Section 2(36) and Section 73 of the Companies Act; B. Provisions of the SEBI (Disclosure and Investor Protection) Guidelines, 2000 (“DIP Guidelines”) read with the SEBI (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2009 (“ICDR Regulations”) as regards the Offer of Redeemable Preference Shares during the Financial Years 2006–07 and 2007–08.
4. Accordingly, SEBI vide an Order dated May 16, 2016 (“Final Order”), inter alia directed Bishal Horticulture and its Directors – a. To jointly and severally refund the money collected by the Company through the issuance of Redeemable Preference Shares (which have been found to be issued in contravention of the public issue norms stipulated under the Companies Act and SEBI regulations), to the investors including the money collected from investors, till date, pending allotment of securities, if any, with an interest of 15% per annum compounded at half yearly intervals, from the date when the repayments became due (in terms of Section 73(2) of the Companies Act) to the investors till the date of actual payment. b. Not to, directly or indirectly, access the capital market by issuing prospectus, offer document or advertisement soliciting money from the public and are further restrained and prohibited from buying, selling or otherwise dealing in the securities market, directly or indirectly in whatsoever manner, from the date of this Order till the expiry of 4 years from the date of completion of refunds to investors as directed above.
5. It is observed that prior to the Final Order, SEBI had issued an Ex Parte Interim Order on May 6, 2015 (“Interim Order”), against Bishal Horticulture and its Directors.
Order in the matter of Bishal Horticulture & Animal Projects Limited
6. During the course of the quasi–judicial proceedings conducted prior to the passing of the Final Order, it was brought to the Notice of the then Whole Time Member (“WTM”) that certain entities who were/are Director(s) of Bishal Horticulture were in fact responsible for the offer and allotment of Redeemable Preference Shares. The list of such entities as extracted from the Final Order is shown below –
TABLE II NAME OF THE PERSON CAPACITY DIN PAN DATE OF DATE OF APPT. CESSATION 1. SUJIT ACHARJEE DIRECTOR 05185173 ASZPA9649Q 19.07.2012 10.10.2013 2. AJOY PAUL DIRECTOR 06707622 AMPPP5677D 09.10.2013 26.03.2014 3. KUNTAL BHATTACHARJEE DIRECTOR 06584522 AQMPB2700Q 10.02.2014 26.03.2014 4. SUMANTA MODAK DIRECTOR 06565449 AMHPM3794L 10.02.2014 10.06.2014 5. LITAN SAHA# DIRECTOR 06826108 CCQPS8194F 18.02.2014 26.03.2014 # LITAN SAHA IS AT PRESENT A DIRECTOR IN BISHAL HORTICULTURE HAVING BEEN RE–APPOINTED ON APRIL 27, 2015.
7. Accordingly, SEBI was directed by the WTM in the Final Order to examine the role of the aforementioned entities (who were not covered by the Interim Order) and initiate appropriate action against them, in accordance with law.
8. In this context, SEBI vide letters dated December 28, 2017, had sought inter alia the following information from the abovementioned entities at Table II – i. Copy of Audited Balance Sheet and Annual Returns of the company for the last 3 years. ii. Other Information in respect of issue of Shares/Debentures: a. Copy of Prospectus/Red Herring Prospectus/Statement in lieu of prospectus/Information Memorandum filed with RoC for issuance of Shares/Debentures. b. Date of opening and closing of the subscription list for the said Shares/Debentures. c. Details regarding the number of application forms circulated inviting subscription for Shares/Debentures and number of applications received. d. Details of allottees such as date of allotment, names of allottees, etc. iii. Copies of the minutes of Board/committee meeting in which the resolution has been passed for raising such additional capital and also for allotment of Shares/Debentures.
iv. Copies of application forms, pamphlets, advertisements and other promotional material circulated for issuance of Shares/Debentures. v. Terms and conditions of the issue of Shares/Debentures. vi. Whether the company has applied for listing of its securities with any of the Stock Exchanges. vii. Copies of Form 2 and Form 10 filed with the RoC. viii. Details of debenture trustee viz. name, address, board resolution authorizing their appointment, etc.
