Naveen Bajaj vs Shree Navrang Suppliers Pvt Ltd
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 340 of 2022
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Adjudicating Authority is not in error in admitting an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 where the operational debtor's own letter admits the debt in part and the default is thereby established, notwithstanding that the letter was not relied upon in the application itself. A debtor who wishes to resolve an admitted operational debt through settlement may do so by bringing the settlement before the Adjudicating Authority, which is the body competent to accept any settlement between the parties and pass consequential orders.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
IN THE MATTER OF: Naveen Bajaj ...Appellant
Versus M/s. Shree Navrang Suppliers Pvt. Ltd. ...Respondent
Present: For Appellant: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Mr. Jaspreet Singh Rai, Advocates For Respondent: Mr. Vinod Chaurasia, Advocate for RP ORDER
(Virtual Mode) 01.04.2022: Heard Learned Counsel for the Appellant.
2. This Appeal has been filed against the Order dated 21.02.2022 passed by
the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi, Bench-
V) by which order, the Application being IB No. 227/ND/2019 filed by the
Respondent under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 has
been admitted. The Application was filed by the Respondent-Operational
Creditor under Section 9 of the Code for default of debt of Rs. 24,41,344/- with
interest.
3. The Adjudicating Authority by the impugned Order has admitted the
Application under Section 9 of the Code. The Adjudicating Authority in the
Application has relied on a Letter dated 16th August, 2018 by which the Appellant
has admitted the debt of Rs. 15,76,478/- plus Rs. 97,353/- and returned a 2
finding that debt being admitted, the Application under Section 9 of the Code
deserved to be admitted.
4. Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that he is ready to pay the
admitted amount to the Corporate Debtor and this letter was not referred to in
the Application filed under Section 9 of the Code. Be that as it may, we are of the
view that no error has been committed by the Adjudicating Authority in
admitting the Application under Section 9 of the Code. In event, the Appellant is
desirous to enter into a settlement with the Corporate Debtor, he is at liberty to
enter into a Settlement and bring the Settlement before the Adjudicating
Authority. It is for the Adjudicating Authority to take and pass appropriate order
accepting Settlement, if any, between the parties and pass all consequential
orders. The above submissions are being noted without prejudice to the rights
and contentions of the Appellant.
With these observations, the Appeal is dismissed.
[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson
[Dr. Alok Srivastava] Member (Technical)
[Ms. Shreesha Merla] Member (Technical)
Basant/nn
Company Appeal (AT) Ins. No. 340 of 2022
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free