Mr. Sidhartha Kumar Barik vs Sebi
- CitationAppeal No. 381 of 2018
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Tribunal will not interfere with a penalty imposed by an Adjudicating Officer for non-compliance with a directions order under Sections 11 and 11B of the SEBI Act, where that directions order has attained finality following dismissal of the appeal against it, and the directions remain unobeyed.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Date of Decision : 07.11.2019
Appeal No. 381 of 2018
Mr. Sidhartha Kumar Barik At Gobindpur, P. O. Kesharipur, Via-Soro, Balasore - 756045. .....Appellant
Versus
1.
Securities and Exchange Board of India SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400 051.
2. Real Vision International Ltd. Plot No.- N-6/432, 2nd Floor, In front of Allahabad Bank, IRC Village, Nayapalli, Bhubaneswar - 751015.
3. Mr. Sudhir Kumar Behera At : Daulatabad, G. P. Choudwar Municipality, P. C. Choudwar, Cuttack - 754025.
4. Mr. Ashok Pattnaik Plot No. 432, Prachi Vihar, Palasuni, Rasulgarh, Bhuvaneshwar - 751010.
5. Bidesi Behera At. Girisola, Po. Kirapalli, Ps. Bhanjanagar, Ganjam - 761119.
6. Devi Prasad Mohanty Hakim Pada, Angul N.A.C. Angul - 759143.
7. Rashmi Ranjan Mohanty Nuahata, Banarpal, Angul - 759128.
2 8. Prasanna Kumar Nayak Patpur, Via - Bahugram, Ps. Salepur, Cuttack
9. Sukanta Biswal At. Chakeisiani, Po. Rasulgarh, PS. Mancheswar, Bhuvaneshwar, Khurda, Pin - 751010.
10. Pabitra Kumar Rath Paik Baghna Bereni - 2, Po. Khamar Sahi, Via - Sattapatna, Ps. Daspalla, Nayagarh. ... Respondents
Mr. Balaram Mohanty, Advocate i/b Mohanty & Associates for the Appellant.
Mr. Chirag Bhavsar, Advocate with Ms. Eram Quraishi, Advocate i/b MDP & Partners for the Respondent.
CORAM : Justice Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer Dr. C. K. G. Nair, Member Justice M. T. Joshi, Judicial Member
Per : Justice Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer (Oral)
1. The Whole Time Member (hereinafter referred to as, 'WTM')
of Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred to as,
'SEBI') passed an order dated December 10, 2015 issuing various
directions under Section 11 and 11B of the Securities and Exchange
Board of India Act, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as, 'SEBI Act') to
the company and its directors to refund the amount alongwith interest
to the investors. This order of the WTM was challenged by the
appellant which was dismissed by this Tribunal by an order dated 3
August 17, 2018 in Appeal No. 259 of 2018. The said order was
challenged by the appellant before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of
India which has also been dismissed.
2. The present appeal has filed against the order of the
Adjudicating Officer (hereinafter referred to as, 'AO') whereby the
penalty of Rs. 25 lacs has been imposed for non compliance of the
order passed by the WTM.
3. Admittedly, the order of the WTM has not been complied till
date even though more than four years have elapsed. The said order
has also attained finality since the appeal against the said order was
also dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India.
4. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, we do not find
any manifest error in the order of the AO imposing the penalty for
non compliance. The Appeal is dismissed.
Sd/-
Justice Tarun Agarwala Presiding Officer
Sd/-
Dr. C. K. G. Nair Member
Sd/-
Justice M. T. Joshi Judicial Member 07.11.2019 Prepared & Compared by PTM
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free