Macquarie Bank Limited vs Uttam Galva Metallics Limited
- CitationCompany Appeals (AT) (Insol) No. 96 of 2017
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Under clause (c) of sub-section (3) of Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, an operational creditor's application must be accompanied by a certificate from a "financial institution" as defined in sub-section (14) of Section 3, and that requirement is mandatory and not merely directory; a foreign bank that is not a scheduled bank, a financial institution under Section 45-I of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, a public financial institution under the Companies Act, 2013, or notified by the Central Government cannot furnish such a certificate, and a certificate from such a bank cannot be relied upon to establish default. A demand notice under sub-section (1) of Section 8 of the Code must be issued by the operational creditor itself or by a person authorised to act on its behalf who holds a position with or in relation to the operational creditor, in the form prescribed under Rule 5 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016; a notice issued by an advocate or lawyer without any shown authority from the operational creditor or any position with it is not a notice under Section 8, and an application under Section 9 founded on such a notice is not maintainable.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI Company Appeals (AT) (Insol) No. 96 of 2017
Macquarie Bank Limited Appellant
Vs.
Uttam Galva Metallics Limited Respondent
Present: For Appellants: Mr. Vivek Sibal, Advocate
For Respondents: Mr. Puneet Singh Bindra and Mr. Arvind Gupta, Advocates
ORDER
17.07.2017 Appellant "Macquarie Bank Limited", a company
incorporated under the laws of Singapore, having its Office at 10, Marina
Boulevard, # 17.01, Tower-2, Marina Bay Financial Centre, Singapore-
018983 claiming to be the 'Operational Creditor', preferred the application
under Section 9 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter
referred to as 'I & B Code) seeking to set in motion the Corporate Insolvency
Resolution Process against the respondent "Uttam Galva Metallics Limited"
(alleged to be the 'Corporate Debtor').
2. Learned Adjudicating Authority ( National Company Law Tribunal),
Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh, by impugned order dated 1st June 2017,
having noticed that the demand notice under Section 8 of 'I & B Code' was
issued through an Advocate of Singapore and that the appellant has not
enclosed any certificate from a 'Financial Institution' maintaining the
accounts of the 'Operation Creditor' in terms of Clause (c) of sub-section (3) of Section 9 of the 'I & B Code' held that the petition preferred by appellant, a
foreign company having office at Singapore, under Section 9 was not
maintainable
3 Before deciding the issue, it is desirable to notice the relevant facts and
the provisions of '18; B Code'.
4. The appellant, a foreign company is not constituted under Companies
Act 1956 or/ Companies Act 2013, having account with one 'Macquarie Bank',
Australia. The appellant has no office in India, nor any account with any of
the Bank or 'Financial Institution' as defined under sub-section (14) of Section
3 of 'I & B Code', which reads as follows:-
"Definitions: -
3. In the Code, unless the context otherwise requires: -
(14) financial institution" means--
(a) a scheduled bank;
(b) financial institution as defined in section
45-I of the Reserve Bank of India Act 1934
(2 of 1934);
(c) public financial institution as defined in
clause (72) of section 2 of the Companies
Act, 2013 (18 of 2013); and
(d) such other institution as the Central
Government may by notification specify
as àfinancial institution;"
5. Admittedly, Macquarie Bank, Australia is not a scheduled bank in India
nor is a 'financial institution' as defined under Section 45-I of Reserve Bank 3
of India Act 1934 (2 of 1934). The Macquarie Bank, Australia also do not
come within the meaning of 'Public Financial Institution' as defined in clause
(72) of Section 2 of Companies Act 2013 (18 of 2013). The Central
Government has also not issued any Notification specifying 'Macquarie Bank'
for the purpose of sub-section (14) of Section 3 nw Section 9 of 'I & B Code'.
