Mekaster Finlease Limited vs Temple Leasing And Finance Limited
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 803 of 2023
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Adjudicating Authority was right to refuse exclusion of the 390-day period from the CIRP period where the Committee of Creditors' liquidation application had earlier been rejected with liberty to file a fresh application, and the applicant instead sought exclusion of time rather than filing that fresh application.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Mekaster Finlease Ltd. ...Appellant
Versus
Temple Leasing and Finance Ltd. ...Respondent
Present: For Appellant: Mohd Nazim Khan, Shubham Agarwal, Shahbaz Khan, Advocates For Respondent:
ORDER
05.07.2023: I.A. No. 2711 of 2022. This is an application praying for
condonation of 11 days delay in filing the Appeal.
2. Ground taken in the Application is that Appellant received certified copy
of the Impugned Order on 26th April, 2023 and thereafter certified copy of the
I.A. was received on 30th May, 2023. Due to said reasons, delay has been
caused.
3. Sufficient cause has been shown. Delay is condoned.
4. This Appeal has been filed against the Order dated 13th April, 2023
passed by the Adjudicating Authority rejecting I.A. No. 803 of 2023.
5. In the present case, Committee of Creditors has already taken a decision
to file Liquidation Application on 15th December, 2021 thereafter an
Application was filed by the Resolution Professional for liquidation which was
not entertained by Order dated 19th December, 2022 on the ground that -2-
Application is not complete. Liberty was granted to the RP to file fresh
application.
6. The Appellant before us has filed Resolution Plan which was not
approved thereafter an application was filed praying for exclusion of 390 days
from the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP in short) period which
application has now been rejected.
7. Counsel for the Appellant submits that Appellant has given the
Resolution Plan and still desirous to increase the amount.
8. We have heard the Appellant and perused the record.
9. The Adjudicating Authority has refused to exclude the period of 390
days from the CIRP Period noticing the fact that by order dated 19th December,
2022 liquidation application was rejected with liberty to file fresh application
and instead of filing fresh application for liquidation, application for exclusion
has been filed. We thus do not find any error in the order of the Adjudicating
Authority rejecting I.A. No. 803 of 2023. No grounds made out to interfere with
the Order. The Appeal is dismissed.
[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson
[Mr. Barun Mitra] Member (Technical)
Basant/nn
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 803/2023
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free