M/S. Rci Industries & Technologies Ltd vs Union Bank Of India
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 646 of 2022
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
When a Corporate Debtor has been set ex parte and an application for recall of that ex parte order has been filed before the Adjudicating Authority, the Adjudicating Authority ought to consider and decide that recall application before proceeding with the Section 7 application and reserving its order on it.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
RCI Industries & Technologies Ltd. ...Appellant
Versus
Union Bank of India ...Respondent
Present: For Appellant: Mr. Mohit Chaudhary and Mr. Kunal Sachdeva, Advocates. For Respondent: Mr. Sanjay Bajaj and Mr. Samarth Bajaj, Advocates.
ORDER
(Virtual Mode)
03.06.2022: Heard learned counsel for the Appellant and Shri Sanjay
Bajaj, learned counsel appearing for the Respondent - Financial Creditor. This
Appeal has been filed against order dated 30.05.2022 by which the
Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), New Delhi, Bench-
III passed following order:-
"ORDER
Learned Counsel for the Financial Creditor is present. It is seen from the previous order dated 29.04.2022 that the Corporate Debtor has already been set ex parte in the matter. Arguments on behalf of the Financial Creditor have been heard at length. We have perused the documents filed along with petition under reference.
Ms. Mahima Ahuja, Advocate appears on behalf of the Corporate Debtor who has already been set ex parte on 29.04.2022 and submits that she has
Cont'd.../ -2-
filed appropriate application seeking setting aside the ex parte order dated 29.04.2022. However, the said application is not before us for further consideration.
After going through the submissions made by the Counsel for the Financial Creditor, order in this matter is reserved."
2. Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that in the Corporate
Insolvency Resolution Proceeding, the Appellant who was the Corporate
Debtor was set ex parte by order dated 29.04.2022. An application for recall
of said order was filed on 29.05.2022 and on 30.05.2022 when the matter was
taken up the said application was not before the court for consideration,
hence, the Court proceeded to reserve the matter under Section 7 Application.
3. We are of the view that when the recall application was filed, the
Adjudicating Authority ought to have considered the said application before
proceeding in the matter and reserving the order in Section 7 Application.
Application filed on 29.05.2022 for recall of order dated 29.04.2022 need to
be first heard and decided. We request the Adjudicating Authority to direct
for listing of the application filed on 29.05.2022 for recall of the ex-parte order
dated 29.04.2022 and after disposing the application to proceed further in the
matter. In view of the above, we dispose of this Appeal with the above
observations.
[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson
[Naresh Salecha] Member (Technical) Archana/nn
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 646 of 2022
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free