6. Section 9 of 'I & B Code' deals with application for initiation of Corporate
Insolvency Resolution Process by 'Operational Creditor'. Clause (c) of sub-
section (3) of Section 9 mandate the 'Operational Creditor' to file the
application 'in the form and manner accompanied with such fee as may be
prescribed' and also directs the 'Operational Creditor' to furnish along with
application a copy of the certificate from the 'Financial Institution'
maintaining accounts of the 'Operational Creditor' confirming that there is no
payment of unpaid operational debt by the 'Corporate Debtor', as apparent
from the provision, as quoted below:-
"9. Application for initiation of corporate insolvency
resolution process by operational creditor.-
reditor:
(1) After the expiry of the period of ten days from the
date of delivery of the notice or invoice demanding payment
under sub-section (1) of section 8, if the operational creditor
does not receive payment from the corporate debtor or notice
of the dispute under sub-section (2) of section 8, the
operational creditor may file an application before the
Adjudicating Authority for initiating a corporate insolvency
resolution process.
(2) The application under sub-section (1) shall be filed
in such form and manner and accompanied with such
fee as may be prescribed.
(3) The operational creditor shall, along with the
application furnish--
(a) a copy of the invoice demanding payment or
demand notice delivered by the operational
creditor to the corporate debtor;
(b) an affidavit to the effect that there is no
notice given by the corporate debtor relating to
a dispute of the unpaid operational debt;
(c) a copy of the certificate from the financial
institutions maintaining accounts of the
operational creditor confirming that there is no
payment of an unpaid operational debt by the
corporate debtor; and
(d) such other information as may be specified.
(4) An operational creditor initiating a corporate
insolvency resolution process under this section, may
propose a resolution professional to act as an interim
resolution professional.
(5) The Adjudicating Authority shall, within fourteen
days of the receipt of the application under sub-section
(2), by an order--
(i) admit. the application and communicate such
decision to the operational creditor and the corporate
debtor if--
(a) the application made under sub-section (2) is
complete;
(b) there is no repayment of the unpaid operational debt;
(c) the invoice or notice for payment to the corporate debtor has been delivered by the operational creditor;
(d) no notice of dispute has been received by the operational creditor or there is no record of dispute in the information utility; and
(e) there is no disciplinary proceeding pending against any resolution professional proposed under sub-section
(ii) reject the application and communicate such decision to the operational creditor and the corporate debtor, if-
(a) the application made under sub-section (2) is
incomplete;
(b) there has been repayment of the unpaid
operational debt;
(c) the creditor has not delivered the invoice or
notice for payment to the corporate debtor;
(d) notice of dispute has been received by the
operational creditor or there is a record of
dispute in the information utility; or
(e) any disciplinary proceeding is pending against
any proposed resolution professional:
Provided that Adjudicating Authority, shall before rejecting
an application under sub. clause (a) of clause (ii) give a notice
to the applicant to rectify the defect in his application within
seven days of the date of receipt of such notice from the
adjudicating Authority.
(6) The corporate insolvency resolution process shall
commence from the date of admission of the application
under sub-section (5) of this section".
7 The question whether filing of a copy of certificate from the 'Financial
Institution' maintaining accounts of the 'Operational Creditor' confirming that
there is no payment of unpaid operational debt by the 'Corporate Debtor' as
prescribed under clause (c) of subsection (3) of Section 9 of the 'I & B Code
is mandatory or directory was considered by this Appellate Tribunal in
"Smart timing Steel Ltd. Vs. National Steel and Agro Industries Ltd." -
Company Appeal (AT) (Insol) No. 28 of 2017. The Appellate Tribunal by its
judgement dated 19th May 2017 while held that certificate from the 'Financial
Institution' maintaining accounts of the 'Operational Creditor' confirming that there is no payment of unpaid operational debt by the 'Corporate Debtor', as
prescribed under clause (c) of sub-section (3) of Section 9 of the 'I & B Code'
mandatory, observed and held as follows: -
"11. On perusal of entire Section (3) along with
sub-sections and clauses, inclusive of proviso, it would
be crystal clear that, the entire provision of sub-clause
(3) of Section 9 required to be mandatorily followed and
it is not empty statutory formality.
12. Sub-section (2) stipulates filing of an
application under Section (1) only in the form and
manner and accompanied with such fees as may be
prescribed. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application
to Adjudicating Authority) Rules 2016 (hereinafter
referred to as 'Adjudicating Authority Rules 2016' for
short) are also enacted in exercise of the power conferred
by Clauses (c), (d), (e), (D of sub-section 239 read with
sections 7, 8, 9 and 10 of the 'I & B Code'. The rules
provide the procedure required to be followed by filing an
application by corporate insolvency resolution process.
