Mr. K. Murugavel vs Sebi
- CitationAppeal No.61 of 2023
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The principle that an adjudicating order imposing a monetary penalty cannot stand where the affected party was not afforded an opportunity of hearing, the notice having been returned undelivered, and that where the party's continued residence at the address is shown, the matter must be remitted to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision after affording a hearing in accordance with law.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Mr. K. Murugavel 6, Patel Street, Ananda Nagar, Tambaram East, Chennai-600059. ...Appellant
Versus
Securities and Exchange Board of India SEBI Bhavan, Plot No.C-4A, G Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400 051. ...Respondent
Ms. Amrita Jain, Advocate for the Appellant.
Mr. Sumit Rai, Advocate with Mr. Aditya Sarangarajan, Advocate i/b. Mansukhlal Hiralal & Co. for the Respondent.
CORAM: Justice Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer Ms. Meera Swarup, Technical Member
Per: Justice Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer (Oral) 2
1.
The present appeal has been filed against the order
dated 31st May, 2022 whereby a penalty of Rs.10 lakhs
has been imposed upon the appellant. There is a delay
in the filing of the appeal. For the reasons stated in the
application, the delay is condoned. The application is
allowed.
2. We find that no opportunity of hearing was
provided to the appellant. As per the impugned order
notice returned undelivered with a remark 'left'
without instructions.
3. The learned counsel for the appellant states that the
appellant has not left the residential premises and is
still residing at the same address. In view of the
aforesaid, we are of the confirmed opinion that a
proper opportunity of hearing was not provided to the
appellant. We therefore set aside the impugned order
insofar as the appellant is concerned. The appeal is
allowed. The matter is remitted to the Adjudicating
Officer to decide the matter afresh in accordance with 3
law after giving an opportunity of hearing to the
appellant.
4. In this regard, the appellant shall appear before the
Adjudicating Officer on 1st February, 2023 on which
date the matter will be proceed in accordance with law.
5. This order will be digitally signed by the Private
Secretary on behalf of the bench and all concerned
parties are directed to act on the digitally signed copy
of this order. Certified copy of this order is also
available from the Registry on payment of usual
charges.
Justice Tarun Agarwala Presiding Officer
Ms. Meera Swarup Technical Member
RAJALAK Digitally signed by SHMI RAJALAKSHMI HARISH HARISH NAIR 18.1.2023 NAIR Date: 2023.01.20 10:11:45 +05'30'
RHN
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free