M/S. Supreme Cylinders Ltd vs C.C.E. Jaipur
- CitationAppeal No. E/59200/2013-EX(SM)
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Tribunal may, in its discretion, refuse to admit an appeal against an order of the Commissioner (Appeals) under Section 35B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 where the amount in dispute, being a disputed case not involving any question of rate of duty or valuation, does not exceed the monetary limit in the first proviso to Section 35B(1); the monetary limit operates as a bar on the Tribunal's discretion to admit such an appeal, and the Tribunal may invoke it to dismiss the appeal where the amount involved is below fifty thousand rupees.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
[Arising out of Order-in-Appeal No. 54(VC)/CE/JPR-I/2013 dated 18.06.2013 by the Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax (Appeals), Delhi].
For approval and signature:
Honble Shri Ashok Jindal, Member (Judicial)
1 Whether Press Reporters may be allowed to see the Order for publication as per Rule 27 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982?
2 Whether it should be released under Rule 27 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 for publication in any authoritative report or not?
3 Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the Order?
4 Whether Order is to be circulated to the Departmental authorities?
M/s. Supreme Cylinders Ltd. .Appellants
Vs.
C.C.E. Jaipur .Respondent
Appearance:
Shri Mohit Fatehpuria, Authorized Representative for the Appellants
Shri A.K. Dhawan, DR for the Respondent
CORAM:
Hon'ble Shri Ashok Jindal, Member (Judicial)
Date of Hearing: 17.03.2015
FINAL ORDER NO. 50799/2015-EX(SM)
Per Ashok Jindal:
The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order for rejection of their refund claim of Rs.24,974/-.
2. It was pointed out to the appellant that why not their appeal be dismissed as per Section 35 (B) proviso of the Central Excise Act 1944 not to entertain the appeal where amount is less than Rs.50,000/-. The appellant produced the CBEC instructions dated 17.08.2011 and submits that monetary limits applies to the department and not the appellant / assessee.
3. Heard the appellant and perused the provisions of Section 35 (B) of the Central Excise Act 1944. For the ease of convenience it is reproduced below:
Any person aggrieved by any of the following orders may(1) appeal to the Appellate Tribunal
against such order
(a) a decision or order passed by the [Commissioner of Central Excise as an adjudicating
authority;
(b) an order passed by the [Commissioner (Appeals) under section 35A;
(c) an order passed by the Central Board of Excise and Customs constituted under the Central
Boards of Revenue Act, 1963 (54 of 1963) (hereafter in this Chapter referred to as the Board) or
the Appellate [Commissioner of Central Excise under section 35, as it stood immediately before
the appointed day;
(d) an order passed by the Board or the [Commissioner of Central Excise , either before or after
the appointed day, under section 35A, as it stood immediately before that day :
Provided that no appeal shall lie to the Appellate Tribunal and the Appellate Tribunal shall not
have jurisdiction to decide any appeal in respect of any order referred to in clause (b) if such
order relates to,
a case of loss of goods, where the loss occurs in transit from(a) a factory to a warehouse or to
another factory, or from one warehouse to another, or during the course of processing of the
goods in a warehouse or in storage, whether in a factory or in a warehouse;
a rebate of duty of excise on goods exported to any country or(b) territory outside India or on
excisable materials used in the manufacture of goods which are exported to any country or
territory outside India;
goods exported outside(c) India (except to Nepal or Bhutan) without payment of duty ;
(d) credit of any duty allowed to be utilised towards payment of excise duty on final products
under the provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder and such order is passed by the
Commissioner (Appeals) on or after the date appointed under section 109 of the Finance (No. 2)
Act, 1998:
Provided further that the Appellate Tribunal may, in its discretion, refuse to admit an appeal in
respect of an order referred to in clause (b) or clause (c) or clause (d) where
in any disputed case, other than a case where the determination(i) of any question having a
relation to the rate of duty of excise or to the value of goods for purposes of assessment is in
issue or is one of the points in issue, the difference in duty involved or the duty involved; or
the amount of fine or penalty determined by such order,(ii) does not exceed [fifty thousand
rupees ;
Every appeal against any order of the nature(1A) referred to in the first proviso to sub-section
(1), which is pending immediately before the commencement of Section 47 of the Finance Act,
1984, before the Appellate Tribunal and any matter arising out of, or connected with, such appeal
and which is so pending shall stand transferred on such commencement to the Central
Government, and the Central Government shall deal with such appeal or matter under section
35EE as if such appeal or matter were an application or a matter arising out of an application
made to it under that section.
