Nicco Corporation Ltd vs Technology Develoopment Board
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 360 of 2018
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Supplementary Agreement, which forms part of and is read with the Loan Agreement and the Debt Restructuring Agreement, provides that on the borrower's default in payment of the rescheduled amounts the restructuring arrangement stands cancelled and the borrower is liable to pay the entire amount due under the original Loan Agreement without remission; such a contractual term, read with the restructuring documents, operates to revert the obligation to the original loan. Redeemable preference shares issued under Section 80(1) of the Companies Act, 1956 (now Section 55 of the Companies Act, 2013) are liable to be redeemed at the option of the company, and the redemption and dividend obligations so contracted cannot be treated as a contribution to share capital that bars the holder from claiming as a creditor where the agreed terms on default revert the debt to the original loan. A liquidator cannot contend on behalf of the corporate debtor that the borrower is not liable to pay the entire amount under the Loan Agreement where the borrower has contractually agreed to that liability upon default.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 360 of 2018 (arising out of order dated 6th June, 2018 passed by National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata Bench, in C.P. (IB) No. 312/KB/2018)
IN THE MATTER OF:
Nicco Corporation Ltd. ...Appellant
Versus
Technology Development Board ...Respondent
Present: For Appellant : Mr. Anirudh Wadhwa, Advocate Ms. Nitu Poddar, PCS Mr. Bunny Sehgal, PCS
For Respondent : Mr. B.B. Sawhney, Senior Advocate with Mr. Lakshay Sawhney and Mr. Yogender Singh, Advocates
JUDGMENT
SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J.
The Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Kolkata
Bench passed an order for liquidation of 'Nicco Corporation Ltd.' (Corporate
Debtor). During the liquidation, the respondent - 'Technology Development
Board' ('Board' for short), Government of India, a 'Financial Creditor' filed its
claim, part of which was rejected by the 'Liquidator'. In view of the aforesaid
rejection, the 'Board' filed an appeal before the Adjudicating Authority under
Section 42 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code 2016 (for short, 'the I&B
Code'). The said appeal having allowed by the Adjudicating Authority by the 2
impugned order dated 6th June, 2018 it has been challenged by the
'Liquidator'.
2. The brief facts of the case are as follows.
The 'Board' provided two loans to the 'Corporate Debtor', namely-
(i) Term Loan of Rs. 5.62 Crores under the Loan
Agreement dated 16th December, 1997 for
XLPE Project; and
(ii) Term Loan of Rs. 18.46 Crores under Loan
Agreement dated 28th July, 1999 for
Irradiation Project.
Security /charge were created separately for each of the two Term Loan
Agreements. Deed of Hypothecation dated 12th December, 2000 in respect of
loan amount of Rs. 18.46 Crores was created.
3. The 'Corporate Debtor' defaulted in effecting repayments and
approached the 'Board' for restructuring the debt. By the 'Debt Restructuring
Agreement' dated 24th March, 2004, the debt was restructured whereby, inter
alia, the principal amount of Irradiation Project Loan of Rs. 18.46 Crores was
agreed to be converted to redeemable preference shares as per Clause 4
coupled with firm binding obligation of the 'Corporate Debtor' to redeem the
shares in three instalments on specified fixed future dates by paying the
principal amount and fixed accrued dividend amounts [Clause 4.3].
The accrued unpaid interest relating to the loan of Rs. 18.46 Crores was
agreed to be paid after a moratorium of 2 years in 3 equal instalments [Clause
5.2(a)].
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 360 of 2018 3
4. Clause 3.1(d) of the Debt Restructuring Agreement provides as follows:
"(d) The borrower issuing an undertaking to the
Board that it shall continue to observe and be
bound by obligations in accordance with the
Irradiation Project Loan Agreement and the
XLPE Cable Project Loan Agreement to the
extent that such obligations have not been
modified by the Agreement."
5. The 'Supplementary Agreement' was reached between the parties on
19th January, 2011 whereby dates of redemption of shares and repayments
were deferred/rescheduled. 'Clause 1' of the 'Supplementary Agreement'
reads :
"1. This agreement shall form part of and shall be
attached to and read with the Loan Agreements
dated 16th December 1997 and 28th July 1999,
and the Debt Restructuring Agreement dated
24th March 2004."
6. 'Clause I' of the said 'Supplementary Agreement' reads as follows:
"I. The Borrower has agreed that in case of default
in payment of the loan etc. as rescheduled in
the Supplementary Agreement to the Debt
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 360 of 2018 4
Restructuring Agreement as above, this
agreement shall be treated as cancelled and
the Borrower will be required to pay the entire
amount in terms of the Loan Agreement without
any remission.
