Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Mallan Khan vs State Of U.P.

Allahabad High Court7 May 2026Deepak Verma

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

A petition under Section 528 B.N.S.S. to quash summoning orders and proceedings in their entirety will be refused where the applicant has not exhausted alternative remedies available under law, but the applicant shall be afforded an opportunity to file a discharge application before the trial court, which application must be decided expeditiously in accordance with law.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABADNeutral Citation No. - 2026:AHC:105496HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABADAPPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 7154 of 2026Mallan Khan.....Applicant(s)VersusState of U.P......Opposite Party(s)Counsel for Applicant(s):Sunil Kumar Tiwari, Vijay Kumar MishraCounsel for Opposite Party(s):G.A.Court No. - 74

HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. The present 528 B.N.S.S. application has been filed to quash the summoning order dated 11.09.2014 as well as entire proceeding of Complaint Case No.1341 of 2014 (State of U.P. vs. Mallan Khan), under sections 51 & 59(1) of Food Safety and Standars Act, 2006, Police Station Kunwar Gaon, District Badaun, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Second, Badaun.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. From perusal of complaint, no offence under alleged section is made out. Applicant has been enlarged on bail and on perusal of order-sheet, it is apparent that the applicant is regularly appearing on date fixed.

4. Per contra, learned AGA opposed the submission of applicant's counsel and submitted that prima facie, offence under the alleged sections is made out against the applicant. He further submitted that submission raised by applicant's counsel are disputed question of facts, which cannot be entertained at this stage.

5. The prayer for quashing the entire proceedings, summoning order of the aforesaid case against the applicant is, hereby, refused.

6. However, if applicant moves discharge application before the concerned court below within three weeks from today, the court below shall decide his application in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of filing of discharge application. Till the disposal of discharge application, no coercive action will be taken against the applicant.

7. With the above directions, this 528 B.N.S.S. application is disposed of.

(Deepak Verma,J.)

May 7, 2026

SKD

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free