The Central Board of Excise and Customs constituted under the (1B) (i) Central Boards of
Revenue Act, 1963 (54 of 1963) may, by notification in the Official Gazette, constitute such
Committees as may be necessary for the purposes of this Act.
(ii) Every Committee constituted under clause (i) shall consist of two Chief Commissioners of
Central Excise or two Commissioners of Central Excise, as the case may be.
The Committee of Commissioners of Central Excise (2) may, if it is of opinion that an order
passed by the Appellate [Commissioner of Central Excise under section 35, as it stood
immediately before the appointed day, or the [Commissioner (Appeals) under section 35A, is not
legal or proper, direct any Central Excise Officer authorised by him in this behalf (hereafter in this
Chapter referred to as the authorised officer) to appeal [on its behalf to the Appellate Tribunal
against such order.
Every appeal under this section shall be filed within (3) three months from the date on which the
order sought to be appealed against is communicated to the Commissioner of Central Excise , or,
as the case may be, the other party preferring the appeal.
On receipt of notice that an appeal has been preferred (4) under this section, the party against
whom the appeal has been preferred may, notwithstanding that he may not have appealed
against such order or any part thereof, file, within forty-five days of the receipt of the notice, a
memorandum of cross-objections verified in the prescribed manner against any part of the order
appealed against and such memorandum shall be disposed of by the Appellate Tribunal as if it
were an appeal presented within the time specified in sub-section (3).
The Appellate Tribunal may admit an appeal or permit the (5) filing of a memorandum of cross objections
after the expiry of the relevant period referred to in sub-section (3) or sub-section (4), if
it is satisfied that there was sufficient cause for not presenting it within that period.
(6) An appeal to the Appellate Tribunal shall be in the prescribed form and shall be verified in the
prescribed manner and shall, irrespective of the date of demand of duty and interest or of levy of
penalty in relation to which the appeal is made, be accompanied by a fee of,
(a) where the amount of duty and interest demanded and penalty levied by any Central Excise
Officer in the case to which the appeal relates is five lakh rupees or less, one thousand rupees;
(b) where the amount of duty and interest demanded and penalty levied by any Central Excise
Officer in the case to which the appeal relates is more than five lakh rupees but not exceeding
fifty lakh rupees, five thousand rupees;
(c) where the amount of duty and interest demanded and penalty levied by any Central Excise
Officer in the case to which the appeal relates is more than fifty lakh rupees, ten thousand rupees
Provided that no such fee shall be payable in the case of an appeal referred to in sub-section (2)
or a memorandum of cross-objections referred to in sub-section (4).
Every application made before the Appellate Tribunal, (7)
(a) in an appeal for grant of stay or for rectification of mistake or for any other purpose; or
(b) for restoration of an appeal or an application,
shall be accompanied by a fee of five hundred rupees :
Provided that no such fee shall be payable in the case of an application filed by or on behalf of
the Commissioner of Central Excise under this sub-section.
4. On going through the provisions, I find if the order passed by Ld. Commissioner (A) under Section 35 (A) of the Act, the amount is less than Rs.50,000/- and Tribunal has its discretion to refuse or admit the appeal. Therefore, by invoking the provision of Section 35 (B) proviso of Central Excise Act 1944 as the amount is less than Rs.50,000/-.
5. Therefore, I refuse to admit the appeal. Accordingly appeal is dismissed.
(Dictated and pronounced in the open court)
(Ashok Jindal) Member (Judicial)
Bhanu
4
E/59200/2013-EX(SM)
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free