As per Rule 6 of the 'Adjudicating Authority' Rules 2016,
an operational creditor shall make an application for
initiating the corporate insolvency process under section
9, in Form 5 accompanied with documents and records
required therein. As per sub-rule (2) of Rule 6 it is mandatory again to dispatch a copy of application filed
with the adjudicating authority, by registered post or
speed post to the registered office of the Corporate
Debtor.
13. The provisions of sub-section (3) mandates
the operational creditor to furnish copy of invoice
demanding payment or demand notice delivered by the
operational creditor to the corporate debtor, an affidavit
to the effect that, there is no notice given by the corporate
debtor relating to dispute of unpaid operational debt, a
copy of the certificate from the 'Financial Institutions'
maintaining accounts of the operational creditor
confirming that, there is no payment of an unpaid
operational debt by the corporate debtor and such other
information as may be stipulated. Sub-section (5) of
section 9 is procedure required to be followed by
Adjudicating Authority. One can say that procedural
part is not mandatory but is directory.
14. The provision being "directory" or
"mandatory" has fallen for consideration before Hon 'ble
Supreme Court on numerous occasions. In Manilal Shah
Vs. SardarSayed Ahmed (1955) 1 SCR 108, the Hon'ble
Apex Court held that where statute itself provide
consequences of breach or non-compliance, normally the 9
provision has to be regarded as having mandatory in
nature.
15. One of the cardinal principles of
interpretation of statute is that, the words of statute must
prima facie be given their ordinary meaning, unless of
course, such construction leads to absurdity or unless
there is something in the context or in the object of the
statute to the contrary. When the words of statute are
clear, plain and unambiguous, then, the courts are
bound to give effect to that meaning, irrespective of the
consequences involved. Normally, the words used by the
legislature themselves declare the legislative intent
particularly where the words of the statute are clear,
plain and unambiguous. In such case, effort must be to
give a meaning to each and every word used by the
legislature and it is not sound principle of construction to
brush aside words in statute as being redundant or
surplus, and particularly when such words can have
proper application in circumstances conceivable within
the contemplation of the statute.
16. For determination of the issue whether a
provision is mandatory or not, it will be desirable to refer
to decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Mysore 10
Vs. V.K.Kangan (1976)2 SCC 895. In the said case, the
Hon'ble Supreme Court specifically held:
"10. In determining the question whether a
provision is mandatory or directory, one must
look into the subject-matter and consider the
importance of the provision disregarded and the
relation of that provision to the general object
intended to be secured. No doubt, all laws are
mandatory in the sense they impose the duty to
obey on those who come within its purview. But
it does not follow that every departure from it
shall taint the proceedings with a fatal blemish.
The determination of the question whether a
provision is mandatory or directory would, in the
ultimate analysis, depend upon the intent of the
law-maker. And that has to be gathered not only
from the phraseology of the provision but also by
considering its nature, its design and the
consequences which would follow from
construing it in one way or the other."
16. Therefore, it is clear that the word 'shall'
used in sub-section (3) of section 9 of 'I & B Code' is
mandatory, including clause 3 therein."
8. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of appellant, tried to distinguish
the judgement in 'Smart Timings Steel Ltd.' on the ground that the said
company had not enclosed any other evidence in support of the debt and
default of debt. Reliance was placed on Form-5 enclosed with Insolvency and
Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules 2016 (hereinafter
referred to as "Adjudicating Authority Rules"). As per Rule 6 of 'Adjudicating
Authority Rules', the 'Operational Creditor' is required to make an application
in Form-5. In the said Form-5 at Part V, particulars of operational debt
(documents, records and evidence of default) have been mentioned, as quoted
below: -
Part-V PARTICULARS OF OPERATIONAL DEBT [DOCUMENTS, RECORDS AND EVIDENCE OF DEFAULT]
