Ms. Poorani Nagarajan, (Shareholder In ... vs Indian Bank & Ors
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 318 of 2017
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Adjudicating Authority may admit an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 where the Financial Creditor shows that a debt is due from the Corporate Debtor, that the Corporate Debtor has committed a default, and that the application record is complete. A correspondence between the Financial Creditor and the Corporate Debtor, such as a letter inviting discussion on a recovery action plan, issued after the Adjudicating Authority has heard the parties but before its admission order, does not render that admission order illegal.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Ms. Poorani Nagarajan, (Shareholder in M/s. Infinitas Energy Solutions Pvt. Ltd. ...Appellant
Versus
Indian Bank & Ors. ...Respondents
Present:
For Appellant : Shri Karthick Ranganathan, Shri T. S. Sundaram and Shri R. Vishnu Kumar, Advocates
ORDER
18.12.2017 By the impugned order dated 18th September, 2017, the
Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Chennai admitted the
application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
(hereinafter referred to as the "I&B Code") having noticed that there is a debt and
default and documents filed by the respondent - Indian Bank (Financial Creditor)
is complete.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant challenging the
impugned order submitted that the Joint Lenders Forum, in their meeting had
already decided to revive the Corporate Debtor and, therefore, it cannot be
treated to be a default on the part of the appellant. He placed reliance on a
notice dated 14th September, 2017 issued by the Financial Creditor, just before
the admission of the application asking the appellant to discuss its action plan
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 318 of 2017 1 for recovery of the bank dues. However, we find that letter was issued by the
Financial Creditor, after notice and hearing the parties by the Adjudicating
Authority but before passing of the impugned order dated 15th September, 2017.
According to us the correspondence aforesaid will not render the impugned order
illegal.
Admittedly, there being a debt due from the appellant and the appellant
having committed default and record being complete, no ground made out to
interfere with the impugned order. In absence of any merit, the appeal is
dismissed. No cost.
[Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson
[ Justice Bansi Lal Bhat ] Member (Judicial)
/ns/uk
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 318 of 2017 2
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free