Nin Marketing Pvt.Ltd.,, Ahmedabad vs Department Of Income Tax
- CitationITA No.3036/Ahd/2011
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Tribunal, having found the identical issue of disallowance of premium on Optionally Fully Convertible Premium Notes already decided in the assessee's favour by the Tribunal for earlier assessment years, holds that it is bound to follow and agrees with that coordinate bench decision, so the same disallowance cannot be sustained for the year under appeal and the Revenue's ground fails.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, अिधकरण, अहमदाबाद यायपीठ ''B'', अहमदाबाद । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT AHMEDABAD, "B" BENCH
सव ौी ौी जी. जी.सी. सी.गु ा, माननीय उपा!य", उपा!य", एवं अिनल चतुवद ' (, (, लेखा सदःय के सम" । BEFORE S/SHRI G.C. GUPTA, VICE-PRESIDENT AND ANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER)
ITA No.3036/Ahd/2011 [Asstt.Year : 2005-2006]
JCIT (OSD) बनाम/Vs. Nir Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Cir.5, Ahmedabad. G-20, New Madhavpura Market Shahibaug Road Ahmedabad 380 004.
PAN: AABCN 4057 G
(अपीलाथ. / Appellant) (ू0यथ. / Respondent)
राजःव क1 ओर से/ : Revenue by Shri Roopchand, Sr.DR िनधा 4रती क1 ओर से/ : Assessee by Ms.Urvashi Sodhan सुनवाई क1 तार(ख/ : Date of Hearing 6th January, 2015 घोषणा क1 तार(ख/ : 02-02-2015 Date of Pronouncement
आदे श / O R D E R
PER G.C. GUPTA, VICE-PRESIDENT: This appeal by the Revenue for the Asstt.Year 2005-2006 is directed against the order of the CIT(A).
2. The only ground of appeal of the Revenue is as under: 1. The CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in deleting the disallowance of Rs.48,55,752/- being amount of premium on Optionally Fully Convertible Premium Notes (OFCPN). ITA No.3036/Ahd/2011
3. The learned DR submitted that the Revenue has not accepted the decision of the ITAT in the assessee's own case in ITA No.3296/Ahd/2004 dated 20-11-2009 and has preferred appeal before the Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court. He relied on the order of the AO. The learned counsel for the assessee has opposed the submissions of the learned DR. He submitted that the issue is covered in favour of the assessee with the decision of the Tribunal in assessee's own case in number of assessment years from 2001-02 to 2004-05, and therefore, the issue should be decided in favour of the assessee.
4. We have considered rival submissions and perused the orders of the AO and the CIT(A). We find that identical issue of disallowance on premium of Optionally Fully Convertible Premium Notes (OFCPN) is covered in favour of the assessee with the decision of the Tribunal in assessee's own case for the earlier Asstt.Years 2001-02 to 2004-05 dated 20.11.2009 (supra). We being in agreement with the decision of the Co- ordinate Bench of the Tribunal in assessee's own case for the Asstt.Years 2001-02 to 204-05 dated 20.11.2009, decide the issue in favour of the assessee, and the order of the CIT(A) is confirmed and the ground of the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.
5. In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced in Open Court on the date mentioned hereinabove.
Sd/- Sd/- अिनल चतुव'द( / ANIL CHATURVEDI) (अिनल (जी. जी.सी. सी.गु ा/G.C. GUPTA) लेखा सदःय /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER उपा!य" /VICE-PRESIDENT
-2- ITA No.3036/Ahd/2011
Copy of the order forwarded to: 1) : Appellant 2) : Respondent 3) : CIT(A) 4) : CIT concerned 5) : DR, ITAT. BY ORDER
DR/AR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD
-3-
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free