1 PARTICULARS OF SECURITY HELD, IF ANY, THE DATE OF ITS CREATION, ITS ESTIMATED VALUE AS PER THE CREDITOR.
ATTACH A COPY OF A CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION OF CHARGE ISSUED BY THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES (IF THE CORPORATE DEBTOR IS A COMPANY)
2. DETAILS OF RESERVATION / RETENTION OF TITLE ARRANGEMENTS (IF ANY) IN RESPECT OF GOODS TO WHICH THE OPERATIONAL DEBT REFERS
3. PARTICULARS OF AN ORDER OF A COURT, TRIBUNAL OR ARBITRAL PANEL ADJUDICATING ON THE DEFAULT, IF ANY (ATTACH A COPY OF THE ORDER)
4. RECORD OF DEFAULT WITH THE INFORMATION UTILITY, IF ANY (ATTACH A COPY OF SUCH RECORD)
5. DETAILS OF SUCCESSION CERTIFICATE, OR PROBATE OF A WILL, OR LETTER OF ADMINISTRATION, OR COURT DECREE (AS MAY BE APPLICABLE),. UNDER THE INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT, 1925 (10 OF 1925) (ATTACH A COPY)
6. PROVISION OF LAW, CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT UNDER WHICH OPERATIONAL DEBT HAS BECOME DUE
7. A STATEMENT OF BANK ACCOUNT WHERE DEPOSITS ARE MADE OR CREDITS RECEIVED NORMALLY BY THE OPERATIONAL CREDITOR IN RESPECT OF THE DEBT OF THE CORPORATE DEBTOR (ATTACH A COPY)
8. LIST OF OTHER DOCUMENTS ATTACHED TO THIS APPLICATION 1W ORDER TO PROVE THE EXISTENCE OF 12
9. It was contended that the record of default with the 'information utility'
has been mentioned therein but not the record as a certificate for 'financial
institution' But such submission cannot be accepted for two reasons, the
first being the appellant has not even enclosed 'record of default with the
information utility', as mentioned therein and the second reason is that Form-
5 cannot override the substantive provision of clause (c) of sub-section (3) of
Section 9 of 'I & B Code' which mandates enclosure of certificate from
'Financial Institution' maintaining accounts of 'Operation Creditor' confirming
that there is no payment of unpaid operational debt by the 'Corporate Debtor'.
10. We thereby, hold that 'Macquarie Bank', Australia not being a 'financial
institution' within the meaning of sub-section (14) of Section 3 of the 'I & B
Code', any certificate given by the said bank cannot be relied upon, to decide
default of debt.
11. There is another reason to hold that the application under Section 9 is
not maintainable. We find from the record that the so called application under
Section 8 is not in accordance with law and is defective. The notice under
sub-section (1) of Section 8 of 'I & B Code was not issued by the 'Operational
Creditor' but by a Lawyer of Singapore.
12. Section 8 of 'I & B Code' is as follows: -
"8. Insolvency resolution by operational creditor:
(1) An operational creditor may, on the occurrence of a
default, deliver a demand notice of unpaid operational debtor
copy of an invoice demanding payment of the amount involved 13
in the default to the corporate debtor in such form and manner
as may be prescribed. Persons who may initiate corporate
insolvency resolution process. Initiation of corporate insolvency
resolution process by financial creditor. Insolvency resolution
by operational creditor.
(2) The corporate debtor shall, within a period often days
of the receipt of the demand notice or copy of the invoice
mentioned in sub-section (1) bring to the notice of the
operational creditor--
(a) existence of a dispute, if any, and record of the
pendency of the suit or arbitration proceedings
filed before the receipt of such notice or invoice in
relation to such dispute;
(b) the repayment of unpaid operational debt--
(i) by sending an attested copy of the record of
electronic transfer of the unpaid amount from the
bank account of the corporate debtor; or
(ii) by sending an attested copy of record that the
operational creditor has encashed a cheque
issued by the corporate debtor.
Explanation.--For the purposes of this section, a "demand
notice" means a notice served by an operational creditor to the 14
corporate debtor demanding repayment of the operational debt in
respect of which the default has occurred"
13. From the plain reading of sub-section (1) of Section 8 it is clear that
on occurrence of default, the 'Operational Creditor' is required to deliver a
demand notice of unpaid operational debt, copy of invoice, demanding
payment of amount involved in the default to the 'Corporate Debtor' "in such
form and manner as prescribed."
