Mrs. Nandhitha Vedam vs M/S. Udhyaman Investments Pvt. Ltd. & ...
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 166 of 2018
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The existence of a dispute between the corporate debtor and the financial creditor, including a reference of that dispute to arbitration, is not a ground for opposing an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016; such a ground may be raised only against an application under Section 9. Where a financial creditor's Section 7 application is complete and the record shows a debt and a default in its payment, the Adjudicating Authority is bound to admit the application.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Mrs. Nandhitha Vedam ...Appellant
Vs.
M/s. Udhyaman Investments Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. ...Respondents
Present: For Appellant: - Mr. Mohan Parasaran, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. K.V. Jagdishvaran and Mr. G. Indira, Advocates.
For Respondents:- Mr. E. Om Prakash, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. M. Anbalagan, Ms. Madhusmita Bora, Advocates. Mr. R. Bharat Kumar and Mr. B. Karuna, Advocates. Mr. Moorthy, Advocate for R-2.
ORDER
31.07.2018─ The Appellant- Shareholder has challenged the order
dated 12th March, 2018 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National
Company Law Tribunal), Single Bench, Chennai, admitting the
application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
(hereinafter referred to as "I&B Code') filed by the Respondents for
initiation of 'Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process' of 'M/s. Tiffins
Barytes Asbestos and Paints Limited'- ('Corporate Debtor').
2. Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant
submitted that there was an existence of dispute between the 'Corporate
Contd/-.............
-2-
Debtor' and the 'Financial Creditor' and the matter was referred for
Arbitration. But no such ground can be taken for opposing an application
under Section 7, though such ground can be taken if application would
have been preferred under Section 9 of the 'I&B Code'.
3. In the present case, as we find that there is a debt and the
'Corporate Debtor' defaulted in payment of debt to the 'Financial
Creditor'. The application being complete, we hold that the Adjudicating
Authority rightly admitted the application. We find no ground to interfere
with the impugned order dated 12th March, 2018. The appeal is
accordingly dismissed. No cost.
(Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya) Chairperson
(Justice Bansi Lal Bhat) Member(Judicial) Ar/uk
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 166 of 2018
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free