Mohinish Kumar & Ors vs Premsons Super Steels Pvt Ltd & Ors
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 152 of 2021
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The appeal against the Adjudicating Authority's order liquidating the corporate debtor is not maintainable where the same issue, namely whether the CIRP was initiated fraudulently and maliciously without the consent or intimation of majority shareholders, is already pending determination before the Adjudicating Authority in a separate application under Sections 65, 72 and 77 of the I&B Code; the appellate forum will not entertain a challenge that overlaps with a live proceeding before the forum below, and the appellants' remedy lies in having that pending application decided.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Shri Mohinish Kumar & Ors. ....Appellants Vs. M/s. Premsons Super Steels Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ....Respondents Present: Appellants: Mr. Kunal Sabharwal, Advocate. Respondents: Mr. Abhishek Anand, Mr. Viren Sharma, Ms. Komal Abrol, Advocates for R1
ORDER
(Through Virtual Mode)
04.03.2021: This appeal has been preferred by Appellants claiming to be
62.5% share capital holders in Corporate Debtor- 'Premsons Super Steels Pvt.
Ltd.' assailing the impugned order dated 28th August, 2020 passed by the
Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), New Delhi, Division
Bench-III by virtue whereof the Corporate Debtor has been sent into
liquidation.
2. The issue raised in this appeal is that the Appellants being the majority
shareholders have been kept in dark and no intimation was given to them for
filing application under Section 10 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code,
2016 ("I&B Code" for short) seeking triggering of Corporate Insolvency
Resolution Process (CIRP) qua the Corporate Debtor.
Contd/-........
-2-
3. After hearing Mr. Kunal Sabharwal, Advocate representing the Appellant
and Mr. Abhishek Anand, Advocate entering appearance on behalf of the
liquidator, we find that the Appellants' application being IA No. 4000/2020 in
C.P. No. (IB)-404(ND)/2018 filed under Sections 65, 72 & 77 of the 'I&B Code'
and seeking directions against Respondent Nos.2 and 3 for fraudulent and
malicious initiation of CIRP is pending determination before the Adjudicating
Authority. Since in the instant appeal, initiation of CIRP is alleged to have been
done fraudulently and with malicious intention without intimation and consent
by majority shareholders (Appellants), this appeal would not lie as the matter
raising the same issue is pending determination before the Adjudicating
Authority.
We accordingly dispose off this appeal with request to the Adjudicating
Authority to expedite the disposal of IA No. 4000/2020 and make all endeavors
for its disposal within four weeks from today. We make it clear that we are not
expressing any opinion on the merits.
[Justice Bansi Lal Bhat] Acting Chairperson
[Dr. Ashok Kumar Mishra] Member (Technical)
AR/g Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 152 of 2021
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free