M/S Perfect Infraengineers Limited vs M/S Lg Electronics India Pvt. Ltd
- CitationCOMPANY APPEAL (AT)(INSOLVENCY) NO.154 OF 2022
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Appellate Tribunal, faced with an appeal against an adjudicating authority's procedural directions (re-service and an affidavit of service, followed by repeated adjournments), disposed of the appeal by directing the respondent to file its reply before the next date of hearing, and by directing that the adjudicating authority shall not grant any further time for that reply, on the basis of fair play and good conscience so as to prevent an aberration of justice and secure the ends of justice.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
1
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI COMPANY APPEAL (AT)(INSOLVENCY) NO.154 OF 2022 In the matter of: Perfect Infraengineers Ltd Appellant Vs L.G. Electronics India Pvt Ltd Respondent Present: Mr. Ashutosh Kr Singh, Ms Farheen Penwale, Advocates for Appellant.
ORDER
VIRTUAL MODE 18.02.2022: Heard Ms Farheen Penwal, the Learned Counsel appearing for
the Appellant.
According to the Learned Counsel for the Appellant, the impugned order
in IB/358//ND/2020 was passed by the 'Adjudicating Authority' (National
Company Law Tribunal, Court V, Special Bench, New Delhi) on 09.11.2021
whereby and whereunder the Adjudicating Authority had observed that "In
the present matter, Learned Counsel for the Applicant stated that service has
been affected, but the affidavit of service has not been filed on record.
Accordingly, let a fresh notice be issued in the concerned party and affidavit of
service must be placed on record positively by on or before the next date of
hearing and the matter was directed to be listed on 14.12.2021.
The grievance of the Appellant is that the 'Adjudicating Authority' has
incorrectly passed the impugned order directing the Appellant to re-serve copy
Comp App (AT)(Ins) No.154/2022 2
of the aforesaid petition to the 'Respondent' and to file 'Fresh Affidavit' of
service and adjourned the matter to 14.12.2021.
It is represented on behalf of the Appellant that on 14.12.2021, the
Adjudicating Authority had inter alia directed the petitioner to serve copy of
the petition on the Email ID of the Respondent Counsel by tomorrow and the
Respondent counsel was directed to share the Email ID with the Petitioner in
the course of the day and based on the request of the Learned Counsel for the
Respondent, two weeks' time was granted to file Reply and it was further
observed that 'no further adjournment will be granted on any ground' and
further that Rejoinder, if any, be filed within a week from the date of receipt
of the Reply and directed that the matter to be listed on 13.01.2022.
It is brought to the fore on behalf of the Appellant that on 13.01.2022
and on 17.01.2022 the matter could not be taken up by the Adjudicating
Authority because of the paucity of time and even on 03.02.2022 the matter
could not be taken up by the Adjudicating Authority owing to paucity of time
and now the matter is slated on 28.02.2022.
The limited prayer of the Learned Counsel for the Appellant is that
already the Adjudicating Authority had observed in its order dated 14.12.2021
passed earlier that no further adjournment is to be granted on any score and
during the next date of hearing on 28.02.2022 the Respondent is to file its
Reply without precipitating the matter any further and for filing of Rejoinder,
if any, some time must be granted to the Appellant.
Considering the fact that the Adjudicating Authority on earlier
occasions had observed that no further adjournment will be granted for filing
Comp App (AT)(Ins) No.154/2022 3
of the Reply by the Respondent and despite the same the matter is likely to
come up on 28.02.2022 for the purpose of filing the Reply of the Respondent,
this 'Tribunal' on the basis of fair play and good conscience directs the
Respondent to file the Reply before 28.02.2022 and to serve the copy to the
Learned Counsel for the other side, well in advance before the next date of
hearing. It is made clear that the 'Adjudicating Authority' shall not grant any
further time for filing of 'Reply' to the Respondent so as to unnecessarily delay
the matter any further to prevent an aberration of justice, and to secure the
ends of justice.
With the aforesaid observations the instant Company
Appeal(AT)(Insolvency) No.154/2022 stands disposed off. No costs.
(Justice M. Venugopal) Member (Judicial)
(Dr. Ashok Kumar Mishra) Member (Technical) Bm/gc
Comp App (AT)(Ins) No.154/2022
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free