Millennium Education Foundation vs Educomp Infrastructure & School ...
- CitationComp. App. (AT) (Ins.) No. 901 of 2022
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
An order passed by the Adjudicating Authority without notice to a party who was not before it does not bind that party; the party is therefore entitled to raise, in its reply to the application, any plea going to the maintainability of the application, and the earlier order shall not preclude the Adjudicating Authority from deciding those issues.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Millennium Education Foundation ....Appellant Vs.
Educomp Infrastructure & School Management Ltd. & ...Respondents Anr. For Appellant: Appeared but presence not marked. For Respondents:
ORDER
03.08.2022: Heard Learned Counsel for the Appellant.
2. This Appeal has been filed against the order dated 03.06.2022 passed
by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Bench-V,
New Delhi, by which order the Adjudicating Authority has issued notice to the
Appellant, the Corporate Debtor to file a Reply.
3. Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that the issue as to whether
Chairman of the Monitoring Committee is competent to initiate proceeding
under Section 9 of the IBC need to be addressed by the Corporate Debtor in
its Reply and since the order dated 03.06.2022 was passed without any notice
to the Appellant the same shall not come in the way when issue is adjudicated.
4. We are of the view that since the order dated 03.06.2022 was passed
when the Appellant was not before the Adjudicating Authority, it shall be open
for the Appellant to take such plea regarding maintainability of the Application 2
in the Reply as advised and the order dated 03.06.2022 shall not come in the
way of the Appellant when the issues are decided by the Adjudicating
Authority.
5. Learned Counsel for the Appellant prays for seven days' time to file a
Reply. Let a Reply be filed by the Appellant within seven days from today.
6. With these observations, the Appeal is disposed of.
[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson
[Justice M. Satyanarayana Murthy] Member (Judicial)
[Barun Mitra] Member (Technical) Anjali/nn
Comp. App. (AT) (Ins.) No. 901 of 2022
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free