Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Mkm Diamonds Private Limited vs State Bank Of India Through The ...

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal18 December 2024Ashok Bhushan

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

Even where a corporate debtor is under the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, the statutory compliances of the corporate debtor must still be made, and the suspended management may inform the Interim Resolution Professional, who is to take the necessary steps to effect those compliances.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNALPRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHII.A. No. 8728 of 2024InCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1197 of 2023

IN THE MATTER OF: Paresh K. Mehta Investment Pvt. Ltd. ...Appellant Versus State Bank of India & Anr. ...Respondents

Present: For Appellant : Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure, Mr. Yash Prashant S. and Mr. Sagar N. Pahuna Patil, Advocates.

For Respondents : Mr. Sarthak Utangale, Advocate for R-1.

Ms. Neha Agarwal, Advocate for IRP/R-2.

ORDER

(Hybrid Mode)

18.12.2024 : I.A. No. 8728/2024

1. This is an Application filed by the Appellant seeking a direction to the

Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) to inform Ministry of Corporate Affairs

to delete remark "under the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP)"

from the status of the Corporate Debtor.

2. Counsel for the Appellant submits that Appellant is not pressing first

part of the Prayer a.

3. We are of the view that even if the Corporate Debtor is in the CIRP, the

statutory compliances have to be made. It shall be open for the Suspended

Management to inform the IRP, who shall do the needful to the statutory

compliances.

With these directions Application is disposed of.

Comp. App. (AT) (Ins.) No. 1197/2023

List this Appeal high on board on 15th January, 2025.

[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson

[Barun Mitra] Member (Technical)

[Arun Baroka] Member (Technical) himanshu/nn

I.A. No. 8728 of 2024 in Comp. App. (AT) (Ins.) No. 1197 of 2023 2 of 2

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free