N. Lingusamy vs Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. & Anr
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 412 of 2018
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The absence of movable or immovable property in the corporate debtor is not a ground for setting aside an order admitting an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016; such matters fall to be determined at the resolution stage by the Committee of Creditors and the Adjudicating Authority, failing which the process may proceed to liquidation.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
N. Lingusamy ...Appellant
Vs
Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. & Anr. ....Respondents
Present: For Appellant: Mr. A, Venkata Subramanian and Mr. A. Leo George Rozario, Advocates. For Respondents: Mr. Brajesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate for R-1.
ORDER
10.12.2018: Admittedly, pursuant to an agreement, a consolidated sum of
Rs.1 Crore was paid to the Corporate Debtor and inspite of repeated notices the
Corporate Debtor failed to pay the amount with interest. For the said reason the
application under Section 7 was preferred by 'M/s Shriram City Union Finance
Ltd.' against 'M/s Thirrupathi Brothers Film Media Private Limited' (Corporate
Debtor) which has been admitted.
2. Initially, learned counsel for the Appellant sought time to settle the claim
with the Financial Creditor but having failed, we intend to hear the case on merit.
3. Learned counsel for the Appellant submitted that the Corporate Debtor
has no movable or immovable property and as such the Financial Creditor will
not gain anything, if Section 7 application is admitted. However, such ground
cannot be noticed for setting aside the order of admission as these are the issues -2-
which can be determined at the stage of resolution by the Committee of Creditors
and the Adjudicating Authority and on failure they may proceed with liquidation.
3. We find no merit in this appeal. It is accordingly dismissed. No costs.
[Justice S. J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson
[Justice Bansi Lal Bhat] Member (Judicial)
am/uk
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 412 of 2018
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free