Mr. Vasant Bissa vs Sebi
- CitationAppeal No.29 of 2021
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Tribunal has regard to the SEBI circular dated 1st July, 2020, and holds that where the broker has itself voluntarily disabled its trading terminal, such voluntary disablement falls within para 7 of that circular, so that the stock exchange is not obliged to refer the investor's complaint to the Investor Grievance Redressal Committee.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Order Reserved on: 18.1.2021 Date of Decision:21.1.2021
Misc. Application No.584 of 2020 And Appeal No.29 of 2021
Mr. Vasant Bissa 3rd Floor, Latiyal Bhavan, Pandit Solicitor Road, Malad (E), Mumbai - 400097. ...Appellant
Versus
1.
National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. Exchange Plaza, C-1, Block G, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra East, Mumbai - 400051.
2. Action Financial Services (India) Ltd. 11 to 15, Rajgir Chambers, 6th Floor, 12/14 Shahid Bhagat Singh Road, Fort, Mumbai-400001.
3. Yes Bank Ltd., Yes Bank Tower, ONE International Center, Tower II 15th Floor, Senapati Bapat Marg, Elphinstone (W), Mumbai, MH 400013, IN
4. Securities and Exchange Board of India SEBI Bhavan, C-4A, G-Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (E), Mumbai - 400 051. ...Respondents 2
Ms. Rinku Valanju, Advocate with Mr. Pratham Masurekar and Mr. Aditya Shah, Advocates i/b. Pratham Masurekar for the Appellant.
Mr. Vishal Kanade, Advocate with Mr. Sachin Chandarana, Mr. Rashid Boatwalla and Mr. Pruthvi Dhinoja, Advocates i/b. Manilal Kher Ambalal & Co. for the Respondent no.1.
Mr. Anubhav Ghosh, Advocate with Mr. Ravishekhar Pandey, Advocate i/b. The Law Point for the Respondent no.4.
CORAM: Justice Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer Dr. C.K.G. Nair, Member Justice M.T. Joshi, Judicial Member
Per : Justice Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer
1. The appellant is aggrieved by the communication
dated 6th November, 2020 issued by the respondent
no.1 National Stock Exchange of India Ltd.
(hereinafter referred to as 'NSE') intimating its
inability to refer the complaint to Investor Grievance
Redressal Committee (IGRC) in view of the circular
dated 1st July, 2020 issued by Securities and Exchange
Board of India (hereinafter referred to as 'SEBI').
2. The facts leading to the filing of the appeal is that a
dispute arose between the appellant and its broker
since the dues were not settled. A complaint was made 3
by the appellant on 30th September, 2020 directing the
stock exchange to refer the complaint to IGRC. This
was not done by the impugned communication and
consequently the present appeal.
3. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, we
are of the opinion that the controversy involved in the
present appeal is squarely covered by a decision of this
Tribunal dated 19th January, 2021 in appeal no.288 of
2020 Rakesh Bhatia and Ors. vs. National Stock
Exchange of India Ltd.& Ors. and other connected
appeals.
4. We are further of the opinion that in the instant case
the broker had voluntarily disabled its trading terminal
on 18th September, 2020. Such voluntary disablement
is covered under para 7 of the circular dated 1st July,
2020.
5. In the light of the aforesaid, the relief sought by the
appellant cannot be granted. The appeal is disposed of
with a direction that it is open to the appellant to file a
claim petition under the bye-laws of the stock 4
exchange. Misc. Application no.584 of 2020 is also
disposed of accordingly. In the circumstances of the
case there shall be no order as to costs.
6. The present matter was heard through video
conference due to Covid-19 pandemic. At this stage it
is not possible to sign a copy of this order nor a
certified copy of this order could be issued by the
registry. In these circumstances, this order will be
digitally signed by the Private Secretary on behalf of
the bench and all concerned parties are directed to act
on the digitally signed copy of this order. Parties will
act on production of a digitally signed copy sent by fax
and/or email.
Justice Tarun Agarwala RAJALAKS Digitally signed by RAJALAKSHMI Presiding Officer HMI H H NAIR Date: 2021.01.24 NAIR 19:59:03 +05'30' Dr. C.K.G. Nair Member
Justice M.T. Joshi Judicial Member
21.1.2021 RHN
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free