M/S Precious Energy Services Ltd & Ors vs Registrar Of Companies, Nct Of Delhi & ...
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) No. 106 of 2017
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Tribunal may, under Rule 11 read with Rule 31 of the NCLAT Rules 2016, recall and correct its own order where there is an error apparent on the face of the record, including clerical or typographical errors in the fines imposed under the Companies Act, 1956, and may substitute corrected operative paragraphs in place of the erroneous ones.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Sapphire Industrial Infrastructures Pvt Ltd ...Appellants
Vs
Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana. ...Respondents
Alongwith I.A.No. 338 of 2017 in Company Appeal (AT) No. 107/2017
M/s Precious Energy Services Ltd & Ors. ...Appellants
Vs
Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana. ...Respondents
Present: Ms. Varsha Banerjee, Advocate with Mr. Milan Singh Negi and Mr. Kunal Godwani, Advocates for the Appellants. Mr. Ripu D Bhardwaj with Mr. T.P. Singh, Advocate for ROC.
ORDER
18.07.20 17 These applications under Rule 11 r/w Rule 31 of the
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Rules 2016 have been preferred by
appellants pointing out the clerical/ typographical errors as taken place in the
common order dated 30th May 2017 passed by this Appellate Tribunal in these
appeals.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants submits that the
company never violated Section 149 of the Companies Act, 1956, nor any
prayer was made for compounding of offence under Section 149 in Company
Petitions No. 16/10/2017 out of which Company Appeal(AT) No. 106 of 2017 arises. However, by the order dated 30th May 2017, fine have been imposed,
for offence punishable under Section 149 of the Companies act, 1956.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants further submits
that there was a violation of Section 178 of the Companies Act,- 1956, for
which the application for compounding was filed in the Company Petition No.
16/10/2017 giving rise to Company Appeal (AT) No. 106 of 2017. But by
order dated 30th May 2017, for alleged violation of Section 177, a fine of
Rupees 1,50,000/- (Rs. One Lakh Fifty Thousand only) has been imposed on
the three Directors, apart from the company. It is stated that the company
has not committed any offence and the violation of Section 178, relate to one
Director and three Officers i.e. total four officers.
Similarly, in paragraph no. 19, which related to C. P. No. 16/09/2017
out of which Company Appeal (AT) No. 107 of 2017 arises, for violation of
Section 177, a fine of Rs. 1,50,000/- (Rs. One Lac Fifty Thousand only) has
been imposed on the company and three Directors though the maximum
penalty prescribed is Rs. One Lakh.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Registrar of Companies
accepts the aforesaid typographical error, and submitted that such error has
occurred due to mistake committed by Tribunal while passing the impugned
judgement.
It is also submitted that the paragraph 20 of the common order of the
judgement dated 30th May 2017, the number of Company Petitions have not
been properly shown.
Having heard the parties and taking into consideration the aforesaid
facts, and in view of the fact that there is an error apparent in the face of the 3
order dated 30th May 2017, in exercise of power conferred by Rule 11 read
with Rule 31 of the NCLAT Rules, while we recall the paragraph nos. 18, 19
and 20 of the order dated 30th May 2017 passed in Company Appeal(AT)No.
106 of 2017 with Company Appeal (AT) No. 107 of 2017, substitute the
following order in place of paragraphs 18, 19 and 20 of the original order: -
"18. In view of the discussion as made above we
pass the following order in Company Appeal (AT) No.
106 of 2017.
For violation of Section 178(1) of the Companies
Act 1956, we impose a fine of Rs. 5 Lakhs (Rs. Five
lakhs only) on the company and Rs. 1 Lakh (One Lakh
each) on one director and three other officers of the
company (total four persons) and thereby appellants
are liable to pay Rs. 9 Lacs (Rs. Nine Lacs only) for
such alleged violation.
19. In so far as Company Appeal(AT) No. 107 of
2017 is concerned the following order is passed:-
For alleged violation of Section 177 of the
Companies Act, 1956, we impose afine of Rs. 5 lakhs
(Rs. Five Lakhs only) on the company and Rs. 1 lakh
(Rs. One Lakh only) each on one director and two
officers i.e. (total three officers) and thereby the
appellants are liable to pay another some of Rs. 8
lakhs (Rs. Eight Lakhs only) for alleged violation of
Section 177 of the Companies Act, 1956. Thereby, the 4
appellants are liable to pay total sum of Nine Lakhs
plus Eight Lakhs i.e. Seventeen Lakhs.
20. In view of the aforesaid order, we set aside the
impugned common order dated 13th February 2017
passed by Tribunal, New Delhi Bei.ch in C.P.No.
16/09/2017 and C.P.No. 16/10/2017."
The Interlocutory Application Nos. 337/2017 and 338/2017 both stand
disposed of with aforesaid substitution/ modification.
(Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya) Chairperson
(Balvindèr Singh) Member(Technical) sm
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free