The purpose and intent of this provision clearly
is that in case of default by the Company of
terms thereof, not only will the supplementary
agreement relaxing restructuring conditions be
treated as cancelled but the Company will also
become liable to pay the entire amount due in
terms of the Loan Agreement. In other words,
in case of default financial obligations of the
company will revert back to those provided in
the Loan Agreement."
7. In the aforesaid background the respondent made claim and taken plea
that the 'Corporate Debtor' defaulted in effecting repayments as rescheduled
thereby it became liable to pay in terms of the original Loan Agreement dated
28th July, 1999 without any remission. The Board, is a 'Financial Creditor' in
respect of the loan of Rs. 18.46 Crores and interest thereon.
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 360 of 2018 5
8. The stand of the 'Board' that preference shares would stand invalidated
and converted/reverted back to the original loan was not accepted by the
'Liquidator'. According to the learned counsel for the 'Liquidator' the
redemption of 18,46,000 Preference Shares were deferred to 1st April, 2014,
1st April, 2015 and 1st April, 2016. Subsequently, the 'Corporate Debtor'
continued to be in financial distress and consequently the 'corporate
insolvency resolution process' was initiated under the I&B Code.
9. According to the 'Liquidator' a claim of 'Board' was rejected as it is not
a 'creditor' for the amount of Rs. 18.46 crores or alleged interest thereon. In
fact the amount has been redeemed and converted as preferential shares of
18,46,000 with face value of Rs.100/- each. For the first time, during the
'Liquidation', the 'Board' took plea that the shares were redeemable
preferential shares and converted into the loan outstanding against
'Irradiation Project'.
10. Reliance has been placed on the decision of the Hon'ble High Court of
Bombay in 'Aditya Prakash Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. v. Magikwand Media
Pvt. Ltd.' - '2018 SCC OnLine Bom 551' and the decision of the Hon'ble High
Court of Andhra Pradesh in 'Lalchand Surana & Ors. vs. M/s. Hyderabad
Vansaspathy Ltd.' - '1988 SCC OnLine AP 290' to suggest that a preference
shareholder is a contributor to the capital of the company; and is not and
cannot claim to be a 'creditor' even in default on redemption. Further
according to the learned counsel for the 'Liquidator' the amount of Rs. 18.46
Crores converted to and treated to be a part of the shareholder capital cannot
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 360 of 2018 6
be reverted back or treated to be a loan upon the alleged default of
redemption.
We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the
record.
11. 'Debt Restructuring Agreement' dated 24th March, 2004 reached
between the 'Board' and the 'Corporate Debtor' deals with 'preference shares'
and its redemption, which reads as follows:
"4.1 Issue and allotment
No later than 10(ten) days from the date
of receipt by the Borrower of the notice from the
Board referred to in Clause 3 2(b) of this
Agreement, the Borrower shall issue and allot
18,46,000 cumulative convertible preference
shares to the Board ("Preference Shares")
against the Irradiation Project Principal
Amount. The date of such allotment shall
hereinafter be referred to as the "Allotment
Date."
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 360 of 2018 7
4.2 Dividend
No dividend shall be paid on any shares
of the Borrower (whether equity or preference)
unless dividend or the Preference Shares due to
the Board has been paid in full. If no dividend
is paid by the Borrower on the Preference
Shares for any given year then such dividend
shall accrue on the Preference Shares and shall
be paid cumulatively to the Board in such
subsequent year for which dividend is declared
by the Borrower.
4.3 Redemption
Subject to Clause 4.4 of this Agreement
the Preference Shares shall be redeemed by the
Borrower in the following manner:
(a) Series A of the Preference Shares shall be
redeemed by the Borrower on the date
which is the 7th anniversary of the
Allotment Date:
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 360 of 2018 8
(b) Series B of the Preference Shares shall be
redeemed by the Borrower on the date
which is the 8th anniversary of the
Allotment Date: and
(c) Series C of the Preference Shares shall be
redeemed by the Borrower on the date
which is the 9th anniversary of the
Allotment Date.
4.4 Conversion
At any time prior to the redemption of the
Preference Shares or part thereof, the Board
may be written notice to Borrower convert the
Preference Shares or Part thereof into equity
shares of the Borrower at par and on such other
terms as may be considered reasonable by the
Board. No later than 30(thirty) days of receipt
of such notice, the Borrower shall take all such
steps (including obtaining necessary approvals
and consents and undertaking all formalities)
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 360 of 2018 9
as may be necessary to convert the Preference
Shares or part thereof into such equity shares.
