Nikunjwoods Pvt Ltd vs Aakruti Boardlam Private Limited
- CitationComp. App. (AT) (Ins.) No. 829 of 2022
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The reasoning in this order is short, and it rests on one principle: an operational creditor's Section 9 application must independently satisfy the statutory requirements, including the minimum default threshold, and an earlier, dismissed Section 7 application cannot be used to backdate its filing date to a point when the default threshold may have been met.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
M/s. Nikunj Woods (P) Ltd. ....Appellant Vs.
M/s. Aakruti Boardlam (P) Ltd. ...Respondent For Appellant: Mr. Anirudh Gupta, Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocates.
For Respondents: Mr. Mandeep Singh Saluja, Advocate.
ORDER
(Through Virtual Mode)
29.07.2022: Heard Learned Counsel for the Appellant.
2. This Appeal has been filed against the order dated 09.05.2022 passed
by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Ahmedabad,
Division Bench, Court-1, by which order the Adjudicating Authority has
rejected the Application on the ground that it does not fulfil the threshold of
Rupees One Crore although Application was filed on 16.02.2022.
3. Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that he has earlier filed
Section 7 Application which was dismissed for non-prosecution and thereafter
Section 9 Application was filed. Hence, his Section 9 Application be treated to
have been filed on the date he filed Section 7 Application.
4. We are of the view that the prayer of the Appellant to treat his Section 9
Application was filed on the date when he filed Section 7 Application cannot
be accepted. In the Section 9 Application, statutory requirements have to be 2
fulfilled and no error has been committed by the Adjudicating Authority in
rejecting Section 9 Application on the ground that it does not fulfill the
threshold.
[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson
[Justice M. Satyanarayana Murthy] Member (Judicial)
[Barun Mitra] Member (Technical) Anjali/nn
Comp. App. (AT) (Ins.) No. 829 of 2022
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free