Mr. Suraj Govind Prajapati vs Sebi
- CitationAppeal No. 422 of 2023
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Tribunal disposed of the appeals by conditioning the defreezing of the appellants' demat and bank accounts on deposit of their share of the unlawful gain, with all other interim directions to continue operating; the appellants were left free to seek vacation of the interim order before the Whole Time Member, who must then decide any such application after hearing the parties within four weeks.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Date of Decision : 04.05.2023
Misc. Application No. 550 of 2023 And Appeal No. 422 of 2023
Mr. Suraj Govind Prajapati A 3, Divya Jyot Flats, Behind Alkapuri Society, Sumul Diary Road, Katargram, Surat, Gujarat - 395004. ..... Appellant
Versus
Securities and Exchange Board of India SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400 051. ... Respondent
With Misc. Application No. 572 of 2023 And Misc. Application No. 573 of 2023 And Appeal No. 423 of 2023
Mr. Priyank Prajapati C-4, Subhashbridge, Satlaj Society, Ahmedabad - 380027, Gujarat. ..... Appellant
Versus
Securities and Exchange Board of India SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400 051. ... Respondent 2
Mr. Rushin Kapadia, Advocate with Ms. Rinku Valanju, Advocate i/b R. V. Legal for the Appellants.
CORAM : Justice Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer Ms. Meera Swarup, Technical Member
Per : Justice Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer (Oral)
1.
We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. Both the
appeals are against a common order and are being taken up together.
2. The appellants have challenged the order dated January 31,
2023 passed by the Whole Time Member (hereinafter referred to as
'WTM') of Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter
referred to as 'SEBI') which is an interim order cum show cause
notice whereby the appellants have been restrained from accessing
the securities market and have further been directed to deposit the
unlawful gains jointly and severally. In addition to the above, other
directions have been also issued like freezing of bank accounts and
demat accounts, etc.
3. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, we find that
the appellants had moved an application to deposit their share of the
unlawful gain as depicted in table No. 21 of the impugned order.
This application has remained pending and instead of deciding the 3
matter, the respondent have issued e-mails asking the appellants to
comply with the other directions first.
4. Considering the aforesaid, we dispose of the appeals directing
that in the event the appellants deposit the unlawful gain as depicted
against their names in table No. 21 of the impugned order, the demat
accounts and bank accounts shall be defreezed within 48 hrs. upon
the deposits. All other interim directions would continue to operate
and it would be open to the appellants to move an appropriate
application for vacation of the interim order before the WTM. If
such an application is filed, the WTM will pass an appropriate order
after giving an opportunity of hearing within four weeks thereafter.
5. The appeals are disposed of.
6. This order will be digitally signed by the Private Secretary on
behalf of the bench and all concerned parties are directed to act on
the digitally signed copy of this order. Certified copy of this order is
also available from the Registry on payment of usual charges.
Justice Tarun Agarwala Presiding Officer
Ms. Meera Swarup Technical Member PRAMILA Digitally signed by PRAMILA TANAJI 04.05.2023 TANAJI MISAL PTM MISAL Date: 2023.05.04 14:20:00 +05'30'
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free