Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Mr. Sarthak Vijlani vs Sebi

Securities Appellate Tribunal31 May 2019

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The impugned order, passed without effective service of the show cause notice on the appellant, is set aside as against him and the matter is remitted to the adjudicating authority for a fresh hearing, so that the appellant may file a reply and be heard in accordance with law.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI DATE : 31.05.2019

Appeal No. 187 of 2019 Mr. Sarthak Vijlani A-423, Bonanza, Sahar Plaza Complex, J. B. Nagar, Andheri (East), Mumbai - 400 059. ....Appellant

Versus

Securities and Exchange Board of India SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400 051. ... Respondent

Mr. Prakash Shah, Advocate with Mr. Chinmay Paradkar, Advocate i/b Prakash Shah & Associates for the Appellant. Mr. Akshay Patil, Advocate with Mr. Mihir Mody, Mr. Sushant Yadav, Mr. Tabish Mooman, Advocates i/b K. Ashar & Co. for the Respondent.

CORAM : Dr. C. K. G. Nair, Member Justice M. T. Joshi, Judicial Member

Per : Justice M. T. Joshi, Judicial Member (Oral)

1.

Heard both sides. The learned counsel for the respondent

SEBI on instruction submitted that the contention of the appellant

that there was no service of notice cannot be accepted. However,

without prejudice to the contention of the SEBI that there was service

of notice by affixing the same on the outer door of the last known 2

residential address of the appellant, the case can be remitted back to

the respondent SEBI for fresh hearing in the matter.

2. In these circumstances, the appeal is disposed of without any

order as to costs. The impugned order is quashed and set aside qua

the appellant i.e Noticee No. 15. The Whole Time Member

(hereinafter referred to as, 'WTM') is directed to grant an

opportunity to the Noticee No. 15 to file a reply to the show cause

notice and to deal with the matter in accordance with law. The

appellant is directed to appear before the WTM on July 9, 2019.

Sd/-

Dr. C. K. G. Nair Member

Sd/-

Justice M. T. Joshi Judicial Member 31.05.2019 Prepared & Compared by PTM

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free