M/S. Kyungshin Industrial Motherson ... vs Cce, Chennai Iv
- CitationAppeal No. 244/2013
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Credit of service tax paid on rent-a-cab service used to transport employees to the factory, and on pest control service used to protect raw materials, is admissible as CENVAT credit where the adjudicating authority has found no contrary evidence that these services were attributable to manufacture. Service tax credit on outdoor catering service provided to employees is not admissible where the factory is required under the Factories Act, 1948 to maintain a canteen.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
(Arising out of Order-in-Appeal No. 244/2013 (M-IV0 dated 18.11.2013 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Chennai)
M/s. Kyungshin Industrial Motherson Ltd. Appellant
Vs.
CCE, Chennai IV Respondent
Appearance
Shri G. Natarajan, Advocate, for the Appellant Shri R. Subramaniyan, AC (AR) for the Respondent
CORAM
Honble Shri D.N. Panda, Judicial Member
Date of Hearing / Decision: 13.2.2015
Final Order No. 40157 / 2015
Learned counsel submits that the service tax paid on three services i.e., rent-a-cab service availed to transport the employees from different places to factory site, pest control service availed to protect the raw materials and the out-door catering service availed to provide food to its employees which are input services credit thereon has been denied.
2. Perusal of the adjudication order shows that appellants grievance before the authority below was that the transport service was used to bring the employees to the factory and no contrary evidence was found by learned adjudicating authority. Similarly, so far as pest control service is concerned, appellants submission cannot be ruled which was used to protect raw material without contrary evidence on record. Therefore, CENVAT credit in respect of these two input services is admissible to the appellant when those were attributable to manufacture.
3. So far as catering service is concerned, appellant says it is a factory. Once Factories Act, 1948 requires a canteen to be maintained by a factory, no input credit on catering service shall be admissible.
4. On the above circumstances, denial of CENVAT credit to appellant on catering service as ordered by learned adjudicating authority is confirmed and credit in respect of other two services is allowed.
5. In view of above, appeal is partly allowed to the extent indicated above and stay application is disposed. (Dictated and pronounced in open court)
(D.N. Panda) Judicial Member
Rex
2
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free