Mrs. Anila Jalan vs Sebi
- CitationReview Application No. 23 of 2022
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Tribunal's dismissal of the review applications rests on the principle that a review lies only for a manifest error apparent on the face of the record; where the applicant shows no such error, the application must be dismissed, and the Tribunal will not reconsider its earlier order on the merits.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Date of Decision : 06.02.2023
Review Application No. 23 of 2022 In Appeal No. 389 of 2022
Mrs. Rinku Jalan Active Acres, Flat No. 13E, Tower 6B, 54/10 D.C. Dey Road, ..... Applicant / Kolkata - 700 015. Orig. Appellant
Versus
Securities and Exchange Board of India SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G-Block, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400 051. ... Respondent
Mr. Rohit Gupta, Advocate with Mr. Hara Kar and S. Naik, Advocates i/b Interjuris for the Applicant / Orig. Appellant.
Mr. Shefali Shankar, Advocate with Mr. Ravishekhar Pandey, Mr. Nishit Dhruva and Mr. Rasika Ghate, Advocates i/b. MDP & Partners for Respondent.
WITH Review Application No. 24 of 2022 In Appeal No. 390 of 2022
Mrs. Anila Jalan Flat No. 102, E 1, Harrington Court, #99 Harrington Road, ..... Applicant / Chetput, Chennai. Org. Appellant
Versus 2
Securities and Exchange Board of India SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G-Block, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400 051. ... Respondent
Mr. Rohit Gupta, Advocate with Mr. Hara Kar and S. Naik, Advocates i/b Interjuris for the Applicant / Orig. Appellant.
Mr. Shefali Shankar, Advocate with Mr. Ravishekhar Pandey, Mr. Nishit Dhruva and Mr. Rasika Ghate, Advocates i/b. MDP & Partners for Respondent.
AND Review Application No. 25 of 2022 In Appeal No. 391 of 2022
Sanjay Jalan Flat No. 102, "Avatara". Wheat Croft Road, Nungambakkam, ..... Applicant / Chennai - 600 034. Orig. Appellant
Versus
Securities and Exchange Board of India SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G-Block, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400 051. ... Respondent
Mr. Rohit Gupta, Advocate with Mr. Hara Kar and S. Naik, Advocates i/b Interjuris for the Applicant / Orig. Appellant.
Mr. Shefali Shankar, Advocate with Mr. Ravishekhar Pandey, Mr. Nishit Dhruva and Mr. Rasika Ghate, Advocates i/b. MDP & Partners for Respondent. 3
CORAM : Justice Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer Ms. Meera Swarup, Technical Member
Per : Justice Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer (Oral)
1.
Having heard the learned counsel for the applicant we
do not find any manifest error requiring reconsideration of our
order dated July 19, 2022. The Review Applications fail and
are dismissed.
2. This order will be digitally signed by the Private
Secretary on behalf of the bench and all concerned parties are
directed to act on the digitally signed copy of this order.
Certified copy of this order is also available from the Registry
on payment of usual charges.
Justice Tarun Agarwala Presiding Officer
Ms. Meera Swarup Technical Member 06.02.2023 MADHUKAR Digitally signed by MADHUKAR SHAMRAO SHAMRAO BHALBAR
msb BHALBAR Date: 2023.02.07 11:40:30 +05'30'
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free