M/s Rane Holdings Limited — Combination C-2024/07/1167
- Case No.C-2024/07/1167
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where an acquirer that already exercises joint control over a target acquires the other joint venture partner's shareholding, so that it obtains sole control, and the Commission finds on the information available that this produces no change in market and competition dynamics, the combination is not likely to cause appreciable adverse effect on competition under the factors in Section 20(4), and it may be approved under Section 31(1). Approval under Section 31(1) rests on the information furnished by the acquirer and is liable to revocation if that information is found to be incorrect.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Notice under Section 6(2) of the Competition Act, 2002 given by Rane Holdings Limited.
CORAM:
Ms. Ravneet Kaur Chairperson
Mr. Anil Agrawal Member
Ms. Sweta Kakkad Member
Mr. Deepak Anurag Member
Order under Section 31(1) of the Competition Act, 2002
1. On 11th July 2024, the Competition Commission of India (Commission) received a notice (Notice) under Section 6(2) of the Competition Act, 2002 (Act), given by Rane Holdings Limited (RHL / Acquirer).
2. The Notice was filed pursuant to the Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) between NSK Limited (Japan) (NSK / Seller), (ii) RHL, and (iii) Rane NSK Steering Systems Private Limited (RNSSPL / Target), executed on 1st July 2024, and the License and Technical Assistance Agreement.
3. Proposed Combination relates to the acquisition of 51% equity shareholding in Rane NSK Steering Systems Private Limited (RNSSPL / Target) from its joint venture (JV) partner, NSK.
4. Pursuant to the Proposed Combination, RHL will hold 100% of the shareholding (on a fully diluted basis) in the Target.
5. In terms of Regulation 14 of the Competition Commission of India (Procedure in regard to the transaction of business relating to combinations) Regulations, 2011, vide letter dated 26th July 2024, certain information and clarifications were sought from the Acquirer. The Acquirer submitted response vide communication dated 5th August 2024.
6. RHL is a public listed company, which through its subsidiaries and JVs is engaged in the manufacturing and marketing of automotive components - including parts of steering and suspension systems, friction materials, valve train components, occupant safety systems, light metal casting products and connected mobility solutions. RHL also provides services relating to management consultancy, information technology, business development, and human resource training on a captive basis to its group companies.
7. RNSSPL is a JV between RHL (49%) and NSK (51%). RNSSPL is engaged primarily in the manufacture of steering columns, electric power steering (EPS) columns, and various components of the steering column.
8. The Proposed Combination involves an acquisition of a JV company (i.e., RNSSPL) by one of its parent companies (i.e., RHL) (which already has joint control of the Target) resulting in RHL assuming sole control of the Target. The Commission noted that the Proposed Combination is in the nature of joint to sole control and based on the information available, there is no change in the market and competition dynamics as a result of the Proposed Combination.
9. Considering the material on record, including the details provided in the Notice and the assessment of the Proposed Combination based on factors stated in Section 20(4) of the Act, the Commission is of the opinion that the Proposed Combination is not likely to have appreciable adverse effect on competition in India, and therefore, the Commission hereby approves the Proposed Combination under Section 31(1) of the Act.
10. This order may be revoked if, at any time, the information provided by Acquirer is found to be incorrect.
11. The information provided by the Acquirer shall be treated as confidential in terms of and subject to provisions of Section 57 of the Act.
12. The Secretary is directed to communicate this order to the Acquirer.
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free