12. Clause 5 therein relates to 'Rescheduled Loan & Interest', which is as
follows:
"5. RESCHEDULED LOAN & INTEREST
5.1 XLPE Cable Project Principal Amount
With effect from all the Allotment Date, the
repayment of the XLPE Cable Project Principal
Amount by the Borrower to the Board shall be
subject to a 7(Seven) year moratorium.
5.2 Rescheduled Accrued Interest Amount
With effect from the Allotment Date, the
Rescheduled Accrued Interest Amount shall be
repaid by the Borrowed to the Board after a
2(two) year moratorium in 3(three) years in
equal instalments, as set out in Annex 1. The
"Rescheduled Accrued Interest Amount"
shall be equal to the sum of the following
amounts.
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 360 of 2018 10
(a) the accrued interest (excluding
additional interest of 10% per annum) on
the Irradiation Project Principal Amount
calculated in accordance with the
Irradiation Project Loan Agreement for the
Period up to the Allotment Date, as more
particularly set out in Annex II(a)
("Irradiation Project Interest
Amount"); and
(b) the accrued interest (excluding additional
interest of 10% per annum) on the XLPE
Cable Project Principal Amount calculated
in accordance with the XLPE Cable Project
Loan Agreement for a period up to the
Allotment Date, as more particularly set
out in Annex II(b) (XLPE Cable Project
Interest Amount").
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 360 of 2018 11
5.3 Interest
With effect from the Allotment Date,
the Borrower shall pay to the Board
interest on the XLPE Cable Project
Principal Amount and interest thereon, as
may be outstanding from time to time
calculated with effect from the Allotment
Date at the rate of 5% simple interest per
annum. The Borrower acknowledges and
agrees that the Board shall be entitled in
its sole discretion to revise, upwards or
downwards, the rate of interest from time
to time having regard to its prevailing
policy on interest."
13. In the record of the 'Corporate Debtor' towards 'Irradiation Project Loan'
as on 31st March, 2004, the principal amount and dividend payable on
different dates has been shown as under:
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 360 of 2018 12
'Irradiation Project Loan Rs. In Lakhs
Principal outstanding - 846 (As on 31.03.2004)
Cumulative Dividend from 1.4.2004 to 31.03.2011
Conversion of Irradiation Project Loan in to Preference Shares
Rs. In Lakhs
Sl. Due Dates Principal Dividend Total No. Amount Payable Amount Payable Payable
1. 1st April 2011 (7th Anniversary of 615.00 215.37 830.37 Allotment date)
2. 1st April 2012 (8th Anniversary of 615.00 276.92 891.92 Allotment date)
3. 1st April 2013 (9th Anniversary of 615.00 246.16 862.16 Allotment date) Total 1,846.00 738.45 2,584.55
14. As noticed earlier in the 'Supplementary Agreement on Debt' reached
between the 'Corporate Debtor' and the 'Respondent Board' dated 19th
January, 2011, the Clause (I) shows that the borrower had agreed that in-
case of default in repayment of loan etc. as scheduled in 'Supplementary
Agreement to the Debt Restructuring Agreement' will be treated as cancelled
and the borrower will be required to pay the entire amount in terms of the
'Loan Agreement' without any remission.
15. In 'SJK Steel Plant Limited vs. Meegada Sudhakar Reddy & Ors.'
- 'CP No. 100 of 2007' the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh by judgment
dated 4th December, 2007, while deciding the objection of the Central
Government in respect of conversion of preference shares with accumulated
dividend thereon into FITL and waiver of preference shares on proportionate
basis on repayment of term loan the Hon'ble High Court held that the same
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 360 of 2018 13
is contrary to Section 80(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 1956. The Hon'ble High
Court of Andhra Pradesh held that Section 80 of the Companies Act, 1956
deals with power of the Company which issued redeemable preference shares.
When preference shares are issued, it is not always necessary that they shall
have to be redeemed. Sub-Section (1) of Section 80 of the Companies Act,
1956 clearly provides that "such preference shares are liable to be redeemed",
at the option of the company.
16. In view of the decision of the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh and
reading all the relevant portions of the 'Agreement' particularly the
'Supplementary Agreement' and Section 80(1) of the Companies Act, 1956 (now
Section 55 of the Companies Act, 2013) we hold that the borrower having agreed
that in case of default of repayment of loan etc., the agreement will be treated as
cancelled and the borrower will be required to pay the entire amount in terms of
the loan agreement without any remission. It is not open to the 'Liquidator' to
argue on behalf of the 'Borrower' (Corporate Debtor') that the borrower is not
liable or required to pay the entire amount in terms of the 'Loan Agreement'. We
find no merit in this appeal. It is accordingly dismissed. No cost.
[Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson
[ Justice Bansi Lal Bhat ] Member (Judicial) New Delhi
30th April, 2019.
//ns//
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 360 of 2018
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free