Ms. Usha Murugavel vs Sebi
- CitationAppeal No. 1012 of 2022
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where summonses and notices sent to a party's address are returned undelivered, with an endorsement that the addressee has left, service by affixation at that same address is not proper service in law. An adjudicating order passed without service of the show cause notice, or without any opportunity of hearing to the party, is liable to be set aside on that ground alone and the matter remitted for a fresh decision after due service.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Date of Decision : 11.01.2023
Appeal No. 1012 of 2022
Ms. Usha Murugavel Proprietor of Aswin Logistic Ventures 6, Patel Street, Ananda Nagar, Tambaram East, Chennai - 600 059. .....Appellant
Versus
Securities and Exchange Board of India SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G-Block, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400 051. ...Respondent
Ms. Amrita Jain, Advocate i/b Singhania & Co. LLP for the Appellant.
Mr. Sumit Rai, Advocate with Ms. Karishma Molta and Mr. Aditya Sarangarajan, Advocates i/b Mansukhlal Hiralal & Co. for the Respondent.
CORAM : Justice Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer Ms. Meera Swarup, Technical Member
Per : Justice Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer (Oral)
1.
We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. The
appellant has challenged the order dated May 31, 2022 passed
by the Adjudicating Officer ('AO' for short) of the Securities
and Exchange Board of India ('SEBI' for short). The ground 2
urged is, that it is an ex parte order. The show cause notice or
supplementary show cause notice or date of hearing was
never served upon the appellant.
2. In the reply filed by the respondent, we find that the
summons sent at the address of the appellant came back
undelivered. In one of the notices that was sent subsequently
there was an endorsement that the addressee had left. In view
of this evidence, service by way of affixation at the same
address is not proper service in the eyes of law.
3. Consequently, we are of the affirmed view that
appellant was not served nor any opportunity was provided to
the appellant. On this short ground, the impugned order is set
aside. The appeal is allowed. The matter is remitted to the AO
to pass a fresh order in accordance with law after serving the
show cause notice. In this regard the appellant shall appear
before the AO on January 23, 2023 on which date the show
cause notice would be served and the matter will proceed
from there onwards.
4. This order will be digitally signed by the Private
Secretary on behalf of the bench and all concerned parties are
directed to act on the digitally signed copy of this order. 3
Certified copy of this order is also available from the Registry
on payment of usual charges.
Justice Tarun Agarwala Presiding Officer
Ms. Meera Swarup Technical Member
11.01.2023 MADHUKAR Digitally signed by MADHUKAR SHAMRAO SHAMRAO BHALBAR msb BHALBAR Date: 2023.01.12 14:54:27 +05'30'
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free