9. Details concerning the service of the above–mentioned letters dated December 28, 2017 including subsequent reminders, issued by SEBI and replies received thereto, etc. are provided as under –
TABLE III NAME LETTER STATUS (RETURNED/ DELIVERED)
1. SUJIT ACHARJEE RETURNED UNDELIVERED WITH THE COMMENT “REFUSED”. REMINDER LETTER DATED JANUARY 29, 2018 ISSUED. HOWEVER, NO REPLY RECEIVED. 2. AJOY PAUL DELIVERED. HOWEVER, NO REPLY RECEIVED. REMINDER LETTER DATED JANUARY 11, 2018 ISSUED. HOWEVER, NO REPLY RECEIVED. 3. KUNTAL BHATTACHARJEE RETURNED UNDELIVERED WITH THE COMMENT “LEFT FOR WITHOUT ADDRESS.” 4. SUMANTA MODAK RETURNED UNDELIVERED WITH THE COMMENT “ADDRESSEE CANNOT BE LOCATED”. 5. LITAN SAHA RETURNED UNDELIVERED WITH THE COMMENT “LEFT”. REMINDER LETTER DATED JANUARY 29, 2018 ISSUED TO HIS ALTERNATE ADDRESS. HOWEVER, IT WAS RETURNED UNDELIVERED WITH THE COMMENT “LEFT WITHOUT ADDRESS”.
10. I note that the persons at serial nos. 1–5 of Table II were Directors of Bishal Horticulture, post the fund–mobilization by the Company. Further, the person at serial no. 5 of Table II is at present, a Director of Bishal Horticulture having been re–appointed on April 27, 2015. Upon a consideration of paragraph 3 of this Order, I find that the aforementioned entities are responsible for the offer and allotment of Redeemable Preference Shares made by Bishal Horticulture in violation of the Public Issue requirements. In the light of the aforesaid, I find this to be a fit case to pass interim directions against the aforesaid Director of Bishal Horticulture.
DIRECTIONS –
11. In view of the foregoing, I, in exercise of the powers conferred upon me under Sections 11, 11(4) and 11B of the SEBI Act hereby issue, with immediate effect, the following directions – i. The Directors of Bishal Horticulture, viz. Sujit Acharjee, Ajoy Paul, Kuntal Bhattacharjee, Sumanta Modak and Litan Saha, shall not access the securities market or buy, sell or otherwise deal in the securities market, either directly or indirectly, or associate themselves with any listed company or company intending to raise money from the public; ii. The abovenamed Directors of Bishal Horticulture shall co-operate with SEBI and shall furnish all information/documents in connection with the offer and allotment of Redeemable Preference Shares sought vide letters dated December 28, 2017.
12. The findings at paragraphs 3 and 10 of this Order are made on the basis of the information obtained from MCA21 Portal and other relevant material on record by SEBI, which form the basis of the Final Order dated May 16, 2016. The Directors of Bishal Horticulture, viz. Sujit Acharjee, Ajoy Paul, Kuntal Bhattacharjee, Sumanta Modak and Litan Saha (referred to as “Noticee”), are hereby called upon to show cause as to why suitable directions/prohibitions under Sections 11, 11(4), and 11B of the SEBI Act should not be issued/imposed, including the following direction, viz. – i. To be restrained/prohibited from accessing the securities market and buying, selling or otherwise dealing in securities in any manner whatsoever, directly or indirectly, for a period of four years from the date of the Company and its Directors effecting the refund as directed in the Final Order dated May 16, 2016.
13. The Noticees may, within 21 days from the date of receipt of this Interim Order–cum–Show Cause Notice, file their respective replies. In the event the Noticees intend to avail an opportunity of personal hearing, they may do so by seeking a confirmation in writing from SEBI for the same within 90 days from the date of receipt of this Order. In the event of the respective Noticees failing to file replies or requesting for an opportunity of personal hearing within the said 90 days, the findings at paragraph 10 of this Order shall become final and absolute against the respective Noticees automatically, without any further orders. Consequently, the Noticees shall automatically be bound by the directions contained in paragraphs 11 and 12, as applicable.
14. The Noticees shall comply with the aforesaid directions within a period of 90 days from the date this Order becoming final, failing which SEBI may initiate appropriate enforcement action under SEBI Act including Recovery proceedings, Adjudication or Prosecution in addition to making a suitable reference to State Government/Local Police.
15. This Order is without prejudice to any other action that SEBI may initiate under securities laws, as deemed appropriate.
16. Copy of this Order shall be forwarded to the recognized stock exchanges and depositories for information and necessary action. A copy of this Order may also be forwarded to MCA/concerned RoC for their information and necessary action with respect to the directions imposed on the abovenamed Directors of Bishal Horticulture.
Place: Mumbai G. MAHALINGAM Date: October 10, 2018 WHOLE TIME MEMBER SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free