Miss Lucy
← All judgments

M/S Libra Auto & General Finance Ltd vs Rajeev Bhambri. Resolution ...

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal19 December 2024

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

Where a creditor's claim in insolvency is rejected as time-barred in respect of the principal, the Adjudicating Authority's finding on that limitation point stands, but a claim for interest under the same loan agreement, which the Adjudicating Authority has not examined, must be considered afresh and is not automatically barred merely because the principal claim is time-barred. The Adjudicating Authority, being empowered under Section 60(5) to examine any application arising out of insolvency, has full jurisdiction to consider all issues relating to the admission of a claim or part of a claim, including a claim for interest.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNALPRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHIComp. App. (AT) (Ins) No.764 of 2024IN THE MATTER OF:

M/s. Libra Auto & General Finance Ltd. ....Appellant

Vs.

Rajeev Bhambri, ....Respondent RP, Future Colonizers & Construction Limited

Present: For Appellant: Ms. Harsheen M. Palli, Advocate For Respondent: Ms. Aslam Ahmed, Advocate

ORDER

(Hybrid Mode)

19.12.2024 - Heard learned Counsel for the Appellant as well as the

learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent.

2. This Appeal has been filed against the Order dated 12.01.2024 passed by

the Adjudicating Authority in I.A. No.689 of 2023. The I.A. was filed by the

Appellant seeking a direction to admit the claim of the Appellant which was

refused to be admitted by the Resolution Professional. The Adjudicating

Authority by impugned Order has rejected the claim as barred by time. The

submission which has been made by the learned Counsel for the Appellant is

that as per loan agreement dated 14th January, 2013, there was an interest

liability on monthly basis and even if the principal amount was barred by time,

the interest liability will continue and the claim ought to have been admitted.

Learned Counsel for the Respondent opposed the submission of the Appellant 2

and submits that the interest liability cannot run when the principal amount is

itself barred by time. It is submitted that in its loan claim for interest cannot be

accepted which is contrary to the provisions of the Interest Act.

3. We have considered the submissions of the learned Counsel for the parties

and perused the records. In so far as the finding of the Adjudicating Authority

that principal claim was barred by time, we see no reason to interfere with that

finding hence the rejection of the claim of the principal amount is affirmed. In so

far as the question of the admission of the claim towards the interest, the same

issue has not been gone into by the Adjudicating Authority, we are of the view

that in so far as the claim of the Appellant towards the interest is concerned, the

Adjudicating Authority may examine the said claim afresh after hearing both the

parties.

4. We make it clear that we are not expressing any opinion on the merits of

the claim of the either of the parties. It is for the Adjudicating Authority to

consider and take a decision whether any claim towards interest can be admitted

or not. Learned Counsel for the Respondent submits that the Adjudicating

Authority cannot go to the issue of interest, we do not find any substance in the

submission of the learned Counsel for the Respondent. Adjudicating Authority

who is empowered to examine any application under Section 60(5) as is entitled

to examine all issues which arises out of insolvency hence the Adjudicating

Authority has full jurisdiction to consider all issues pertaining to admission of

Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No.764 of 2024 3

the claim or part of the claim. We thus reject the above submission of the

Respondent.

5. In view of the aforesaid, we dispose of the Appeal by remitting the matter

to the limited extent as indicated above for consideration.

[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson

[Barun Mitra] Member (Technical) rs/nn

Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No.764 of 2024

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free