Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Mr. Sidhartha Kumar Barik vs Sebi

Securities Appellate Tribunal7 November 2019Tarun Agarwala

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The Tribunal will not interfere with a penalty imposed by an Adjudicating Officer for non-compliance with a directions order under Sections 11 and 11B of the SEBI Act, where that directions order has attained finality following dismissal of the appeal against it, and the directions remain unobeyed.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNALMUMBAI

Date of Decision : 07.11.2019

Appeal No. 381 of 2018

Mr. Sidhartha Kumar Barik At Gobindpur, P. O. Kesharipur, Via-Soro, Balasore - 756045. .....Appellant

Versus

1.

Securities and Exchange Board of India SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400 051.

2. Real Vision International Ltd. Plot No.- N-6/432, 2nd Floor, In front of Allahabad Bank, IRC Village, Nayapalli, Bhubaneswar - 751015.

3. Mr. Sudhir Kumar Behera At : Daulatabad, G. P. Choudwar Municipality, P. C. Choudwar, Cuttack - 754025.

4. Mr. Ashok Pattnaik Plot No. 432, Prachi Vihar, Palasuni, Rasulgarh, Bhuvaneshwar - 751010.

5. Bidesi Behera At. Girisola, Po. Kirapalli, Ps. Bhanjanagar, Ganjam - 761119.

6. Devi Prasad Mohanty Hakim Pada, Angul N.A.C. Angul - 759143.

7. Rashmi Ranjan Mohanty Nuahata, Banarpal, Angul - 759128.

2 8. Prasanna Kumar Nayak Patpur, Via - Bahugram, Ps. Salepur, Cuttack

9. Sukanta Biswal At. Chakeisiani, Po. Rasulgarh, PS. Mancheswar, Bhuvaneshwar, Khurda, Pin - 751010.

10. Pabitra Kumar Rath Paik Baghna Bereni - 2, Po. Khamar Sahi, Via - Sattapatna, Ps. Daspalla, Nayagarh. ... Respondents

Mr. Balaram Mohanty, Advocate i/b Mohanty & Associates for the Appellant.

Mr. Chirag Bhavsar, Advocate with Ms. Eram Quraishi, Advocate i/b MDP & Partners for the Respondent.

CORAM : Justice Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer Dr. C. K. G. Nair, Member Justice M. T. Joshi, Judicial Member

Per : Justice Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer (Oral)

1. The Whole Time Member (hereinafter referred to as, 'WTM')

of Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred to as,

'SEBI') passed an order dated December 10, 2015 issuing various

directions under Section 11 and 11B of the Securities and Exchange

Board of India Act, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as, 'SEBI Act') to

the company and its directors to refund the amount alongwith interest

to the investors. This order of the WTM was challenged by the

appellant which was dismissed by this Tribunal by an order dated 3

August 17, 2018 in Appeal No. 259 of 2018. The said order was

challenged by the appellant before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of

India which has also been dismissed.

2. The present appeal has filed against the order of the

Adjudicating Officer (hereinafter referred to as, 'AO') whereby the

penalty of Rs. 25 lacs has been imposed for non compliance of the

order passed by the WTM.

3. Admittedly, the order of the WTM has not been complied till

date even though more than four years have elapsed. The said order

has also attained finality since the appeal against the said order was

also dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India.

4. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, we do not find

any manifest error in the order of the AO imposing the penalty for

non compliance. The Appeal is dismissed.

Sd/-

Justice Tarun Agarwala Presiding Officer

Sd/-

Dr. C. K. G. Nair Member

Sd/-

Justice M. T. Joshi Judicial Member 07.11.2019 Prepared & Compared by PTM

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free