Mr. Gaurav Gupta vs Sebi
- CitationAppeal No.430 of 2016
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The appeals are disposed of by remitting the matter to the regulator without examining the merits, because the appellants' challenge to the confirmatory order is belated and the appeals are inordinately delayed; the Tribunal directs SEBI to reconsider the case and pass a fresh order after affording the appellants a personal hearing.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Date of Decision : 31.1.2017
Misc. Application No.358 of 2016 And Appeal No.430 of 2016
Mr. Rajiv Bajaj QD-26, Pitampura, Delhi-110034. ..... Appellant
Versus
Securities and Exchange Board of India, SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G-Block, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400 051. ...... Respondent
With Misc. Application No.365 of 2016 And Appeal No.435 of 2016 Mr. Anuj Nagpal, M-134, Greater Kailash - I, New Delhi-110048. ..... Appellant
Versus
Securities and Exchange Board of India, SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G-Block, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400 051. ...... Respondent
With Misc. Application No.366 of 2016 And Appeal No.436 of 2016 Ms. Anu Nagpal, M-134, Greater Kailash - I, New Delhi-110048. ..... Appellant
Versus
Securities and Exchange Board of India, SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G-Block, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400 051. ...... Respondent 2
With Misc. Application No.369 of 2016 And Appeal No.439 of 2016 Mr. Abheek Nagpal, M - 134, Greater Kailash - I, New Delhi-110048. ..... Appellant
Versus
Securities and Exchange Board of India, SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G-Block, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400 051. ...... Respondent
With Misc. Application No.370 of 2016 And Appeal No.440 of 2016 Mr. Prateek Nagpal, M - 134, Greater Kailash - I, New Delhi-110048. ..... Appellant
Versus
Securities and Exchange Board of India, SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G-Block, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400 051. ...... Respondent
Mr. Prakash Shah, Advocate with Mr. Robin Shah, Advocate for the Appellant.
Mr. S.P. Bharti, Advocate with Mr. Pulkit Sukhramani, Advocate i/b. The Law Point for the Respondent.
With Misc. Application No.375 of 2016 And Appeal No.457 of 2016 Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Flat No.B-809, Prateek Sedora, Plot No.E-11, Sec-61, ..... Appellant Noida, Uttar Pradesh - 201307.
Versus
Securities and Exchange Board of India, SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G-Block, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400 051. ...... Respondent 3
With Misc. Application No.376 of 2016 And Appeal No.458 of 2016 Mr. Sunil Kumar, C- 29, Sector - 61, Noida, Uttar Pradesh - 201301. ..... Appellant
Versus
Securities and Exchange Board of India, SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G-Block, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400 051. ...... Respondent
With Misc. Application No.377 of 2016 And Appeal No.459 of 2016 Ms. Vinita Kumari, SB-93, Shastri Nagar, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh - 201001. ..... Appellant
Versus
Securities and Exchange Board of India, SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G-Block, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400 051. ...... Respondent
Mr. Prakash Shah, Advocate with Mr. Robin Shah, Advocate for the Appellant.
Mr. Vishal Kanade, Advocate with Mr. Pulkit Sukhramani, Advocate i/b. The Law Point for the Respondent.
CORAM : Justice J.P. Devadhar, Presiding Officer Dr. C.K.G. Nair, Member
Per : Justice J.P. Devadhar (Oral)
1.
In all these appeals, the appellants have challenged the confirmatory order
passed by the Whole Time Member of the Securities and Exchange Board of India
('SEBI' for short) on February 17, 2016 with Miscellaneous Application seeking
condonation of the delay. By the said confirmatory order, the directions contained in 4
the ex-parte ad-interim order dated June 29, 2015 have been confirmed solely on the
ground that the appellants have failed to file their objections.
2. In view of the fact that there is inordinate delay in filing these appeals and in
view of the fact that the appellants though belatedly are objecting to the continuation
of the ex-parte ad-interim order, without going into the merits of the case, we dispose
of these appeals by directing SEBI to consider the case of the appellant and pass an
order after affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the appellants.
3. All the appeals as also the Miscellaneous Applications are disposed of
accordingly with no order as to costs.
Sd/-
Justice J. P. Devadhar Presiding Officer
Sd/-
Dr. C.K.G.Nair Member
31.1.2017 Prepared and compared by RHN
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free