14. Sub-Rule (1) of Rule-5 of the Adjudicating Authority Rules mandates
the 'Operational Creditor' to deliver the 'Corporate Debtor' the demand notice
in Form-3 or invoice attached with the notice in Form-4 as quoted below:-
"5. Demand notice by operational creditor. - (1) An
operational creditor shall deliver to the corporate debtor, the
following documents, namely. -
(a) a demand notice in Form 3; or
(b) a copy of an invoice attached with a notice in Form 4
(2) The demand notice or the copy of the invoice demanding
payment referred to in sub-section (2) of section 8 of the Code,
may be delivered to the corporate debtor,
(a) at the registered office by hand, registered post or
speed post with acknowledgement due; or
(b) by electronic mail service to a whole time director or
designated partner or key managerial personnel, if
any, of the corporate debtor.
15
(3) A copy of demand notice or invoice demanding payment
served under this rule by an operational creditor shall also
be filed with an information utility, if any."
15. Clause (a) & (b) of sub-Rule (1) of Rule-5 of the Adjudicating Authority
Rules mandates the 'Operational Creditor' to deliver the 'Corporate Debtor'
either the demand notice in Form - 3 or a copy of an invoice attached with a
notice in Form - 4. If the Rule 5 is read with the demand notice Form - 3 or
invoice in Form - 4, it is clear that who are persons authorized to give the
notice under Section 8 of the 'I & B Code', as apparent from last portion of
Form - 3 & Form - 4, as quoted below: -
"6. The undersigned request you to unconditionally
repay the unpaid operational debt (in default) in full
within ten days from the receipt of this letter failing
which we shall initiate a corporate insolvency
resolution process in respect of [name of corporate
debtor].
Yours sincerely,
Signature of person authorised to act in behalf of the operational creditor Name in block letters Position with or in relation to the operational creditor Address of person signing
16. From bare perusal of Form-3 and Form-4, read with sub-Rule (1) of
Rule 5 and Section 8 of the 'I & B Code, it is clear that the 'Operational
Creditor' can apply himself or through a person authorized to act on behalf 16
of the 'Operational Creditor', who hold same position with or in relation to
the 'Operational Creditor'. Thereby such person(s) authorized by
'Operational Creditor', holding position with or in relation to the 'Operational.
Creditor' can only apply.
17. In view of such provision we hold that an advocate / lawyer or
Chartered Account or a Company Secretary or any other person in absence
of any authority by the 'Operational Creditor', and if such person do not hold
any position with or in relation to the 'Operational Creditor', cannot issue
notice under Section 8 of 'I & B Code', which otherwise can be treated as a
lawyer's notice/ pleader's notice, as distinct from notice under Section 8 of 'I
& B Code.
18. The demand notice/ invoice Demanding Payment under the I& B Code
required to be issued in Form-3 or Form - 4. By the said notice, the
'Corporate Debtor' is to be informed of particulars of 'Operational Debt', with
a demand of payment, with clear understanding that the 'Operational Debt'
(in default), as claimed, is to be paid, unconditionally within ten days from
the date of receipt of letter failing which the 'Operational Creditor' will initiate
a Corporate Insolvency Process in respect of 'Corporate Debtor', as apparent
from last paragraph no. 6 of notice contained in form - 3, and quoted above.
Only if such notice in Form - 3 or Form - 4 is served, the 'Corporate
Debtor' will understand the serious consequences of non-payment of
'Operational Debt', otherwise like any normal pleader notice/Advocate notice
or like notice under Section 80 of C.P.C. or notice for initiation of proceeding
under Section 433 of the Companies Act 1956, the 'Corporate Debtor' may 17
decide to contest the suit/case if filed, as distinct Corporate Resolution
Process, where such claim otherwise cannot be contested, except where
there is an existence of dispute, prior to issuance of notice under Section 8.
19. In the present case, as the notice has been given by an
advocate/lawyer and there is nothing on the record to suggest that the
lawyer was authorized by the appellant, and as there is nothing on the record
to suggest that the said lawyer/ advocate hold any position with or in relation
to the appellant company, we hold that the notice issued by the
advocate/ lawyer on behalf of the appellant cannot be treated as notice under
Section 8 of the 'I & B Code'. And for the said reason also the petition under
Section 9 at the instance of the appellant against the respondent was not
maintainable.
18. We find no merit in this appeal. It is accordingly dismissed. However,
in the facts and circumstances of the case there shall be no order as to cost.
(Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya) Chairperson
(Balvinder Singh) Member(Technical) sm
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free