Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Mr. Dinesh Kapur vs M/S Recorders & Medicare Systems Pvt. ...

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal11 December 2017

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

Once a corporate insolvency resolution process has been initiated and a moratorium imposed under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, a former employee holding a decree against the corporate debtor cannot pursue an appeal to enforce that decree in the ordinary course; the appeal against an order arising from such a decree is therefore not maintainable, and the enforcement of the decree must be sought by the means the Code provides.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHICompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.310 of 2017IN THE MATTER OF:1. Mr. Dinesh Kapur,Flat No.615, 1st Floor, Gracia Floor,GBM Apartments, Kharar Kurali HighwaysKharar, Dist - Mohali (Punjab) 140301.2. Mr. Sukhwinder Singh Saini,H. No. 452, Shivalik Vihar, Patiala Road,Zirakpur, Dist. Mohali, Punjab -140603.

3. Mr. Kiran Anand, House No. 83, Friends Colony, GT Road, Khanna, Dist. Ludhiana (Punjab)-141401. ...Appellants

Vs

1. M/s Recorders & Medicare Systems Pvt. Ltd., Plot No.196, Industrial Area, Phase-I Panchkula - 134113 (Haryana)

2. Mr. Anil Goel, Resolution Professional, M/s Recorders & Medicare Systems Pvt. Ltd., Plot No.196, Industrial Area, Phase-I Panchkula - 134113 (Haryana) ...Respondents

Present: For Appellants: Mr. Ashwarya Sinha, Mr. Girik Bhalla, Advocates. For Respondents: None.

ORDER

11.12.2017: The Appellants are aggrieved of the order dated 12th October, 2017 passed by NCLT, Chandigarh in CA No.120/2017 in CP (IB)No.7/Chd/Hry/2017 by virtue whereof the aforesaid CA has been dismissed in view of the undertaking given by learned counsel for Respondent on instructions that the respondents are not withdrawing any amount lying

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.310 of 2017 -2-

attached under the orders of the Executing court for the time being in view of the moratorium.

2. The Appellants claim to be the erstwhile employees of the Corporate Debtor being armed with the decree passed in Civil Suit by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Chandigarh, in CS No.576/2013, 577/2013 and 578/2013. They seek to assail the impugned order on the ground that the Resolution Professional has wrongfully granted authority letter in favour of Mr. Jalesh Grover, to file, submit and appear before the Adjudicating Authority.

3. It is the admitted position in the case that the application under Section 10 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code has been admitted and Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process has been initiated. Mr. Anil Goel has been appointed as Resolution Professional. Moratorium has been imposed. In view of the imposition of Moratorium and the Insolvency Resolution Process being under way, Appellants cannot file instant appeal to exercise their rights under decree passed in the civil litigation. The remedy lies somewhere else. The appeal is not maintainable and stands dismissed.

(Justice Bansi Lal Bhat) Member (Judicial)

(Balvinder Singh) Member (Technical)

am/uk

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.310 of 2017

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free