M/S Euris Consult Pvt. Ltd vs Registrar Of Companies (Nct Of Delhi & ...
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) No. 163 of 2021
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The appellate tribunal set aside the Tribunal's refusal to restore the appeal, holding that the restoration application should not have been rejected where the restricted functioning of the Tribunal during the Covid period prevented the appellant from appearing. Restoration was ordered on payment of costs, with the matter listed before the Tribunal for hearing on the merits.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Euris Consult Pvt. Ltd. ....Appellant
Vs.
Registrar of Companies & Ors. ....Respondents
Present: For Appellant:- Mr. A.K. Pathak, Advocate. For Respondent:- Mr. Kamal Kant Jha, Sr. Panel Counsel for GOI and Ms. Mitika Raja, AROC for R-1. Mr. Nikhil Jain, Advocate for Punit Rai, Sr. Standing Counsel for Income Tax. For R-2.
ORDER
14.11.2022: The Appellant - Euris Consult Pvt. Ltd. filed the instant
Appeal being aggrieved and dissatisfied by the order dated 08.10.2021 passed
by the National Company Law Tribunal (New Delhi, Court-IV) in RA-
05/ND/2021 Appeal No. 470/252/ND/2019 whereby and whereunder the
application filed for restoration of appeal under Section 252 of the Companies
Act, 2013 was rejected.
2. The Ld. Counsel for the Appellant submits that the Tribunal failed to
consider the fact that due to restricted functioning of the Tribunal on account of
Covid, the appellant could not appear before the Tribunal.
3. The Ld. Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 / ROC filed his Reply Affidavit
and opposed the prayer made by the Appellant in the instant Appeal. Further it
has been stated that there is no ground for restoration of the appeal.
4. After hearing the parties and going through the impugned order passed by
the Tribunal, the impugned order dated 08.10.2021 passed by the National -2-
Company Law Tribunal (New Delhi, Court-IV) in RA-05/ND/2021 Appeal No.
470/252/ND/2019 is hereby set aside and the appeal is restored to the original
file subject to deposition of cost of Rs. 11,000/- in the fund of Ministry of
Corporate Affairs. Since the parties have appeared before the Tribunal, therefore,
no notice is required. The parties are directed to appear before the Tribunal on
11.01.2023 and after hearing the parties, the Tribunal may pass appropriate
orders in the matter. The Ld. Counsel for the Appellant is also directed to file
receipt showing payment of aforesaid amount before the fixed date.
With these observations and directions, the instant Appeal is disposed of.
5. Registry to upload the Order on the website of this Appellate Tribunal and
send the copy of this Order to the National Company Law Tribunal (New Delhi,
Court-IV), forthwith.
[Justice Anant Bijay Singh] Member (Judicial)
[Ms. Shreesha Merla] Member (Technical)
R.N./Kam./
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free