Nimain Charan Biswal vs Sebi
- CitationAppeal No. 204 of 2016
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where an adjudicating order imposes restraints on a party that go beyond the scope of the show cause notice and any interim order against that party, the order cannot be sustained as against that party, and the appropriate course is to quash it and remit the matter to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision on merits in accordance with law.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Date of Decision : 14.07.2016
Appeal No. 204 of 2016 Nimain Charan Biswal C-301/302, Lake Lucerne, Phase-3, Lake Homes, Powai, Mumbai - 400 076. ...Appellant
Versus
Securities and Exchange Board of India, SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G-Block, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400 051. ...Respondent
Dr. Nimain Charan Biswal, Appellant in person.
Mr. Aditya Chitale, Advocate with Mr. Anubhav Ghosh, Advocate i/b The Law Point for the Respondent.
CORAM : Justice J.P. Devadhar, Presiding Officer Jog Singh, Member Dr. C.K.G. Nair, Member
Per : J.P. Devadhar (Oral)
1.
This appeal is filed to challenge the order passed by the Whole Time
Member ('WTM' for short) of Securities and Exchange Board of India
('SEBI' for short) on June 2, 2016. By that order several entities including
the appellant have been restrained from accessing the securities market for a
period of 4 years from the date specified therein. It is not in dispute that in
so far as appellant is concerned the decision of the WTM of SEBI travels
beyond the Show Cause Notice ('SCN' for short) and beyond the interim
order passed against the appellant.
2. Where the impugned order goes beyond the SCN then, that order
cannot be sustained and in such a case, the proper course is to set aside the
said order and restore the matter to the file of WTM of SEBI for passing
fresh order on merits and in accordance with law. 2
3. Accordingly, the impugned order dated June 2, 2016 is quashed qua
the appellant and restored to the file of WTM of SEBI for fresh decision on
merits and in accordance with law.
4. The WTM of SEBI is directed to hear the appellant and pass order
thereon as expeditiously as possible and in any event within a period of two
months from today.
5. Appeal is disposed of in the above terms with no order as to costs.
Sd/-
Justice J.P. Devadhar Presiding Officer
Sd/-
Jog Singh Member
Sd/-
Dr. C.K.G. Nair Member
14.07.2016 Prepared and compared by:
msb
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free