Nahar Exports Ltd., Ludhiana vs Department Of Income Tax
- CitationITA No.312 /Chd/2011
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
A departmental appeal in which the tax effect is below the monetary limit prescribed by the CBDT instruction is liable to be dismissed as having been filed contrary to that instruction, and a miscellaneous application seeking rectification of such a dismissal will not lie absent a mistake apparent from the record.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
The A.C.I.T., Vs. M/s Nahar Exports Ltd., Circle VII, Ludhiana. Ludhiana. PAN: AAACN5708K (Appellant) (Respondent)
Applicant by : Shri Manjit Singh, DR Respondent by : Shri Navdeep Sharm
Date of hearing : 20.03.2015 Date of Pronouncement : 20.03.2015
O R D E R
Per BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M. :
This Miscellaneous Application is filed by the A.C.I.T.,
Circle-VII, Ludhiana against the order of the Tribunal dated
13.9.2013 in ITA No.139/Chd/2011 for assessment year 2007-
08.
2. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the Revenue
challenged the order of the learned CIT (Appeals) in deleting
the addition of Rs.10,48,390/- out of the addition of
Rs.31.45.172/- on account of disallowance of the expenses.
When the appeal was heard on merit, it was pointed out that
the tax effect in the departmental appeal is less than Rs.3
lacs. Therefore, the departmental appeal is liable to be 2
dismissed as is filed against the CBDT Instruction No.3 dated
9.2.2011. The learned D.R for the Revenue at the time of
hearing of the appeal did not dispute the tax effect in this
appeal is below Rs.3 lacs. The Tribunal considering the facts
of the case in the light of the Board Circular held that the tax
effect in the departmental appeal is less than Rs.3 lacs.
Therefore, the departmental appeal was found to be filed
against the CBDT instruction. The departmental was
accordingly dismissed.
3. After hearing the rival contentions and considering the
averments contained in the Miscellaneous Application, we do
not find any mistake apparent from record in the order of the
Tribunal in dismissing the appeal of the Department. Since
tax effect is less than Rs.3 lacs in the departmental appeal,
therefore, it was rightly dismissed having been filed against
the CBDT instruction and no mistake is pointed out in the
order of the Tribunal.
4 In the result, the Miscellaneous Application filed by the
Revenue is accordingly dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on this 20th day of
March, 2015.
Sd/- Sd/- (T.R.SOOD) (BHAVNESH SAINI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER
Dated : 20 t h March, 2015
*Rati*
Copy to: The Appellant/The Respondent/The CIT(A)/The CIT/The DR. 3
Assistant Registrar, ITAT, Chandigarh
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free